Multimodal Learning Without Labeled Multimodal Data: Guarantees and Applications
0
🎲
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This research paper explores the challenge of understanding how different data modalities (e.g., images and captions, video and audio) interact to provide new task-relevant information that is not present in either modality alone.
- The researchers study this challenge in a semi-supervised setting, where only labeled unimodal data and unlabeled multimodal data are available, as labeling multimodal data can be time-consuming.
- The key contribution is the derivation of lower and upper bounds to quantify the amount of multimodal interactions in this semi-supervised setting.
Plain English Explanation
When machine learning systems are trained on multiple types of data, such as images and captions or video and audio, the different data modalities can interact in ways that provide new, valuable information that wasn't present in either modality alone. Understanding these multimodal interactions is an important research question in the field.
However, fully labeling multimodal data, where each instance has labels for all modalities, can be very time-consuming. This research focuses on a more realistic scenario where only some of the data is fully labeled, while the rest of the multimodal data is unlabeled.
The researchers developed mathematical techniques to quantify the amount of useful information that arises from the interactions between modalities in this semi-supervised setting. They derived lower and upper bounds on the level of these multimodal interactions, which can help guide decisions around data collection, model selection, and performance estimation for various tasks.
Technical Explanation
The researchers used an information-theoretic approach to define and quantify multimodal interactions. They derived two lower bounds on the amount of multimodal interactions:
- One based on the shared information between modalities, which captures the overlap in information content.
- Another based on the disagreement between separately trained unimodal classifiers, which measures how much the modalities provide complementary information.
They also derived an upper bound on multimodal interactions by connecting it to approximate algorithms for min-entropy couplings.
The researchers validated these bounds empirically and showed that they accurately track the true level of multimodal interactions. They also demonstrated how these theoretical results can be used to estimate multimodal model performance, guide data collection, and select appropriate multimodal models for various tasks.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous, information-theoretic approach to quantifying multimodal interactions, which is a important and understudied challenge in the field of multimodal machine learning. The derived bounds offer a principled way to understand the value that multiple data modalities can bring to a learning task.
One potential limitation is that the analysis assumes the availability of labeled unimodal data, which may not always be the case in real-world scenarios. It would be interesting to see how the framework could be extended to handle settings with limited or no labeled data for any modality.
Additionally, the paper focuses on pairwise interactions between modalities, but in many real-world applications, there may be complex, higher-order interactions among three or more modalities. Expanding the analysis to handle these more complex multimodal relationships could be a valuable area for future research.
Overall, this work provides a strong theoretical foundation for understanding multimodal interactions and offers practical guidance for designing and evaluating multimodal machine learning systems.
Conclusion
This research paper presents an innovative approach to quantifying the level of useful multimodal interactions in a semi-supervised setting, where only some of the data is fully labeled. The derived lower and upper bounds offer a principled way to measure the value that multiple data modalities can bring to a learning task, which can inform decisions around data collection, model selection, and performance estimation.
The techniques developed in this work contribute to a deeper understanding of multimodal machine learning and provide a solid theoretical basis for designing and evaluating more effective multimodal systems across a wide range of applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🎲
0
Multimodal Learning Without Labeled Multimodal Data: Guarantees and Applications
Paul Pu Liang, Chun Kai Ling, Yun Cheng, Alex Obolenskiy, Yudong Liu, Rohan Pandey, Alex Wilf, Louis-Philippe Morency, Ruslan Salakhutdinov
In many machine learning systems that jointly learn from multiple modalities, a core research question is to understand the nature of multimodal interactions: how modalities combine to provide new task-relevant information that was not present in either alone. We study this challenge of interaction quantification in a semi-supervised setting with only labeled unimodal data and naturally co-occurring multimodal data (e.g., unlabeled images and captions, video and corresponding audio) but when labeling them is time-consuming. Using a precise information-theoretic definition of interactions, our key contribution is the derivation of lower and upper bounds to quantify the amount of multimodal interactions in this semi-supervised setting. We propose two lower bounds: one based on the shared information between modalities and the other based on disagreement between separately trained unimodal classifiers, and derive an upper bound through connections to approximate algorithms for min-entropy couplings. We validate these estimated bounds and show how they accurately track true interactions. Finally, we show how these theoretical results can be used to estimate multimodal model performance, guide data collection, and select appropriate multimodal models for various tasks.
