Large Language Model for Vulnerability Detection and Repair: Literature Review and Roadmap
2404.02525
0
0
Abstract
The significant advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have resulted in their widespread adoption across various tasks within Software Engineering (SE), including vulnerability detection and repair. Numerous recent studies have investigated the application of LLMs to enhance vulnerability detection and repair tasks. Despite the increasing research interest, there is currently no existing survey that focuses on the utilization of LLMs for vulnerability detection and repair. In this paper, we aim to bridge this gap by offering a systematic literature review of approaches aimed at improving vulnerability detection and repair through the utilization of LLMs. The review encompasses research work from leading SE, AI, and Security conferences and journals, covering 36 papers published at 21 distinct venues. By answering three key research questions, we aim to (1) summarize the LLMs employed in the relevant literature, (2) categorize various LLM adaptation techniques in vulnerability detection, and (3) classify various LLM adaptation techniques in vulnerability repair. Based on our findings, we have identified a series of challenges that still need to be tackled considering existing studies. Additionally, we have outlined a roadmap highlighting potential opportunities that we believe are pertinent and crucial for future research endeavors.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- The paper reviews the research on using large language models (LLMs) for detecting and repairing software vulnerabilities.
- It outlines the key challenges and potential solutions in this area, providing a roadmap for future research.
- The paper highlights the promise of LLMs in automating vulnerability detection and repair, which could significantly improve software security.
Plain English Explanation
Software vulnerabilities are weaknesses in computer programs that can be exploited by attackers to gain unauthorized access, disrupt operations, or steal data. Detecting and fixing these vulnerabilities is an essential but time-consuming and error-prone task. The researchers believe that large language models (LLMs) - powerful AI systems trained on vast amounts of text data - could revolutionize this process.
LLMs have shown remarkable capabilities in understanding and generating human-like text. The researchers propose that these models could be adapted to analyze software code, identify potential vulnerabilities, and even suggest fixes. This could automate a significant portion of the vulnerability management process, freeing up human experts to focus on more complex issues.
The researchers outline several key challenges that need to be addressed, such as teaching LLMs to accurately understand the semantics of programming languages, and ensuring the reliability and security of the vulnerability detection and repair process. They also discuss the need to address potential biases and limitations of LLMs to make sure the technology is trustworthy and fair.
Overall, the researchers are optimistic about the potential of LLMs to transform software security, but acknowledge that significant research and development is still needed to realize this vision.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by introducing the problem of software vulnerabilities and the current manual, time-consuming process of detecting and repairing them. The authors argue that large language models (LLMs) could offer a transformative solution to this challenge.
The paper outlines the key components of the vulnerability detection and repair problem, including:
- Vulnerability Detection: Automatically identifying weaknesses in software code that could be exploited by attackers.
- Vulnerability Repair: Generating fixes or patches to address the identified vulnerabilities.
The authors discuss how LLMs, with their ability to understand natural language and extract semantic information, could be adapted to tackle these tasks. They propose several technical approaches, such as:
- Code Understanding: Using LLMs to deeply analyze software code and identify potential vulnerabilities based on patterns and anomalies.
- Vulnerability Description Generation: Generating human-readable descriptions of identified vulnerabilities to aid in the repair process.
- Patch Generation: Leveraging LLMs to propose fixes or patches to address the vulnerabilities.
The paper also highlights the key challenges that must be overcome, including:
- Domain-Specific Knowledge: Ensuring LLMs can accurately understand the semantics and conventions of programming languages.
- Reliability and Security: Ensuring the vulnerability detection and repair process is robust and secure, without introducing new vulnerabilities.
- Bias and Fairness: Addressing potential biases in LLMs to ensure the technology is equitable and does not perpetuate unfair outcomes.
The authors conclude by outlining a research roadmap to further explore the potential of LLMs for vulnerability detection and repair, and discuss the broader implications for improving software security.
Critical Analysis
The researchers make a compelling case for the potential of large language models (LLMs) to revolutionize the process of software vulnerability detection and repair. Their proposal is well-grounded in the current challenges faced in this domain and the demonstrated capabilities of LLMs in related tasks.
However, the authors also acknowledge several significant hurdles that must be overcome. Accurately understanding the semantics of programming languages and ensuring the reliability and security of the vulnerability detection and repair process will be particularly challenging. The potential for biases and fairness issues in LLMs is also a valid concern that requires careful consideration.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the specifics of how LLMs would be trained and integrated into the vulnerability management workflow. The feasibility and practicality of these approaches in real-world software development environments remains to be seen.
Further research and experimentation will be necessary to validate the proposed solutions and address the identified challenges. Collaboration between AI researchers, software engineers, and security experts will likely be crucial to advancing this field and ensuring the responsible development of LLM-based vulnerability management systems.
Conclusion
The researchers have laid out a promising roadmap for leveraging large language models (LLMs) to automate the detection and repair of software vulnerabilities. If successfully implemented, this approach could significantly improve the efficiency and effectiveness of software security processes, ultimately leading to more secure and resilient software systems.
