Emerging Vulnerabilities in Frontier Models: Multi-Turn Jailbreak Attacks
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Frontier language models can be vulnerable to multi-turn "jailbreak" attacks that bypass safety controls
- Researchers developed various attack strategies and evaluated their effectiveness against leading models
- Findings suggest current defenses are not robust, highlighting the need for more advanced safety mechanisms
Plain English Explanation
Powerful language models, like those used in chatbots and digital assistants, are increasingly being deployed in real-world applications. However, these models can be vulnerable to sophisticated attacks that allow users to bypass the built-in safeguards and safety controls.
One such attack strategy is the "multi-turn jailbreak", where an attacker engages the model in a series of conversations to gradually chip away at its restrictions. Over multiple back-and-forth exchanges, the attacker can manipulate the model into producing harmful or unintended output, despite the model's initial safety measures.
Researchers have investigated various jailbreaking techniques and evaluated their effectiveness against leading language models. Their findings suggest that current defensive strategies are not robust enough to withstand these sophisticated, multi-turn attacks.
This research highlights the need for more advanced safety mechanisms to protect these powerful AI systems as they become more widely deployed. Continued efforts to understand the evolving landscape of jailbreaking attacks and defenses will be crucial for ensuring the responsible development and deployment of frontier language models.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the vulnerability of frontier language models to multi-turn "jailbreak" attacks, where users can gradually bypass the models' safety controls through a series of conversational exchanges. The researchers developed various attack strategies, including prompt engineering, context manipulation, and iterative prompting, and evaluated their effectiveness against leading models like GPT-3 and InstructGPT.
The results indicate that current defenses are not robust enough to withstand these sophisticated, multi-turn attacks. The researchers found that attackers could gradually erode the models' safety constraints, leading to the production of harmful or unintended output despite the initial safeguards.
The paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the attack landscape, exploring different jailbreaking techniques and their impact on various defensive measures. The researchers also offer insights into the underlying mechanisms that enable these attacks, such as the models' sensitivity to contextual cues and the potential for language models to exhibit "brittle" behavior under adversarial conditions.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable contribution to the ongoing research on the security and safety of frontier language models. By systematically investigating the vulnerabilities of these systems to multi-turn jailbreak attacks, the researchers have highlighted the pressing need for more robust and adaptive defensive strategies.
However, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and areas for future research. For instance, the study focuses on a limited set of language models and attack strategies, and the researchers note the importance of exploring a wider range of models and attack vectors to fully understand the scope of the problem.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the ethical and societal implications of these vulnerabilities, which could be an important area for further investigation. As language models become more prevalent in various applications, understanding the potential for misuse and the development of appropriate safeguards will be crucial for ensuring the responsible deployment of these technologies.
Conclusion
The research presented in this paper underscores the emerging vulnerabilities in frontier language models, particularly their susceptibility to sophisticated, multi-turn jailbreak attacks. The findings suggest that current defensive measures are not sufficient to withstand these attacks, which can gradually erode the models' safety constraints and lead to the production of harmful or unintended output.
This work highlights the critical need for continued research and development of more advanced safety mechanisms to protect these powerful AI systems as they become more widely deployed. Ongoing efforts to understand the evolving landscape of jailbreaking attacks and defenses will be essential for ensuring the responsible and trustworthy development of frontier language models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Emerging Vulnerabilities in Frontier Models: Multi-Turn Jailbreak Attacks
Tom Gibbs, Ethan Kosak-Hine, George Ingebretsen, Jason Zhang, Julius Broomfield, Sara Pieri, Reihaneh Iranmanesh, Reihaneh Rabbany, Kellin Pelrine
Large language models (LLMs) are improving at an exceptional rate. However, these models are still susceptible to jailbreak attacks, which are becoming increasingly dangerous as models become increasingly powerful. In this work, we introduce a dataset of jailbreaks where each example can be input in both a single or a multi-turn format. We show that while equivalent in content, they are not equivalent in jailbreak success: defending against one structure does not guarantee defense against the other. Similarly, LLM-based filter guardrails also perform differently depending on not just the input content but the input structure. Thus, vulnerabilities of frontier models should be studied in both single and multi-turn settings; this dataset provides a tool to do so.
