NaturalCodeBench: Examining Coding Performance Mismatch on HumanEval and Natural User Prompts

Overview

• Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong capabilities in generating code for various tasks.
• However, current benchmarks for code synthesis, such as HumanEval, MBPP, and DS-1000, are primarily focused on introductory algorithm and data science problems, which may not adequately represent the complexity and variety of real-world coding scenarios.
• To address this gap, the researchers propose a new benchmark called NaturalCodeBench (NCB) that aims to reflect the challenges and diversity of real-world coding tasks.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are advanced artificial intelligence systems that can generate human-like text, including code. While current benchmarks for testing LLMs' code generation abilities, such as HumanEval, MBPP, and DS-1000, are useful for evaluating basic coding skills, they don't capture the full complexity and diversity of real-world coding tasks that developers face.

To address this, the researchers created a new benchmark called NaturalCodeBench (NCB) that includes 402 high-quality coding problems in Python and Java, selected from actual user queries on online coding services. These problems cover a wide range of domains, from data analysis to web development, and are designed to be more representative of the challenges that professional developers encounter in their daily work.

Additionally, the researchers developed a semi-automated pipeline to help efficiently create test cases for these real-world coding problems, which can be a time-consuming and challenging task. This pipeline allows them to generate test cases more quickly and reliably than manual methods.

By evaluating a variety of LLMs on this new NCB benchmark, the researchers found that even the best-performing models, like GPT-4, still struggle to solve many of the problems, indicating that there is still significant room for improvement in developing LLMs that can truly excel at practical, real-world coding tasks.

Technical Explanation

The researchers propose a new benchmark called NaturalCodeBench (NCB) to better evaluate the code synthesis capabilities of large language models (LLMs). Unlike existing benchmarks like HumanEval, MBPP, and DS-1000, which focus on introductory algorithm and data science problems, NCB comprises 402 high-quality coding problems in Python and Java that are drawn from real-world user queries on online coding services.

These problems cover a wide range of domains, including data analysis, web development, and problem-solving, and are designed to be more representative of the complex and diverse scenarios that professional developers encounter in their work. To enhance the efficiency of test case construction for these real-world queries, the researchers also introduce a semi-automated pipeline, which they show can achieve a more than 4-fold increase in efficiency compared to manual solutions.

The researchers evaluate 39 different LLMs on the NCB benchmark and find that even the best-performing model, GPT-4, still struggles to solve many of the problems. This suggests that current LLMs, while adept at generating code for basic tasks, are not yet fully equipped to handle the complexity and variety of real-world coding scenarios. The researchers also observe that performance gaps between models with similar scores on the HumanEval benchmark can be significant, indicating that the HumanEval benchmark may not be sufficient for capturing the full range of practical code synthesis capabilities.

The NCB evaluation toolkit and development set are made publicly available at https://github.com/THUDM/NaturalCodeBench, allowing other researchers and developers to further explore and improve the code generation abilities of LLMs.

Critical Analysis

The researchers have made a valuable contribution by developing the NaturalCodeBench (NCB), a more challenging and representative benchmark for evaluating the code synthesis capabilities of large language models (LLMs). By drawing from real-world user queries, NCB reflects the complexity and diversity of coding tasks that professional developers face, going beyond the introductory problems found in existing benchmarks like HumanEval and MBPP.

However, the researchers acknowledge the significant challenge in creating appropriate test cases for these real-world queries, which can be time-consuming and error-prone. While their semi-automated pipeline helps to improve efficiency, it is unclear how the quality and representativeness of the generated test cases compare to manually curated ones.

Additionally, the researchers' systematic experiments on 39 LLMs, including the cutting-edge GPT-4, reveal that even the best-performing models still struggle to solve many of the problems in the NCB benchmark. This suggests that current LLMs, while adept at generating code for basic tasks, are not yet ready to handle the full complexity and diversity of real-world coding scenarios.

Further research is needed to understand the specific limitations of LLMs in this domain and to develop more robust and versatile code synthesis capabilities. Potential areas for exploration include improving the quality of prompts used for code generation, enhancing the models' ability to understand and reason about code, and generating more comprehensive and scalable test cases.

Conclusion

The NaturalCodeBench (NCB) proposed by the researchers represents a significant step forward in benchmarking the code synthesis capabilities of large language models (LLMs). By incorporating real-world coding problems that cover a wide range of domains and complexity levels, NCB provides a more comprehensive and representative evaluation of LLMs' practical abilities, going beyond the limitations of existing benchmarks.

The researchers' findings suggest that even the most advanced LLMs, such as GPT-4, still have significant room for improvement when it comes to handling the full range of coding challenges that professional developers face. This underscores the need for continued research and development to enhance the code synthesis capabilities of LLMs, which could have far-reaching implications for fields like software engineering, data analysis, and scientific computing.

The open-source availability of the NCB evaluation toolkit and development set will enable other researchers and developers to further explore and push the boundaries of LLM-based code generation, ultimately contributing to the advancement of this critical technology.