Read more6/14/2024
📶
0
On Stronger Computational Separations Between Multimodal and Unimodal Machine Learning
Ari Karchmer
Recently, multimodal machine learning has enjoyed huge empirical success (e.g. GPT-4). Motivated to develop theoretical justification for this empirical success, Lu (NeurIPS '23, ALT '24) introduces a theory of multimodal learning, and considers possible textit{separations} between theoretical models of multimodal and unimodal learning. In particular, Lu (ALT '24) shows a computational separation, which is relevant to textit{worst-case} instances of the learning task. In this paper, we give a stronger textit{average-case} computational separation, where for ``typical'' instances of the learning task, unimodal learning is computationally hard, but multimodal learning is easy. We then question how ``natural'' the average-case separation is. Would it be encountered in practice? To this end, we prove that under basic conditions, any given computational separation between average-case unimodal and multimodal learning tasks implies a corresponding cryptographic key agreement protocol. We suggest to interpret this as evidence that very strong textit{computational} advantages of multimodal learning may arise textit{infrequently} in practice, since they exist only for the ``pathological'' case of inherently cryptographic distributions. However, this does not apply to possible (super-polynomial) textit{statistical} advantages.
Read more7/18/2024
👁️
0
Self-Supervised Multimodal Learning: A Survey
Yongshuo Zong, Oisin Mac Aodha, Timothy Hospedales
Multimodal learning, which aims to understand and analyze information from multiple modalities, has achieved substantial progress in the supervised regime in recent years. However, the heavy dependence on data paired with expensive human annotations impedes scaling up models. Meanwhile, given the availability of large-scale unannotated data in the wild, self-supervised learning has become an attractive strategy to alleviate the annotation bottleneck. Building on these two directions, self-supervised multimodal learning (SSML) provides ways to learn from raw multimodal data. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive review of the state-of-the-art in SSML, in which we elucidate three major challenges intrinsic to self-supervised learning with multimodal data: (1) learning representations from multimodal data without labels, (2) fusion of different modalities, and (3) learning with unaligned data. We then detail existing solutions to these challenges. Specifically, we consider (1) objectives for learning from multimodal unlabeled data via self-supervision, (2) model architectures from the perspective of different multimodal fusion strategies, and (3) pair-free learning strategies for coarse-grained and fine-grained alignment. We also review real-world applications of SSML algorithms in diverse fields such as healthcare, remote sensing, and machine translation. Finally, we discuss challenges and future directions for SSML. A collection of related resources can be found at: https://github.com/ys-zong/awesome-self-supervised-multimodal-learning.
Read more8/19/2024
🌿
0
Mutual Information Analysis in Multimodal Learning Systems
Hadi Hadizadeh, S. Faegheh Yeganli, Bahador Rashidi, Ivan V. Baji'c
In recent years, there has been a significant increase in applications of multimodal signal processing and analysis, largely driven by the increased availability of multimodal datasets and the rapid progress in multimodal learning systems. Well-known examples include autonomous vehicles, audiovisual generative systems, vision-language systems, and so on. Such systems integrate multiple signal modalities: text, speech, images, video, LiDAR, etc., to perform various tasks. A key issue for understanding such systems is the relationship between various modalities and how it impacts task performance. In this paper, we employ the concept of mutual information (MI) to gain insight into this issue. Taking advantage of the recent progress in entropy modeling and estimation, we develop a system called InfoMeter to estimate MI between modalities in a multimodal learning system. We then apply InfoMeter to analyze a multimodal 3D object detection system over a large-scale dataset for autonomous driving. Our experiments on this system suggest that a lower MI between modalities is beneficial for detection accuracy. This new insight may facilitate improvements in the development of future multimodal learning systems.
Read more5/22/2024