Multilingual Blending: LLM Safety Alignment Evaluation with Language Mixture
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the use of language mixture to evaluate the safety alignment of large language models (LLMs).
- The researchers propose a novel approach called "Multilingual Blending" that combines prompts in multiple languages to assess the consistency and coherence of LLM responses.
- The goal is to identify potential safety issues that may arise when LLMs are used in diverse, multilingual settings.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on evaluating the safety and reliability of large language models (LLMs) when they are used in multilingual contexts. Large language models are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text, but they can also sometimes produce biased, inconsistent, or even unsafe responses, especially when faced with prompts or tasks that involve multiple languages.
The researchers developed a new technique called "Multilingual Blending" to address this challenge. The idea is to create prompts that mix multiple languages together, and then see how the LLM responds. By observing the model's behavior when faced with these multilingual prompts, the researchers can gain insights into the model's safety and alignment - in other words, how well the model's outputs match the intended goals and values.
This approach is important because many real-world applications of LLMs, such as digital assistants or translators, need to work seamlessly across different languages. If an LLM produces incoherent or unsafe responses when faced with multilingual inputs, it could lead to problematic outcomes. By using the Multilingual Blending technique, the researchers aim to identify and address these potential safety issues before LLMs are deployed in the real world.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel evaluation framework called "Multilingual Blending" to assess the safety and alignment of large language models (LLMs) in multilingual settings. The key idea is to create prompts that blend multiple languages together, and then observe how the LLM responds.
The researchers first curate a diverse set of prompts covering a range of topics and styles. They then create "blended" versions of these prompts by randomly mixing words and phrases from different languages, such as English, French, and Spanish. These blended prompts are then used to elicit responses from the LLM being evaluated.
By analyzing the coherence, consistency, and safety of the LLM's outputs across the multilingual prompts, the researchers can gain insights into the model's overall alignment and robustness. For example, if the LLM produces incoherent or contradictory responses when faced with blended prompts, it may indicate underlying safety issues that could manifest in real-world, multilingual applications.
The paper presents a detailed case study evaluating the performance of a popular LLM, GPT-3, using the Multilingual Blending approach. The results highlight several interesting patterns, such as the model's tendency to favor certain languages over others, and its challenges in maintaining coherence when prompts abruptly switch between languages.
Critical Analysis
The Multilingual Blending approach proposed in this paper is a valuable contribution to the field of LLM safety and alignment evaluation. By focusing on multilingual settings, the researchers tackle an important real-world challenge that has not been extensively explored in prior work.
One potential limitation of the study is the relatively small scale of the language blending experiments. While the paper provides a proof-of-concept, evaluating the approach with a wider range of languages, prompts, and LLM architectures would be beneficial to validate the generalizability of the findings.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the root causes of the observed safety issues, such as the influence of dataset composition, training procedures, or model architecture choices. Further research into the specific mechanisms driving these behaviors could lead to more targeted solutions for improving LLM safety and alignment.
Another area for exploration is the development of automated techniques for detecting and mitigating safety concerns identified through Multilingual Blending. The current approach relies on manual analysis, which may not scale well as the complexity and diversity of LLMs continue to grow.
Overall, the Multilingual Blending framework represents a promising step forward in evaluating the safety and robustness of large language models in real-world, multilingual settings. By continuing to build on this work, researchers and practitioners can work towards developing more reliable and trustworthy AI systems that can operate effectively in diverse linguistic environments.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel evaluation framework called "Multilingual Blending" that aims to assess the safety and alignment of large language models (LLMs) in multilingual settings. By creating prompts that blend multiple languages together, the researchers are able to uncover potential issues with the coherence, consistency, and safety of LLM outputs.
The case study on GPT-3 demonstrates the value of this approach, highlighting the model's challenges in maintaining coherence when faced with abrupt language switching. This work is an important step forward in ensuring that LLMs can be deployed safely and reliably in real-world, multilingual applications, such as digital assistants and language translation tools.
As the field of AI continues to evolve, techniques like Multilingual Blending will become increasingly crucial for identifying and addressing the safety and alignment challenges associated with large language models. By proactively addressing these issues, researchers and developers can work towards building more trustworthy and responsible AI systems that can benefit society as a whole.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Multilingual Blending: LLM Safety Alignment Evaluation with Language Mixture
Jiayang Song, Yuheng Huang, Zhehua Zhou, Lei Ma
As safety remains a crucial concern throughout the development lifecycle of Large Language Models (LLMs), researchers and industrial practitioners have increasingly focused on safeguarding and aligning LLM behaviors with human preferences and ethical standards. LLMs, trained on extensive multilingual corpora, exhibit powerful generalization abilities across diverse languages and domains. However, current safety alignment practices predominantly focus on single-language scenarios, which leaves their effectiveness in complex multilingual contexts, especially for those complex mixed-language formats, largely unexplored. In this study, we introduce Multilingual Blending, a mixed-language query-response scheme designed to evaluate the safety alignment of various state-of-the-art LLMs (e.g., GPT-4o, GPT-3.5, Llama3) under sophisticated, multilingual conditions. We further investigate language patterns such as language availability, morphology, and language family that could impact the effectiveness of Multilingual Blending in compromising the safeguards of LLMs. Our experimental results show that, without meticulously crafted prompt templates, Multilingual Blending significantly amplifies the detriment of malicious queries, leading to dramatically increased bypass rates in LLM safety alignment (67.23% on GPT-3.5 and 40.34% on GPT-4o), far exceeding those of single-language baselines. Moreover, the performance of Multilingual Blending varies notably based on intrinsic linguistic properties, with languages of different morphology and from diverse families being more prone to evading safety alignments. These findings underscore the necessity of evaluating LLMs and developing corresponding safety alignment strategies in a complex, multilingual context to align with their superior cross-language generalization capabilities.
