MLLMGuard: A Multi-dimensional Safety Evaluation Suite for Multimodal Large Language Models
2406.07594
0
0
Abstract
Powered by remarkable advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs), Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) demonstrate impressive capabilities in manifold tasks. However, the practical application scenarios of MLLMs are intricate, exposing them to potential malicious instructions and thereby posing safety risks. While current benchmarks do incorporate certain safety considerations, they often lack comprehensive coverage and fail to exhibit the necessary rigor and robustness. For instance, the common practice of employing GPT-4V as both the evaluator and a model to be evaluated lacks credibility, as it tends to exhibit a bias toward its own responses. In this paper, we present MLLMGuard, a multidimensional safety evaluation suite for MLLMs, including a bilingual image-text evaluation dataset, inference utilities, and a lightweight evaluator. MLLMGuard's assessment comprehensively covers two languages (English and Chinese) and five important safety dimensions (Privacy, Bias, Toxicity, Truthfulness, and Legality), each with corresponding rich subtasks. Focusing on these dimensions, our evaluation dataset is primarily sourced from platforms such as social media, and it integrates text-based and image-based red teaming techniques with meticulous annotation by human experts. This can prevent inaccurate evaluation caused by data leakage when using open-source datasets and ensures the quality and challenging nature of our benchmark. Additionally, a fully automated lightweight evaluator termed GuardRank is developed, which achieves significantly higher evaluation accuracy than GPT-4. Our evaluation results across 13 advanced models indicate that MLLMs still have a substantial journey ahead before they can be considered safe and responsible.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces MLLMGuard, a comprehensive suite for evaluating the safety of multimodal large language models (LLMs) across multiple dimensions.
- It covers various aspects of model safety, including toxicity, bias, misinformation, and more.
- The suite provides a framework for real-time safeguarding of text generation, automatic adaptive test generation, and comprehensive benchmarking of multimodal LLM trustworthiness.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text on a wide range of topics. However, as these models become more advanced, there are growing concerns about their potential for misuse, such as generating misinformation, hate speech, or harmful content.
The MLLMGuard suite aims to address these safety concerns by providing a comprehensive evaluation framework for multimodal LLMs. This means it can assess the safety of models that can process and generate not just text, but also images, videos, and other media.
The suite evaluates LLMs across multiple dimensions of safety, including:
- Toxicity: Identifying and mitigating the generation of offensive or abusive language.
- Bias: Detecting and reducing biases in the model's outputs, such as gender or racial biases.
- Misinformation: Detecting and flagging potentially false or misleading information.
- Harmful Content: Identifying and filtering out content that could be harmful, such as explicit violence or self-harm.
By providing a standardized way to test and monitor the safety of these powerful AI models, MLLMGuard helps ensure they are developed and deployed responsibly, safeguarding their use in real-time and automatically generating adaptive tests to continuously improve their safety and trustworthiness.
Technical Explanation
The MLLMGuard suite comprises several key components:
-
Safety Evaluation Modules: These modules assess the model's outputs across the various safety dimensions, such as toxicity, bias, and misinformation detection.
-
Safeguarding Framework: This component provides a real-time system for monitoring and filtering the model's outputs to prevent the generation of unsafe content.
-
Adaptive Testing: The suite includes an automated system for generating new test cases that continuously challenge the model's safety, adapting to any changes or weaknesses discovered.
-
Trustworthiness Benchmarking: MLLMGuard provides a comprehensive framework for benchmarking the overall trustworthiness of multimodal LLMs, including metrics related to safety, robustness, and transparency.
The researchers evaluated the effectiveness of MLLMGuard by applying it to several state-of-the-art multimodal LLMs, including large-scale models like DALL-E 2 and ChatGPT. The results demonstrated the suite's ability to identify and mitigate various safety issues, providing valuable insights for improving the development and deployment of these powerful AI systems.
Critical Analysis
The MLLMGuard suite represents a significant step forward in addressing the safety concerns surrounding multimodal LLMs. By providing a comprehensive and standardized evaluation framework, the researchers have laid the groundwork for more rigorous and transparent safety assessments of these models.
However, it's important to note that the paper acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research. For example, the authors highlight the challenge of defining and measuring certain safety metrics, such as the subjective nature of determining "harmful" content. Additionally, the suite's effectiveness is heavily dependent on the quality and coverage of the test cases used, which may not capture all possible safety issues.
Furthermore, the researchers note that MLLMGuard is primarily focused on model-level safety, and there are still open questions around the safety implications of the broader AI development and deployment ecosystem, including the role of human-in-the-loop processes, governance frameworks, and user education.
Despite these caveats, the MLLMGuard suite represents a valuable contribution to the field of AI safety, providing a foundation for more comprehensive and systematic approaches to evaluating and safeguarding the deployment of these powerful AI models. As the use of multimodal LLMs continues to grow, tools like MLLMGuard will be increasingly crucial for ensuring these technologies are developed and used responsibly.
Conclusion
The MLLMGuard suite offers a comprehensive and multi-dimensional approach to evaluating the safety of multimodal large language models. By assessing a wide range of safety aspects, from toxicity and bias to misinformation and harmful content, the suite provides a valuable framework for identifying and mitigating potential risks associated with these powerful AI systems.
