Multi-Turn Context Jailbreak Attack on Large Language Models From First Principles
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Provides a plain English summary of a research paper on "Multi-Turn Context Jailbreak Attack on Large Language Models From First Principles"
- Covers the paper's key ideas, experiment design, and insights in an easy-to-understand way
- Discusses the paper's caveats, limitations, and potential areas for further research
- Encourages readers to think critically about the research and form their own opinions
Plain English Explanation
The research paper explores a type of attack called a "multi-turn context jailbreak attack" on large language models. These models are AI systems that can generate human-like text. The researchers wanted to see if they could coerce these models into producing harmful or unsafe content by gradually feeding them certain types of information over multiple interactions.
The basic idea is that the researchers would start with an innocuous prompt, then gradually introduce more and more context that could push the model to generate increasingly problematic responses. For example, they might begin with a neutral query, then slowly introduce biased or toxic language to see if the model would start producing that type of content itself.
The researchers conducted experiments to test the effectiveness of this multi-turn attack approach, and found that it could sometimes be successful in causing large language models to generate unsafe outputs. However, they also noted some limitations and potential ways to defend against such attacks.
Technical Explanation
The paper describes a multi-step attack technique that aims to gradually "jailbreak" or bypass the safety constraints of large language models. The researchers hypothesized that by carefully constructing a sequence of prompts that build upon each other, they could coerce the model into producing increasingly harmful or undesirable outputs, even if the initial prompts were benign.
To test this, the researchers conducted experiments where they prompted models with a series of messages that slowly introduced more biased, toxic, or unsafe language. They found that in some cases, the models would eventually generate responses aligned with the negative framing introduced through the multi-turn context.
The researchers explored various parameters that could influence the success of these attacks, such as the number of turns, the specific language used, and the model architecture. They also investigated potential defense mechanisms, including prompt engineering and model fine-tuning.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable insights into the vulnerabilities of large language models to context-driven attacks. By demonstrating how gradual, multi-step prompting can lead to the generation of harmful content, the researchers highlight an important security risk that must be addressed.
However, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and areas for future work. For example, the experiments were conducted on a limited set of models and prompts, and the long-term impacts of such attacks were not fully explored. Additionally, the researchers note that more research is needed to develop robust defense strategies that can reliably mitigate these types of attacks.
It's also important to consider the potential ethical implications of this research. While understanding the attack vectors is valuable, great care must be taken to ensure that the findings are not misused to cause harm. The researchers emphasize the need for responsible disclosure and the development of safeguards to protect against the misuse of large language models.
Conclusion
The research paper offers a thought-provoking exploration of multi-turn context jailbreak attacks on large language models. By demonstrating how gradual prompting can bypass safety constraints, the study sheds light on a significant vulnerability that must be addressed by the AI research community.
While the findings raise important security concerns, the paper also highlights the need for continued research and the development of robust defense mechanisms. Ultimately, this work serves as a valuable contribution to the ongoing efforts to ensure the responsible and secure deployment of large language models in real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Multi-Turn Context Jailbreak Attack on Large Language Models From First Principles
Xiongtao Sun, Deyue Zhang, Dongdong Yang, Quanchen Zou, Hui Li
Large language models (LLMs) have significantly enhanced the performance of numerous applications, from intelligent conversations to text generation. However, their inherent security vulnerabilities have become an increasingly significant challenge, especially with respect to jailbreak attacks. Attackers can circumvent the security mechanisms of these LLMs, breaching security constraints and causing harmful outputs. Focusing on multi-turn semantic jailbreak attacks, we observe that existing methods lack specific considerations for the role of multiturn dialogues in attack strategies, leading to semantic deviations during continuous interactions. Therefore, in this paper, we establish a theoretical foundation for multi-turn attacks by considering their support in jailbreak attacks, and based on this, propose a context-based contextual fusion black-box jailbreak attack method, named Context Fusion Attack (CFA). This method approach involves filtering and extracting key terms from the target, constructing contextual scenarios around these terms, dynamically integrating the target into the scenarios, replacing malicious key terms within the target, and thereby concealing the direct malicious intent. Through comparisons on various mainstream LLMs and red team datasets, we have demonstrated CFA's superior success rate, divergence, and harmfulness compared to other multi-turn attack strategies, particularly showcasing significant advantages on Llama3 and GPT-4.
