Beyond Unimodal Learning: The Importance of Integrating Multiple Modalities for Lifelong Learning

Read original: arXiv:2405.02766 - Published 5/7/2024 by Fahad Sarfraz, Bahram Zonooz, Elahe Arani

🔄

Overview

Humans excel at continual learning (CL), but deep neural networks (DNNs) suffer from catastrophic forgetting
Leveraging multiple modalities (e.g., vision, language) can help mitigate forgetting in DNNs
The paper introduces a benchmark for multimodal continual learning and explores the role of multiple modalities in enabling CL

Plain English Explanation

Humans are very good at continual learning (CL), which means they can learn new information over time without forgetting what they already know. In contrast, deep neural networks (DNNs), which are a type of AI system, often struggle with catastrophic forgetting - they tend to forget previously learned information when faced with new data.

One key feature that allows the human brain to learn effectively over time is its ability to use multiple modalities - different ways of perceiving and processing information, such as vision, language, and touch. This multimodal approach is underexplored in DNNs, so the researchers in this paper set out to study how leveraging multiple modalities can help mitigate forgetting in AI systems.

The researchers developed a benchmark for evaluating multimodal continual learning, and their findings demonstrate that using multiple modalities can indeed enable more accurate and robust representation learning. This makes the AI model less vulnerable to specific patterns in the data and helps reduce forgetting.

Additionally, the researchers found that different modalities exhibit varying degrees of robustness to distribution shift, meaning some are better than others at adapting to changes in the data over time. Finally, the researchers propose a method for effectively integrating and aligning the information from different modalities, which sets a strong baseline for both single-modal and multimodal inference.

Overall, this research provides a promising case for further exploring the role of multiple modalities in enabling continual learning in AI systems, and it offers a valuable benchmark for future studies in this area.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a benchmark for multimodal continual learning and explores the role of multiple modalities in mitigating catastrophic forgetting in deep neural networks (DNNs). The researchers hypothesize that leveraging multiple views and complementary information from different modalities (e.g., vision, language) can enable more accurate and robust representation learning, making the model less vulnerable to modality-specific regularities and reducing forgetting.

To test this, the researchers design a set of experiments using a multimodal dataset and various DNN architectures. They evaluate the models' performance on continual learning tasks, comparing single-modal and multimodal approaches. The results demonstrate that the multimodal models significantly outperform their single-modal counterparts in terms of mitigating forgetting and maintaining high performance across tasks.

Furthermore, the researchers observe that individual modalities exhibit varying degrees of robustness to distribution shift, meaning some modalities are better than others at adapting to changes in the data over time. This suggests that strategic integration and alignment of information from different modalities can be beneficial for continual learning.

To this end, the researchers propose a method for effectively integrating and aligning the information from different modalities by utilizing the relational structural similarities between the data points in each modality. This method sets a strong baseline for both single-modal and multimodal inference, demonstrating the potential of multimodal approaches for enabling continual learning in AI systems.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling case for the role of multiple modalities in mitigating forgetting in deep neural networks. However, the researchers acknowledge several caveats and areas for further research:

The proposed benchmark and experimental setup are limited to a specific set of modalities and tasks. It would be valuable to explore the generalizability of the findings to a wider range of modalities and continual learning scenarios.
The researchers' method for integrating and aligning information from different modalities, while effective, may not be the only or the optimal approach. Further research is needed to explore alternative techniques and their comparative performance.
The paper does not delve deep into the underlying mechanisms and theoretical foundations of how and why multiple modalities can enable more robust continual learning. Additional research is needed to shed light on the cognitive and neurological principles at play.
The practical deployment and real-world applicability of the multimodal continual learning approach are not fully addressed. Future work should explore the scalability, computational costs, and deployment challenges of these techniques in real-world AI systems.

Despite these limitations, the paper makes a strong contribution to the field of continual learning and highlights the potential of multimodal approaches for overcoming the challenges of catastrophic forgetting in deep neural networks.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a benchmark for multimodal continual learning and demonstrates that leveraging multiple modalities can significantly mitigate forgetting in deep neural networks. By exploiting the complementary information and varying degrees of robustness across different modalities, the researchers show that multimodal models can learn more accurate and stable representations, making them less vulnerable to modality-specific regularities.

