Multimodal Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Comprehensive Review of Methodological Advances and Future Research Directions

Read original: arXiv:2306.05731 - Published 7/2/2024 by Nikolaos Rodis, Christos Sardianos, Panagiotis Radoglou-Grammatikis, Panagiotis Sarigiannidis, Iraklis Varlamis, Georgios Th. Papadopoulos
Total Score

0

🧠

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the field of Multimodal Explainable AI (MXAI), which aims to provide meaningful explanations for AI models that use multiple data sources (modalities) in their prediction tasks.
  • The paper systematically analyzes recent advancements in MXAI, including the AI-based prediction tasks, publicly available datasets, and the various MXAI methods and evaluation metrics.
  • Additionally, the paper discusses current challenges and future research directions in the MXAI domain.

Plain English Explanation

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has achieved remarkable results in many data analysis tasks. However, these AI systems often lack transparency and trustworthiness, making it difficult to understand how they arrive at their predictions. To address this issue, the field of eXplainable AI (XAI) has emerged, which focuses on providing meaningful explanations for the reasoning behind these AI models.

This paper specifically focuses on Multimodal XAI (MXAI), which involves AI models that use multiple types of data (modalities) to make their predictions. For example, an MXAI system might use both text and images to classify a scene. The paper systematically examines the recent advancements in MXAI, including the types of prediction tasks, the datasets used to train and evaluate these models, and the various MXAI methods that have been developed.

The paper analyzes the MXAI methods based on factors such as the number of modalities involved, the stage of the process where explanations are generated, and the specific techniques used to produce the explanations. Additionally, the paper reviews the metrics used to evaluate the quality and effectiveness of the MXAI methods.

Finally, the paper discusses the current challenges and future research directions in the MXAI field. This includes addressing the need for more human-centric explanations and deriving optimal explanations for complex deep neural networks.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by highlighting the significant progress made by Artificial Intelligence (AI) in various data analysis tasks, but also acknowledges the accompanying shortcomings in the transparency and trustworthiness of the developed AI systems. To address this challenge, the field of eXplainable AI (XAI) has emerged, which aims to provide meaningful explanations for the employed model reasoning process.

The current study focuses on systematically analyzing the recent advancements in the area of Multimodal XAI (MXAI), which involves methods that utilize multiple data modalities (e.g., text, images, audio) in both the primary prediction and explanation tasks. The paper first describes the relevant AI-boosted prediction tasks and publicly available datasets used for learning and evaluating explanations in multimodal scenarios.

Next, the paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the MXAI methods in the literature, considering the following key criteria:

  1. The number of modalities involved in the employed AI module.
  2. The processing stage at which explanations are generated (e.g., during the prediction task, after the prediction task).
  3. The type of methodology (i.e., the actual mechanism and mathematical formalization) used for producing the explanations.

The paper then performs a thorough analysis of the metrics used for evaluating the performance of MXAI methods, such as explanatory accuracy, interpretability, and faithfulness to the original model.

Finally, the paper delves into an extensive discussion of the current challenges and future research directions in the MXAI domain. This includes addressing the need for more human-centric explanations, deriving optimal explanations for complex deep neural networks, and focusing on explaining the model's reasoning process rather than justifying its predictions.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a comprehensive and systematic analysis of the Multimodal Explainable AI (MXAI) field, highlighting the recent advancements and the challenges that still need to be addressed. One key limitation mentioned in the paper is the need for more human-centric explanations that are tailored to the end-user's needs and preferences, rather than solely focusing on technical explanations.

Additionally, the paper acknowledges the complexity of deriving optimal explanations for deep neural networks, which are often considered "black boxes" due to their intricate and non-linear decision-making processes. The authors suggest that further research is needed to solve this "enigma" and derive more interpretable and faithful explanations for these advanced AI models.

While the paper provides a thorough review of the MXAI field, it could have also discussed the potential challenges and limitations of the various MXAI methods themselves, such as the computational overhead, the potential for bias in the explanations, and the scalability of these methods to larger and more complex datasets.

Overall, the paper serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners interested in the field of Explainable AI, particularly in the context of multimodal AI systems. The insights and future research directions outlined in the paper can help guide the development of more transparent and trustworthy AI solutions.

Conclusion

This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the recent advancements in the field of Multimodal Explainable AI (MXAI), which aims to provide meaningful explanations for AI models that utilize multiple data modalities in their prediction tasks. The paper systematically examines the relevant AI-boosted prediction tasks, publicly available datasets, and the various MXAI methods and evaluation metrics.

The key insights from the paper include the need for more human-centric explanations, the challenges in deriving optimal explanations for complex deep neural networks, and the importance of focusing on explaining the model's reasoning process rather than simply justifying its predictions.

