The future of human-centric eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is not post-hoc explanations
2307.00364
0
0
Abstract
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) plays a crucial role in enabling human understanding and trust in deep learning systems. As models get larger, more ubiquitous, and pervasive in aspects of daily life, explainability is necessary to minimize adverse effects of model mistakes. Unfortunately, current approaches in human-centric XAI (e.g. predictive tasks in healthcare, education, or personalized ads) tend to rely on a single post-hoc explainer, whereas recent work has identified systematic disagreement between post-hoc explainers when applied to the same instances of underlying black-box models. In this paper, we therefore present a call for action to address the limitations of current state-of-the-art explainers. We propose a shift from post-hoc explainability to designing interpretable neural network architectures. We identify five needs of human-centric XAI (real-time, accurate, actionable, human-interpretable, and consistent) and propose two schemes for interpretable-by-design neural network workflows (adaptive routing with InterpretCC and temporal diagnostics with I2MD). We postulate that the future of human-centric XAI is neither in explaining black-boxes nor in reverting to traditional, interpretable models, but in neural networks that are intrinsically interpretable.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper discusses the limitations of post-hoc explanations in eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) and proposes a new approach for developing human-centric XAI systems.
- The authors argue that current XAI methods, which generate explanations after the model has made a decision, are not sufficient for building systems that are truly aligned with human values and needs.
- Instead, the paper advocates for a shift towards "intrinsic explainability," where the AI model's decision-making process is inherently understandable and aligned with human-centric principles from the ground up.
Plain English Explanation
The paper argues that the current approach to eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is not enough to create AI systems that truly understand and align with human values. Today's XAI methods typically generate explanations after the AI model has already made a decision, but the authors believe this "post-hoc" approach is flawed.
Instead, the paper suggests that the future of human-centric XAI lies in developing AI models whose decision-making process is inherently understandable and aligned with human-centered principles from the beginning. This "intrinsic explainability" would allow the AI to make decisions in a way that is transparent and meaningful to humans, rather than just trying to explain its actions after the fact.
The authors use analogies to help explain their ideas. For example, they compare post-hoc XAI to a person who solves a complex math problem and then tries to explain their thought process afterwards. In contrast, intrinsic explainability would be like the person showing their work and thought process as they solve the problem step-by-step.
By shifting towards this new paradigm of intrinsic explainability, the researchers believe we can create AI systems that are truly designed with human values and needs in mind, rather than just trying to retrofit explanations onto systems that were not originally built that way.
Technical Explanation
The paper argues that current eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods, which generate post-hoc explanations after an AI model has made a decision, are insufficient for building human-centric AI systems. The authors propose a shift towards "intrinsic explainability," where the AI model's decision-making process is inherently understandable and aligned with human-centric principles from the ground up.
The paper draws parallels to the Solving the Enigma and LIME approaches, which aim to provide explanations for deep neural networks. However, the authors argue that these post-hoc methods can give users a "false sense of security" about the reliability and trustworthiness of the AI system.
Instead, the paper advocates for a shift towards "intrinsic explainability," where the AI model's decision-making process is inherently understandable and aligned with human-centric principles from the beginning. This would involve designing the AI architecture and training process to prioritize human-interpretable decision-making, rather than just trying to explain the model's actions after the fact.
The authors use analogies to help explain their ideas, such as comparing post-hoc XAI to a person solving a complex math problem and then trying to explain their thought process afterwards, versus intrinsic explainability being like the person showing their work and thought process as they solve the problem step-by-step.
Critical Analysis
The paper raises valid concerns about the limitations of current post-hoc XAI methods and the need for a more human-centric approach to developing AI systems. The authors make a compelling case for the importance of "intrinsic explainability," where the AI model's decision-making process is inherently understandable and aligned with human values from the start.
However, the paper does not provide a detailed roadmap or specific techniques for how to achieve this shift in the field of XAI. The authors acknowledge that this will require fundamental changes to the way AI systems are designed and trained, but more research will be needed to explore the practical implementation of their proposed approach.
Additionally, the paper does not address the potential challenges and trade-offs involved in balancing the need for human-centric explainability with other important AI system requirements, such as performance, scalability, and robustness. Careful consideration will be required to ensure that the pursuit of intrinsic explainability does not come at the expense of other critical aspects of AI development.
Overall, the paper makes a compelling argument for the need to rethink the current approaches to XAI and move towards more human-centric and transparent AI systems. The ideas presented in this paper provide a valuable starting point for further research and discussion on the future of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence.
Conclusion
The paper argues that the future of human-centric eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) lies not in post-hoc explanations, but in the development of AI systems with "intrinsic explainability." This means designing the AI's decision-making process to be inherently understandable and aligned with human-centric principles from the ground up, rather than just trying to explain the model's actions after the fact.
The authors make a compelling case for the limitations of current post-hoc XAI methods and the need for a fundamental shift in how we approach the development of AI systems. By prioritizing intrinsic explainability, the researchers believe we can create AI that is truly designed with human values and needs in mind, rather than just attempting to retrofit explanations onto systems that were not originally built that way.