However, the technical and ethical challenges highlighted in the paper must be carefully addressed to ensure the reliable and trustworthy deployment of LLM-based vulnerability management solutions. Continued research and multi-disciplinary collaboration will be essential to realizing the full potential of this technology and its positive impact on the field of software security.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Large Language Models for Cyber Security: A Systematic Literature Review
HanXiang Xu, ShenAo Wang, NingKe Li, KaiLong Wang, YanJie Zhao, Kai Chen, Ting Yu, Yang Liu, HaoYu Wang
0
0
The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has opened up new opportunities for leveraging artificial intelligence in various domains, including cybersecurity. As the volume and sophistication of cyber threats continue to grow, there is an increasing need for intelligent systems that can automatically detect vulnerabilities, analyze malware, and respond to attacks. In this survey, we conduct a comprehensive review of the literature on the application of LLMs in cybersecurity (LLM4Security). By comprehensively collecting over 30K relevant papers and systematically analyzing 127 papers from top security and software engineering venues, we aim to provide a holistic view of how LLMs are being used to solve diverse problems across the cybersecurity domain. Through our analysis, we identify several key findings. First, we observe that LLMs are being applied to a wide range of cybersecurity tasks, including vulnerability detection, malware analysis, network intrusion detection, and phishing detection. Second, we find that the datasets used for training and evaluating LLMs in these tasks are often limited in size and diversity, highlighting the need for more comprehensive and representative datasets. Third, we identify several promising techniques for adapting LLMs to specific cybersecurity domains, such as fine-tuning, transfer learning, and domain-specific pre-training. Finally, we discuss the main challenges and opportunities for future research in LLM4Security, including the need for more interpretable and explainable models, the importance of addressing data privacy and security concerns, and the potential for leveraging LLMs for proactive defense and threat hunting. Overall, our survey provides a comprehensive overview of the current state-of-the-art in LLM4Security and identifies several promising directions for future research.
5/10/2024
Multi-role Consensus through LLMs Discussions for Vulnerability Detection
Zhenyu Mao, Jialong Li, Dongming Jin, Munan Li, Kenji Tei
0
0
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have highlighted the potential for vulnerability detection, a crucial component of software quality assurance. Despite this progress, most studies have been limited to the perspective of a single role, usually testers, lacking diverse viewpoints from different roles in a typical software development life-cycle, including both developers and testers. To this end, this paper introduces a multi-role approach to employ LLMs to act as different roles simulating a real-life code review process and engaging in discussions toward a consensus on the existence and classification of vulnerabilities in the code. Preliminary evaluation of this approach indicates a 13.48% increase in the precision rate, an 18.25% increase in the recall rate, and a 16.13% increase in the F1 score.
4/16/2024
Multitask-based Evaluation of Open-Source LLM on Software Vulnerability
Xin Yin, Chao Ni
0
0
This paper proposes a pipeline for quantitatively evaluating interactive LLMs using publicly available datasets. We carry out an extensive technical evaluation of LLMs using Big-Vul covering four different common software vulnerability tasks. We evaluate the multitask and multilingual aspects of LLMs based on this dataset. We find that the existing state-of-the-art methods are generally superior to LLMs in software vulnerability detection. Although LLMs improve accuracy when providing context information, they still have limitations in accurately predicting severity ratings for certain CWE types. In addition, LLMs demonstrate some ability to locate vulnerabilities for certain CWE types, but their performance varies among different CWE types. Finally, LLMs show uneven performance in generating CVE descriptions for various CWE types, with limited accuracy in a few-shot setting. Overall, though LLMs perform well in some aspects, they still need improvement in understanding the subtle differences in code vulnerabilities and the ability to describe vulnerabilities to fully realize their potential. Our evaluation pipeline provides valuable insights for further enhancing LLMs' software vulnerability handling capabilities.
4/3/2024
💬
Exploring the landscape of large language models: Foundations, techniques, and challenges
Milad Moradi, Ke Yan, David Colwell, Matthias Samwald, Rhona Asgari
0
0
In this review paper, we delve into the realm of Large Language Models (LLMs), covering their foundational principles, diverse applications, and nuanced training processes. The article sheds light on the mechanics of in-context learning and a spectrum of fine-tuning approaches, with a special focus on methods that optimize efficiency in parameter usage. Additionally, it explores how LLMs can be more closely aligned with human preferences through innovative reinforcement learning frameworks and other novel methods that incorporate human feedback. The article also examines the emerging technique of retrieval augmented generation, integrating external knowledge into LLMs. The ethical dimensions of LLM deployment are discussed, underscoring the need for mindful and responsible application. Concluding with a perspective on future research trajectories, this review offers a succinct yet comprehensive overview of the current state and emerging trends in the evolving landscape of LLMs, serving as an insightful guide for both researchers and practitioners in artificial intelligence.
4/19/2024