Read more7/11/2024
💬
0
All Languages Matter: On the Multilingual Safety of Large Language Models
Wenxuan Wang, Zhaopeng Tu, Chang Chen, Youliang Yuan, Jen-tse Huang, Wenxiang Jiao, Michael R. Lyu
Safety lies at the core of developing and deploying large language models (LLMs). However, previous safety benchmarks only concern the safety in one language, e.g. the majority language in the pretraining data such as English. In this work, we build the first multilingual safety benchmark for LLMs, XSafety, in response to the global deployment of LLMs in practice. XSafety covers 14 kinds of commonly used safety issues across 10 languages that span several language families. We utilize XSafety to empirically study the multilingual safety for 4 widely-used LLMs, including both close-API and open-source models. Experimental results show that all LLMs produce significantly more unsafe responses for non-English queries than English ones, indicating the necessity of developing safety alignment for non-English languages. In addition, we propose several simple and effective prompting methods to improve the multilingual safety of ChatGPT by evoking safety knowledge and improving cross-lingual generalization of safety alignment. Our prompting method can significantly reduce the ratio of unsafe responses from 19.1% to 9.7% for non-English queries. We release our data at https://github.com/Jarviswang94/Multilingual_safety_benchmark.
Read more6/21/2024
0
MLLMGuard: A Multi-dimensional Safety Evaluation Suite for Multimodal Large Language Models
Tianle Gu, Zeyang Zhou, Kexin Huang, Dandan Liang, Yixu Wang, Haiquan Zhao, Yuanqi Yao, Xingge Qiao, Keqing Wang, Yujiu Yang, Yan Teng, Yu Qiao, Yingchun Wang
Powered by remarkable advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs), Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) demonstrate impressive capabilities in manifold tasks. However, the practical application scenarios of MLLMs are intricate, exposing them to potential malicious instructions and thereby posing safety risks. While current benchmarks do incorporate certain safety considerations, they often lack comprehensive coverage and fail to exhibit the necessary rigor and robustness. For instance, the common practice of employing GPT-4V as both the evaluator and a model to be evaluated lacks credibility, as it tends to exhibit a bias toward its own responses. In this paper, we present MLLMGuard, a multidimensional safety evaluation suite for MLLMs, including a bilingual image-text evaluation dataset, inference utilities, and a lightweight evaluator. MLLMGuard's assessment comprehensively covers two languages (English and Chinese) and five important safety dimensions (Privacy, Bias, Toxicity, Truthfulness, and Legality), each with corresponding rich subtasks. Focusing on these dimensions, our evaluation dataset is primarily sourced from platforms such as social media, and it integrates text-based and image-based red teaming techniques with meticulous annotation by human experts. This can prevent inaccurate evaluation caused by data leakage when using open-source datasets and ensures the quality and challenging nature of our benchmark. Additionally, a fully automated lightweight evaluator termed GuardRank is developed, which achieves significantly higher evaluation accuracy than GPT-4. Our evaluation results across 13 advanced models indicate that MLLMs still have a substantial journey ahead before they can be considered safe and responsible.
Read more6/14/2024
0
SLM as Guardian: Pioneering AI Safety with Small Language Models
Ohjoon Kwon, Donghyeon Jeon, Nayoung Choi, Gyu-Hwung Cho, Changbong Kim, Hyunwoo Lee, Inho Kang, Sun Kim, Taiwoo Park
Most prior safety research of large language models (LLMs) has focused on enhancing the alignment of LLMs to better suit the safety requirements of humans. However, internalizing such safeguard features into larger models brought challenges of higher training cost and unintended degradation of helpfulness. To overcome such challenges, a modular approach employing a smaller LLM to detect harmful user queries is regarded as a convenient solution in designing LLM-based system with safety requirements. In this paper, we leverage a smaller LLM for both harmful query detection and safeguard response generation. We introduce our safety requirements and the taxonomy of harmfulness categories, and then propose a multi-task learning mechanism fusing the two tasks into a single model. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, providing on par or surpassing harmful query detection and safeguard response performance compared to the publicly available LLMs.
Read more5/31/2024