The proposed method for integrating and aligning information from multiple modalities sets a strong baseline for both single-modal and multimodal inference, paving the way for further advancements in continual learning. This research provides a promising avenue for future exploration and has the potential to contribute to the development of more robust and adaptable AI systems that can learn and evolve over time, much like the human brain.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🔄

Beyond Unimodal Learning: The Importance of Integrating Multiple Modalities for Lifelong Learning

Fahad Sarfraz, Bahram Zonooz, Elahe Arani

While humans excel at continual learning (CL), deep neural networks (DNNs) exhibit catastrophic forgetting. A salient feature of the brain that allows effective CL is that it utilizes multiple modalities for learning and inference, which is underexplored in DNNs. Therefore, we study the role and interactions of multiple modalities in mitigating forgetting and introduce a benchmark for multimodal continual learning. Our findings demonstrate that leveraging multiple views and complementary information from multiple modalities enables the model to learn more accurate and robust representations. This makes the model less vulnerable to modality-specific regularities and considerably mitigates forgetting. Furthermore, we observe that individual modalities exhibit varying degrees of robustness to distribution shift. Finally, we propose a method for integrating and aligning the information from different modalities by utilizing the relational structural similarities between the data points in each modality. Our method sets a strong baseline that enables both single- and multimodal inference. Our study provides a promising case for further exploring the role of multiple modalities in enabling CL and provides a standard benchmark for future research.

5/7/2024

What to align in multimodal contrastive learning?

Benoit Dufumier, Javiera Castillo-Navarro, Devis Tuia, Jean-Philippe Thiran

Humans perceive the world through multisensory integration, blending the information of different modalities to adapt their behavior. Contrastive learning offers an appealing solution for multimodal self-supervised learning. Indeed, by considering each modality as a different view of the same entity, it learns to align features of different modalities in a shared representation space. However, this approach is intrinsically limited as it only learns shared or redundant information between modalities, while multimodal interactions can arise in other ways. In this work, we introduce CoMM, a Contrastive MultiModal learning strategy that enables the communication between modalities in a single multimodal space. Instead of imposing cross- or intra- modality constraints, we propose to align multimodal representations by maximizing the mutual information between augmented versions of these multimodal features. Our theoretical analysis shows that shared, synergistic and unique terms of information naturally emerge from this formulation, allowing us to estimate multimodal interactions beyond redundancy. We test CoMM both in a controlled and in a series of real-world settings: in the former, we demonstrate that CoMM effectively captures redundant, unique and synergistic information between modalities. In the latter, CoMM learns complex multimodal interactions and achieves state-of-the-art results on the six multimodal benchmarks.

9/12/2024

Revealing Vision-Language Integration in the Brain with Multimodal Networks

Vighnesh Subramaniam, Colin Conwell, Christopher Wang, Gabriel Kreiman, Boris Katz, Ignacio Cases, Andrei Barbu

We use (multi)modal deep neural networks (DNNs) to probe for sites of multimodal integration in the human brain by predicting stereoencephalography (SEEG) recordings taken while human subjects watched movies. We operationalize sites of multimodal integration as regions where a multimodal vision-language model predicts recordings better than unimodal language, unimodal vision, or linearly-integrated language-vision models. Our target DNN models span different architectures (e.g., convolutional networks and transformers) and multimodal training techniques (e.g., cross-attention and contrastive learning). As a key enabling step, we first demonstrate that trained vision and language models systematically outperform their randomly initialized counterparts in their ability to predict SEEG signals. We then compare unimodal and multimodal models against one another. Because our target DNN models often have different architectures, number of parameters, and training sets (possibly obscuring those differences attributable to integration), we carry out a controlled comparison of two models (SLIP and SimCLR), which keep all of these attributes the same aside from input modality. Using this approach, we identify a sizable number of neural sites (on average 141 out of 1090 total sites or 12.94%) and brain regions where multimodal integration seems to occur. Additionally, we find that among the variants of multimodal training techniques we assess, CLIP-style training is the best suited for downstream prediction of the neural activity in these sites.

6/21/2024

📊

Multimodality Helps Unimodality: Cross-Modal Few-Shot Learning with Multimodal Models

Zhiqiu Lin, Samuel Yu, Zhiyi Kuang, Deepak Pathak, Deva Ramanan

The ability to quickly learn a new task with minimal instruction - known as few-shot learning - is a central aspect of intelligent agents. Classical few-shot benchmarks make use of few-shot samples from a single modality, but such samples may not be sufficient to characterize an entire concept class. In contrast, humans use cross-modal information to learn new concepts efficiently. In this work, we demonstrate that one can indeed build a better ${bf visual}$ dog classifier by ${bf read}$ing about dogs and ${bf listen}$ing to them bark. To do so, we exploit the fact that recent multimodal foundation models such as CLIP learn cross-modal encoders that map different modalities to the same representation space. Specifically, we propose a simple strategy for ${bf cross-modal}$ ${bf adaptation}$: we treat examples from different modalities as additional few-shot examples. For example, by simply repurposing class names as an additional training sample, we trivially turn any n-shot learning problem into a (n+1)-shot problem. This allows us to produce SOTA results with embarrassingly simple linear classifiers. We show that our approach can be combined with existing methods such as prefix tuning, adapters, and classifier ensembling. Finally, to explore other modalities beyond vision and language, we construct the first (to our knowledge) audiovisual few-shot benchmark and use cross-modal training to improve the performance of both image and audio classification.

8/29/2024