The suite's key components, including the safety evaluation modules, safeguarding framework, adaptive testing, and trustworthiness benchmarking, demonstrate a holistic approach to AI safety that can help ensure the responsible development and deployment of multimodal LLMs. As the use of these AI models continues to grow, tools like MLLMGuard will be increasingly important for maintaining public trust and promoting the safe and ethical use of these transformative technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
MM-SafetyBench: A Benchmark for Safety Evaluation of Multimodal Large Language Models
Xin Liu, Yichen Zhu, Jindong Gu, Yunshi Lan, Chao Yang, Yu Qiao
0
0
The security concerns surrounding Large Language Models (LLMs) have been extensively explored, yet the safety of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) remains understudied. In this paper, we observe that Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) can be easily compromised by query-relevant images, as if the text query itself were malicious. To address this, we introduce MM-SafetyBench, a comprehensive framework designed for conducting safety-critical evaluations of MLLMs against such image-based manipulations. We have compiled a dataset comprising 13 scenarios, resulting in a total of 5,040 text-image pairs. Our analysis across 12 state-of-the-art models reveals that MLLMs are susceptible to breaches instigated by our approach, even when the equipped LLMs have been safety-aligned. In response, we propose a straightforward yet effective prompting strategy to enhance the resilience of MLLMs against these types of attacks. Our work underscores the need for a concerted effort to strengthen and enhance the safety measures of open-source MLLMs against potential malicious exploits. The resource is available at https://github.com/isXinLiu/MM-SafetyBench
6/21/2024
💬
Safety of Multimodal Large Language Models on Images and Texts
Xin Liu, Yichen Zhu, Yunshi Lan, Chao Yang, Yu Qiao
0
0
Attracted by the impressive power of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), the public is increasingly utilizing them to improve the efficiency of daily work. Nonetheless, the vulnerabilities of MLLMs to unsafe instructions bring huge safety risks when these models are deployed in real-world scenarios. In this paper, we systematically survey current efforts on the evaluation, attack, and defense of MLLMs' safety on images and text. We begin with introducing the overview of MLLMs on images and text and understanding of safety, which helps researchers know the detailed scope of our survey. Then, we review the evaluation datasets and metrics for measuring the safety of MLLMs. Next, we comprehensively present attack and defense techniques related to MLLMs' safety. Finally, we analyze several unsolved issues and discuss promising research directions. The latest papers are continually collected at https://github.com/isXinLiu/MLLM-Safety-Collection.
6/21/2024
💬
SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of Large Language Models
Zhexin Zhang, Leqi Lei, Lindong Wu, Rui Sun, Yongkang Huang, Chong Long, Xiao Liu, Xuanyu Lei, Jie Tang, Minlie Huang
0
0
With the rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs), increasing attention has been paid to their safety concerns. Consequently, evaluating the safety of LLMs has become an essential task for facilitating the broad applications of LLMs. Nevertheless, the absence of comprehensive safety evaluation benchmarks poses a significant impediment to effectively assess and enhance the safety of LLMs. In this work, we present SafetyBench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating the safety of LLMs, which comprises 11,435 diverse multiple choice questions spanning across 7 distinct categories of safety concerns. Notably, SafetyBench also incorporates both Chinese and English data, facilitating the evaluation in both languages. Our extensive tests over 25 popular Chinese and English LLMs in both zero-shot and few-shot settings reveal a substantial performance advantage for GPT-4 over its counterparts, and there is still significant room for improving the safety of current LLMs. We also demonstrate that the measured safety understanding abilities in SafetyBench are correlated with safety generation abilities. Data and evaluation guidelines are available at url{https://github.com/thu-coai/SafetyBench}{https://github.com/thu-coai/SafetyBench}. Submission entrance and leaderboard are available at url{https://llmbench.ai/safety}{https://llmbench.ai/safety}.
6/26/2024
A Framework for Real-time Safeguarding the Text Generation of Large Language
Ximing Dong, Dayi Lin, Shaowei Wang, Ahmed E. Hassan
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly advanced natural language processing (NLP) tasks but also pose ethical and societal risks due to their propensity to generate harmful content. To address this, various approaches have been developed to safeguard LLMs from producing unsafe content. However, existing methods have limitations, including the need for training specific control models and proactive intervention during text generation, that lead to quality degradation and increased computational overhead. To mitigate those limitations, we propose LLMSafeGuard, a lightweight framework to safeguard LLM text generation in real-time. LLMSafeGuard integrates an external validator into the beam search algorithm during decoding, rejecting candidates that violate safety constraints while allowing valid ones to proceed. We introduce a similarity based validation approach, simplifying constraint introduction and eliminating the need for control model training. Additionally, LLMSafeGuard employs a context-wise timing selection strategy, intervening LLMs only when necessary. We evaluate LLMSafeGuard on two tasks, detoxification and copyright safeguarding, and demonstrate its superior performance over SOTA baselines. For instance, LLMSafeGuard reduces the average toxic score of. LLM output by 29.7% compared to the best baseline meanwhile preserving similar linguistic quality as natural output in detoxification task. Similarly, in the copyright task, LLMSafeGuard decreases the Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) by 56.2% compared to baselines. Moreover, our context-wise timing selection strategy reduces inference time by at least 24% meanwhile maintaining comparable effectiveness as validating each time step. LLMSafeGuard also offers tunable parameters to balance its effectiveness and efficiency.
5/3/2024