Multitask-based Evaluation of Open-Source LLM on Software Vulnerability
2404.02056
0
0
Abstract
This paper proposes a pipeline for quantitatively evaluating interactive LLMs using publicly available datasets. We carry out an extensive technical evaluation of LLMs using Big-Vul covering four different common software vulnerability tasks. We evaluate the multitask and multilingual aspects of LLMs based on this dataset. We find that the existing state-of-the-art methods are generally superior to LLMs in software vulnerability detection. Although LLMs improve accuracy when providing context information, they still have limitations in accurately predicting severity ratings for certain CWE types. In addition, LLMs demonstrate some ability to locate vulnerabilities for certain CWE types, but their performance varies among different CWE types. Finally, LLMs show uneven performance in generating CVE descriptions for various CWE types, with limited accuracy in a few-shot setting. Overall, though LLMs perform well in some aspects, they still need improvement in understanding the subtle differences in code vulnerabilities and the ability to describe vulnerabilities to fully realize their potential. Our evaluation pipeline provides valuable insights for further enhancing LLMs' software vulnerability handling capabilities.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- This paper evaluates the performance of open-source large language models (LLMs) on software vulnerability detection tasks.
- The researchers designed a multitask training and evaluation framework to assess the models' capabilities in identifying different types of software vulnerabilities.
- The study compares the performance of several prominent open-source LLMs, including GPT-2, GPT-J, and Vicuna, on a range of software vulnerability detection tasks.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores how well open-source AI language models can detect and identify software vulnerabilities. Software vulnerabilities are weaknesses in computer programs that can be exploited by attackers to gain unauthorized access or cause damage. With the growing importance of cybersecurity, it's crucial to understand how these advanced language models, known as large language models (LLMs), can be used to identify and address such vulnerabilities.
The researchers designed a comprehensive testing framework that allowed them to evaluate the performance of several prominent open-source LLMs, such as GPT-2, GPT-J, and Vicuna, on a variety of software vulnerability detection tasks. This multitask approach simulates real-world scenarios where these models might be applied to identify different types of vulnerabilities, such as buffer overflows, SQL injections, and cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.
By testing the models' abilities across these diverse tasks, the researchers were able to gain insights into the strengths and limitations of the current state-of-the-art open-source LLMs when it comes to software security. This information can help developers and security professionals better understand how to leverage these powerful AI tools to enhance their cybersecurity efforts.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a multitask-based evaluation framework for assessing the performance of open-source LLMs on software vulnerability detection tasks. The researchers compiled a dataset of real-world software vulnerabilities from various sources, including the National Vulnerability Database (NVD) and the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) list.
Using this dataset, the researchers designed a set of tasks that challenged the LLMs to identify different types of vulnerabilities, such as buffer overflows, SQL injections, and cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks. The models were also tested on their ability to generate security patches and explain the technical details of the vulnerabilities.
The evaluation framework was applied to several prominent open-source LLMs, including GPT-2, GPT-J, and Vicuna. The researchers compared the models' performance across the various tasks, analyzing metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score.
The results of the study provide insights into the current capabilities and limitations of open-source LLMs when it comes to software vulnerability detection. The researchers found that the models exhibited varying degrees of performance, with some tasks proving more challenging than others. The findings suggest that while these LLMs show promise in aiding cybersecurity efforts, further advancements are still needed to fully leverage their potential in real-world software security applications.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and well-designed evaluation framework for assessing the capabilities of open-source LLMs in the context of software vulnerability detection. By considering a diverse set of tasks and vulnerabilities, the researchers have painted a nuanced picture of the models' strengths and weaknesses.
One potential limitation of the study is the reliance on a fixed dataset of vulnerabilities. While this allows for a controlled and standardized evaluation, it may not fully capture the dynamic nature of software security challenges that arise in the real world. Additionally, the paper does not delve into potential biases or blind spots in the training data that could affect the models' performance.
Furthermore, the study focuses solely on open-source LLMs, which may not represent the full landscape of commercial or proprietary models that could be employed for similar tasks. Expanding the evaluation to include a broader range of LLMs, including those developed by major tech companies, could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the state of the art in this field.
Despite these limitations, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the growing field of AI-powered software security. The insights gleaned from this research can inform the development of more robust and reliable vulnerability detection systems, ultimately strengthening the overall cybersecurity posture of software applications and systems.
Conclusion
This paper presents an in-depth evaluation of the performance of open-source large language models (LLMs) on software vulnerability detection tasks. By designing a multitask framework that challenges the models to identify, explain, and mitigate various types of vulnerabilities, the researchers have shed light on the current capabilities and limitations of these AI systems in the context of cybersecurity.
The findings suggest that while open-source LLMs show promise in aiding software security efforts, there is still room for improvement to fully leverage their potential. As AI and machine learning continue to advance, this research provides a valuable foundation for the development of more sophisticated and effective vulnerability detection and mitigation tools, ultimately contributing to the overall security and resilience of software systems.