While the paper does not provide a detailed roadmap for achieving this shift, it lays the groundwork for further research and discussion on the future of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence and the critical importance of developing AI systems that are transparent, trustworthy, and aligned with human-centric principles.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Privacy Implications of Explainable AI in Data-Driven Systems
Fatima Ezzeddine
0
0
Machine learning (ML) models, demonstrably powerful, suffer from a lack of interpretability. The absence of transparency, often referred to as the black box nature of ML models, undermines trust and urges the need for efforts to enhance their explainability. Explainable AI (XAI) techniques address this challenge by providing frameworks and methods to explain the internal decision-making processes of these complex models. Techniques like Counterfactual Explanations (CF) and Feature Importance play a crucial role in achieving this goal. Furthermore, high-quality and diverse data remains the foundational element for robust and trustworthy ML applications. In many applications, the data used to train ML and XAI explainers contain sensitive information. In this context, numerous privacy-preserving techniques can be employed to safeguard sensitive information in the data, such as differential privacy. Subsequently, a conflict between XAI and privacy solutions emerges due to their opposing goals. Since XAI techniques provide reasoning for the model behavior, they reveal information relative to ML models, such as their decision boundaries, the values of features, or the gradients of deep learning models when explanations are exposed to a third entity. Attackers can initiate privacy breaching attacks using these explanations, to perform model extraction, inference, and membership attacks. This dilemma underscores the challenge of finding the right equilibrium between understanding ML decision-making and safeguarding privacy.
6/26/2024
🤖
Explaining AI Decisions: Towards Achieving Human-Centered Explainability in Smart Home Environments
Md Shajalal, Alexander Boden, Gunnar Stevens, Delong Du, Dean-Robin Kern
0
0
Smart home systems are gaining popularity as homeowners strive to enhance their living and working environments while minimizing energy consumption. However, the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled decision-making models in smart home systems faces challenges due to the complexity and black-box nature of these systems, leading to concerns about explainability, trust, transparency, accountability, and fairness. The emerging field of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) addresses these issues by providing explanations for the models' decisions and actions. While state-of-the-art XAI methods are beneficial for AI developers and practitioners, they may not be easily understood by general users, particularly household members. This paper advocates for human-centered XAI methods, emphasizing the importance of delivering readily comprehensible explanations to enhance user satisfaction and drive the adoption of smart home systems. We review state-of-the-art XAI methods and prior studies focusing on human-centered explanations for general users in the context of smart home applications. Through experiments on two smart home application scenarios, we demonstrate that explanations generated by prominent XAI techniques might not be effective in helping users understand and make decisions. We thus argue for the necessity of a human-centric approach in representing explanations in smart home systems and highlight relevant human-computer interaction (HCI) methodologies, including user studies, prototyping, technology probes analysis, and heuristic evaluation, that can be employed to generate and present human-centered explanations to users.
4/26/2024
🤔
Logic-Based Explainability: Past, Present & Future
Joao Marques-Silva
0
0
In recent years, the impact of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) in society has been absolutely remarkable. This impact is expected to continue in the foreseeable future. However,the adoption of AI/ML is also a cause of grave concern. The operation of the most advances AI/ML models is often beyond the grasp of human decision makers. As a result, decisions that impact humans may not be understood and may lack rigorous validation. Explainable AI (XAI) is concerned with providing human decision-makers with understandable explanations for the predictions made by ML models. As a result, XAI is a cornerstone of trustworthy AI. Despite its strategic importance, most work on XAI lacks rigor, and so its use in high-risk or safety-critical domains serves to foster distrust instead of contributing to build much-needed trust. Logic-based XAI has recently emerged as a rigorous alternative to those other non-rigorous methods of XAI. This paper provides a technical survey of logic-based XAI, its origins, the current topics of research, and emerging future topics of research. The paper also highlights the many myths that pervade non-rigorous approaches for XAI.
6/19/2024
Solving the enigma: Deriving optimal explanations of deep networks
Michail Mamalakis, Antonios Mamalakis, Ingrid Agartz, Lynn Egeland M{o}rch-Johnsen, Graham Murray, John Suckling, Pietro Lio
0
0
The accelerated progress of artificial intelligence (AI) has popularized deep learning models across domains, yet their inherent opacity poses challenges, notably in critical fields like healthcare, medicine and the geosciences. Explainable AI (XAI) has emerged to shed light on these black box models, helping decipher their decision making process. Nevertheless, different XAI methods yield highly different explanations. This inter-method variability increases uncertainty and lowers trust in deep networks' predictions. In this study, for the first time, we propose a novel framework designed to enhance the explainability of deep networks, by maximizing both the accuracy and the comprehensibility of the explanations. Our framework integrates various explanations from established XAI methods and employs a non-linear explanation optimizer to construct a unique and optimal explanation. Through experiments on multi-class and binary classification tasks in 2D object and 3D neuroscience imaging, we validate the efficacy of our approach. Our explanation optimizer achieved superior faithfulness scores, averaging 155% and 63% higher than the best performing XAI method in the 3D and 2D applications, respectively. Additionally, our approach yielded lower complexity, increasing comprehensibility. Our results suggest that optimal explanations based on specific criteria are derivable and address the issue of inter-method variability in the current XAI literature.
5/17/2024