Read more9/4/2024
0
LLM Defenses Are Not Robust to Multi-Turn Human Jailbreaks Yet
Nathaniel Li, Ziwen Han, Ian Steneker, Willow Primack, Riley Goodside, Hugh Zhang, Zifan Wang, Cristina Menghini, Summer Yue
Recent large language model (LLM) defenses have greatly improved models' ability to refuse harmful queries, even when adversarially attacked. However, LLM defenses are primarily evaluated against automated adversarial attacks in a single turn of conversation, an insufficient threat model for real-world malicious use. We demonstrate that multi-turn human jailbreaks uncover significant vulnerabilities, exceeding 70% attack success rate (ASR) on HarmBench against defenses that report single-digit ASRs with automated single-turn attacks. Human jailbreaks also reveal vulnerabilities in machine unlearning defenses, successfully recovering dual-use biosecurity knowledge from unlearned models. We compile these results into Multi-Turn Human Jailbreaks (MHJ), a dataset of 2,912 prompts across 537 multi-turn jailbreaks. We publicly release MHJ alongside a compendium of jailbreak tactics developed across dozens of commercial red teaming engagements, supporting research towards stronger LLM defenses.
Read more9/5/2024
0
Multi-Turn Context Jailbreak Attack on Large Language Models From First Principles
Xiongtao Sun, Deyue Zhang, Dongdong Yang, Quanchen Zou, Hui Li
Large language models (LLMs) have significantly enhanced the performance of numerous applications, from intelligent conversations to text generation. However, their inherent security vulnerabilities have become an increasingly significant challenge, especially with respect to jailbreak attacks. Attackers can circumvent the security mechanisms of these LLMs, breaching security constraints and causing harmful outputs. Focusing on multi-turn semantic jailbreak attacks, we observe that existing methods lack specific considerations for the role of multiturn dialogues in attack strategies, leading to semantic deviations during continuous interactions. Therefore, in this paper, we establish a theoretical foundation for multi-turn attacks by considering their support in jailbreak attacks, and based on this, propose a context-based contextual fusion black-box jailbreak attack method, named Context Fusion Attack (CFA). This method approach involves filtering and extracting key terms from the target, constructing contextual scenarios around these terms, dynamically integrating the target into the scenarios, replacing malicious key terms within the target, and thereby concealing the direct malicious intent. Through comparisons on various mainstream LLMs and red team datasets, we have demonstrated CFA's superior success rate, divergence, and harmfulness compared to other multi-turn attack strategies, particularly showcasing significant advantages on Llama3 and GPT-4.
Read more8/12/2024
0
A Comprehensive Study of Jailbreak Attack versus Defense for Large Language Models
Zihao Xu, Yi Liu, Gelei Deng, Yuekang Li, Stjepan Picek
Large Language Models (LLMS) have increasingly become central to generating content with potential societal impacts. Notably, these models have demonstrated capabilities for generating content that could be deemed harmful. To mitigate these risks, researchers have adopted safety training techniques to align model outputs with societal values to curb the generation of malicious content. However, the phenomenon of jailbreaking, where carefully crafted prompts elicit harmful responses from models, persists as a significant challenge. This research conducts a comprehensive analysis of existing studies on jailbreaking LLMs and their defense techniques. We meticulously investigate nine attack techniques and seven defense techniques applied across three distinct language models: Vicuna, LLama, and GPT-3.5 Turbo. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of these attack and defense techniques. Our findings reveal that existing white-box attacks underperform compared to universal techniques and that including special tokens in the input significantly affects the likelihood of successful attacks. This research highlights the need to concentrate on the security facets of LLMs. Additionally, we contribute to the field by releasing our datasets and testing framework, aiming to foster further research into LLM security. We believe these contributions will facilitate the exploration of security measures within this domain.
Read more5/20/2024