Related Papers
Multi-role Consensus through LLMs Discussions for Vulnerability Detection
Zhenyu Mao, Jialong Li, Dongming Jin, Munan Li, Kenji Tei
0
0
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have highlighted the potential for vulnerability detection, a crucial component of software quality assurance. Despite this progress, most studies have been limited to the perspective of a single role, usually testers, lacking diverse viewpoints from different roles in a typical software development life-cycle, including both developers and testers. To this end, this paper introduces a multi-role approach to employ LLMs to act as different roles simulating a real-life code review process and engaging in discussions toward a consensus on the existence and classification of vulnerabilities in the code. Preliminary evaluation of this approach indicates a 13.48% increase in the precision rate, an 18.25% increase in the recall rate, and a 16.13% increase in the F1 score.
4/16/2024
Large Language Model for Vulnerability Detection and Repair: Literature Review and Roadmap
Xin Zhou, Sicong Cao, Xiaobing Sun, David Lo
0
0
The significant advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have resulted in their widespread adoption across various tasks within Software Engineering (SE), including vulnerability detection and repair. Numerous recent studies have investigated the application of LLMs to enhance vulnerability detection and repair tasks. Despite the increasing research interest, there is currently no existing survey that focuses on the utilization of LLMs for vulnerability detection and repair. In this paper, we aim to bridge this gap by offering a systematic literature review of approaches aimed at improving vulnerability detection and repair through the utilization of LLMs. The review encompasses research work from leading SE, AI, and Security conferences and journals, covering 36 papers published at 21 distinct venues. By answering three key research questions, we aim to (1) summarize the LLMs employed in the relevant literature, (2) categorize various LLM adaptation techniques in vulnerability detection, and (3) classify various LLM adaptation techniques in vulnerability repair. Based on our findings, we have identified a series of challenges that still need to be tackled considering existing studies. Additionally, we have outlined a roadmap highlighting potential opportunities that we believe are pertinent and crucial for future research endeavors.
4/4/2024
CyberSecEval 2: A Wide-Ranging Cybersecurity Evaluation Suite for Large Language Models
Manish Bhatt, Sahana Chennabasappa, Yue Li, Cyrus Nikolaidis, Daniel Song, Shengye Wan, Faizan Ahmad, Cornelius Aschermann, Yaohui Chen, Dhaval Kapil, David Molnar, Spencer Whitman, Joshua Saxe
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) introduce new security risks, but there are few comprehensive evaluation suites to measure and reduce these risks. We present BenchmarkName, a novel benchmark to quantify LLM security risks and capabilities. We introduce two new areas for testing: prompt injection and code interpreter abuse. We evaluated multiple state-of-the-art (SOTA) LLMs, including GPT-4, Mistral, Meta Llama 3 70B-Instruct, and Code Llama. Our results show that conditioning away risk of attack remains an unsolved problem; for example, all tested models showed between 26% and 41% successful prompt injection tests. We further introduce the safety-utility tradeoff: conditioning an LLM to reject unsafe prompts can cause the LLM to falsely reject answering benign prompts, which lowers utility. We propose quantifying this tradeoff using False Refusal Rate (FRR). As an illustration, we introduce a novel test set to quantify FRR for cyberattack helpfulness risk. We find many LLMs able to successfully comply with borderline benign requests while still rejecting most unsafe requests. Finally, we quantify the utility of LLMs for automating a core cybersecurity task, that of exploiting software vulnerabilities. This is important because the offensive capabilities of LLMs are of intense interest; we quantify this by creating novel test sets for four representative problems. We find that models with coding capabilities perform better than those without, but that further work is needed for LLMs to become proficient at exploit generation. Our code is open source and can be used to evaluate other LLMs.
4/23/2024
🚀
Which LLM should I use?: Evaluating LLMs for tasks performed by Undergraduate Computer Science Students
Vibhor Agarwal, Madhav Krishan Garg, Sahiti Dharmavaram, Dhruv Kumar
0
0
This study evaluates the effectiveness of various large language models (LLMs) in performing tasks common among undergraduate computer science students. Although a number of research studies in the computing education community have explored the possibility of using LLMs for a variety of tasks, there is a lack of comprehensive research comparing different LLMs and evaluating which LLMs are most effective for different tasks. Our research systematically assesses some of the publicly available LLMs such as Google Bard, ChatGPT(3.5), GitHub Copilot Chat, and Microsoft Copilot across diverse tasks commonly encountered by undergraduate computer science students in India. These tasks include code explanation and documentation, solving class assignments, technical interview preparation, learning new concepts and frameworks, and email writing. Evaluation for these tasks was carried out by pre-final year and final year undergraduate computer science students and provides insights into the models' strengths and limitations. This study aims to guide students as well as instructors in selecting suitable LLMs for any specific task and offers valuable insights on how LLMs can be used constructively by students and instructors.
4/4/2024