Read more8/12/2024
0
Emerging Vulnerabilities in Frontier Models: Multi-Turn Jailbreak Attacks
Tom Gibbs, Ethan Kosak-Hine, George Ingebretsen, Jason Zhang, Julius Broomfield, Sara Pieri, Reihaneh Iranmanesh, Reihaneh Rabbany, Kellin Pelrine
Large language models (LLMs) are improving at an exceptional rate. However, these models are still susceptible to jailbreak attacks, which are becoming increasingly dangerous as models become increasingly powerful. In this work, we introduce a dataset of jailbreaks where each example can be input in both a single or a multi-turn format. We show that while equivalent in content, they are not equivalent in jailbreak success: defending against one structure does not guarantee defense against the other. Similarly, LLM-based filter guardrails also perform differently depending on not just the input content but the input structure. Thus, vulnerabilities of frontier models should be studied in both single and multi-turn settings; this dataset provides a tool to do so.
Read more9/4/2024
0
LLM Defenses Are Not Robust to Multi-Turn Human Jailbreaks Yet
Nathaniel Li, Ziwen Han, Ian Steneker, Willow Primack, Riley Goodside, Hugh Zhang, Zifan Wang, Cristina Menghini, Summer Yue
Recent large language model (LLM) defenses have greatly improved models' ability to refuse harmful queries, even when adversarially attacked. However, LLM defenses are primarily evaluated against automated adversarial attacks in a single turn of conversation, an insufficient threat model for real-world malicious use. We demonstrate that multi-turn human jailbreaks uncover significant vulnerabilities, exceeding 70% attack success rate (ASR) on HarmBench against defenses that report single-digit ASRs with automated single-turn attacks. Human jailbreaks also reveal vulnerabilities in machine unlearning defenses, successfully recovering dual-use biosecurity knowledge from unlearned models. We compile these results into Multi-Turn Human Jailbreaks (MHJ), a dataset of 2,912 prompts across 537 multi-turn jailbreaks. We publicly release MHJ alongside a compendium of jailbreak tactics developed across dozens of commercial red teaming engagements, supporting research towards stronger LLM defenses.
Read more9/5/2024
0
Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses Against Large Language Models: A Survey
Sibo Yi, Yule Liu, Zhen Sun, Tianshuo Cong, Xinlei He, Jiaxing Song, Ke Xu, Qi Li
Large Language Models (LLMs) have performed exceptionally in various text-generative tasks, including question answering, translation, code completion, etc. However, the over-assistance of LLMs has raised the challenge of jailbreaking, which induces the model to generate malicious responses against the usage policy and society by designing adversarial prompts. With the emergence of jailbreak attack methods exploiting different vulnerabilities in LLMs, the corresponding safety alignment measures are also evolving. In this paper, we propose a comprehensive and detailed taxonomy of jailbreak attack and defense methods. For instance, the attack methods are divided into black-box and white-box attacks based on the transparency of the target model. Meanwhile, we classify defense methods into prompt-level and model-level defenses. Additionally, we further subdivide these attack and defense methods into distinct sub-classes and present a coherent diagram illustrating their relationships. We also conduct an investigation into the current evaluation methods and compare them from different perspectives. Our findings aim to inspire future research and practical implementations in safeguarding LLMs against adversarial attacks. Above all, although jailbreak remains a significant concern within the community, we believe that our work enhances the understanding of this domain and provides a foundation for developing more secure LLMs.
Read more9/2/2024