The analysis and discussion presented in this paper can help guide future research and development in the Explainable AI domain, particularly in the context of multimodal AI systems. As the use of AI continues to grow, the ability to understand and trust these systems will become increasingly critical, making the advancements in MXAI a valuable contribution to the field.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🧠

Total Score

0

Multimodal Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Comprehensive Review of Methodological Advances and Future Research Directions

Nikolaos Rodis, Christos Sardianos, Panagiotis Radoglou-Grammatikis, Panagiotis Sarigiannidis, Iraklis Varlamis, Georgios Th. Papadopoulos

Despite the fact that Artificial Intelligence (AI) has boosted the achievement of remarkable results across numerous data analysis tasks, however, this is typically accompanied by a significant shortcoming in the exhibited transparency and trustworthiness of the developed systems. In order to address the latter challenge, the so-called eXplainable AI (XAI) research field has emerged, which aims, among others, at estimating meaningful explanations regarding the employed model reasoning process. The current study focuses on systematically analyzing the recent advances in the area of Multimodal XAI (MXAI), which comprises methods that involve multiple modalities in the primary prediction and explanation tasks. In particular, the relevant AI-boosted prediction tasks and publicly available datasets used for learning/evaluating explanations in multimodal scenarios are initially described. Subsequently, a systematic and comprehensive analysis of the MXAI methods of the literature is provided, taking into account the following key criteria: a) The number of the involved modalities (in the employed AI module), b) The processing stage at which explanations are generated, and c) The type of the adopted methodology (i.e. the actual mechanism and mathematical formalization) for producing explanations. Then, a thorough analysis of the metrics used for MXAI methods evaluation is performed. Finally, an extensive discussion regarding the current challenges and future research directions is provided.

Read more

7/2/2024

Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Survey of Needs, Techniques, Applications, and Future Direction
Total Score

0

Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Survey of Needs, Techniques, Applications, and Future Direction

Melkamu Mersha, Khang Lam, Joseph Wood, Ali AlShami, Jugal Kalita

Artificial intelligence models encounter significant challenges due to their black-box nature, particularly in safety-critical domains such as healthcare, finance, and autonomous vehicles. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) addresses these challenges by providing explanations for how these models make decisions and predictions, ensuring transparency, accountability, and fairness. Existing studies have examined the fundamental concepts of XAI, its general principles, and the scope of XAI techniques. However, there remains a gap in the literature as there are no comprehensive reviews that delve into the detailed mathematical representations, design methodologies of XAI models, and other associated aspects. This paper provides a comprehensive literature review encompassing common terminologies and definitions, the need for XAI, beneficiaries of XAI, a taxonomy of XAI methods, and the application of XAI methods in different application areas. The survey is aimed at XAI researchers, XAI practitioners, AI model developers, and XAI beneficiaries who are interested in enhancing the trustworthiness, transparency, accountability, and fairness of their AI models.

Read more

9/4/2024

Explainable AI needs formal notions of explanation correctness
Total Score

0

Explainable AI needs formal notions of explanation correctness

Stefan Haufe, Rick Wilming, Benedict Clark, Rustam Zhumagambetov, Danny Panknin, Ahc`ene Boubekki

The use of machine learning (ML) in critical domains such as medicine poses risks and requires regulation. One requirement is that decisions of ML systems in high-risk applications should be human-understandable. The field of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) seemingly addresses this need. However, in its current form, XAI is unfit to provide quality control for ML; it itself needs scrutiny. Popular XAI methods cannot reliably answer important questions about ML models, their training data, or a given test input. We recapitulate results demonstrating that popular XAI methods systematically attribute importance to input features that are independent of the prediction target. This limits their utility for purposes such as model and data (in)validation, model improvement, and scientific discovery. We argue that the fundamental reason for this limitation is that current XAI methods do not address well-defined problems and are not evaluated against objective criteria of explanation correctness. Researchers should formally define the problems they intend to solve first and then design methods accordingly. This will lead to notions of explanation correctness that can be theoretically verified and objective metrics of explanation performance that can be assessed using ground-truth data.

Read more

9/27/2024

Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Multicollinearity : A Mini Review of Current Approaches
Total Score

0

Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Multicollinearity : A Mini Review of Current Approaches

Ahmed M Salih

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods help to understand the internal mechanism of machine learning models and how they reach a specific decision or made a specific action. The list of informative features is one of the most common output of XAI methods. Multicollinearity is one of the big issue that should be considered when XAI generates the explanation in terms of the most informative features in an AI system. No review has been dedicated to investigate the current approaches to handle such significant issue. In this paper, we provide a review of the current state-of-the-art approaches in relation to the XAI in the context of recent advances in dealing with the multicollinearity issue. To do so, we searched in three repositories that are: Web of Science, Scopus and IEEE Xplore to find pertinent published papers. After excluding irrelevant papers, seven papers were considered in the review. In addition, we discuss the current XAI methods and their limitations in dealing with the multicollinearity and suggest future directions.

Read more

6/18/2024