Navigating Knowledge Management Implementation Success in Government Organizations: A type-2 fuzzy approach

Read original: arXiv:2406.12345 - Published 6/19/2024 by Saman Foroutani, Nasim Fahimian, Reyhaneh Jalalinejad, Morteza Hezarkhani, Samaneh Mahmoudi, Behrooz Gharleghi
Total Score

0

👀

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Effective knowledge management is crucial for organizational success
  • The study explores critical success and failure factors for implementing knowledge management systems in government organizations
  • The research employs a descriptive survey methodology, collecting data through interviews and questionnaires

Plain English Explanation

Successful knowledge management is essential for organizations to achieve their goals efficiently. Effective knowledge management provides a strategic advantage and is a key factor in organizational success, as knowledge is a valuable and limited resource. This study aims to identify the critical elements that lead to the success or failure of knowledge management system implementation in government organizations.

The researchers used a survey-based approach, conducting random interviews and collecting questionnaire data to gather information. The study highlights the key factors that contribute to successful knowledge management systems in government organizations. These include fostering cooperation and an open atmosphere, training staff, encouraging creativity and innovation, removing organizational constraints, implementing reward policies, role modeling, and maintaining a clear focus.

On the other hand, the study also reveals the factors that can hinder the successful implementation of knowledge management systems. Failing to consider formality, staff participation, collaboration technologies, network and hardware infrastructure, complexity, IT staff, and trust can all pose significant challenges. Understanding these critical success and failure factors can help government organizations develop and implement effective knowledge management strategies.

Technical Explanation

The study employed a descriptive survey methodology to identify the critical success and failure factors for implementing knowledge management systems in government organizations. The researchers collected data through random interviews and questionnaires, allowing them to gather a comprehensive understanding of the key elements that contribute to successful knowledge management system implementation.

The study highlights several critical success factors, including:

  • Cooperation: Fostering a collaborative and cooperative environment among staff
  • Open atmosphere: Maintaining an open and transparent organizational culture
  • Staff training: Providing training and development opportunities for employees
  • Creativity and innovation: Encouraging and supporting creative and innovative thinking
  • Removal of organizational constraints: Addressing and removing any bureaucratic or structural barriers
  • Reward policies: Implementing effective reward and recognition systems
  • Role modeling: Demonstrating and promoting best practices through leadership
  • Focus: Maintaining a clear and consistent focus on knowledge management objectives

Conversely, the study also identifies potential failure factors, such as:

  • Formality: Excessive bureaucracy and rigid organizational structures
  • Staff participation: Lack of employee engagement and involvement
  • Collaboration technologies: Inadequate or ineffective collaboration tools and technologies
  • Network and hardware infrastructure: Insufficient or outdated IT infrastructure
  • Complexity: Overly complex knowledge management systems
  • IT staff: Insufficient or poorly trained IT personnel
  • Trust: Lack of trust among employees and across the organization

Understanding these critical success and failure factors can help government organizations develop and implement effective knowledge management strategies that leverage the strengths and mitigate the weaknesses identified in the study.

Critical Analysis

The study provides valuable insights into the key factors that contribute to the success or failure of knowledge management system implementation in government organizations. By highlighting both the critical success factors and the potential failure factors, the researchers offer a comprehensive understanding of the complex dynamics involved in effective knowledge management.

However, the study does not delve deeply into the specific contextual and cultural factors that may influence the implementation of knowledge management systems in different government organizations. The use of an open innovation paradigm in the public sector could also be an area worth exploring further, as it may offer additional insights into the unique challenges and opportunities faced by government organizations in managing knowledge.

Additionally, the study could have benefited from a more detailed examination of the relationships and interdependencies between the various success and failure factors identified. Understanding how these elements interact and influence one another could provide a more nuanced understanding of the knowledge management implementation process.

Despite these potential areas for further research, the study presents a solid foundation for understanding the critical factors that govern the success or failure of knowledge management systems in government organizations. The findings can serve as a valuable reference for practitioners and policymakers seeking to improve knowledge management practices within the public sector.

Conclusion

This study provides a comprehensive exploration of the critical success and failure factors for implementing knowledge management systems in government organizations. By employing a descriptive survey methodology, the researchers have identified the key elements that contribute to the success or failure of such implementations.

The findings highlight the importance of fostering a cooperative and open organizational culture, investing in staff training and development, encouraging creativity and innovation, and addressing structural and bureaucratic constraints. Conversely, the study also reveals the potential pitfalls of neglecting factors such as formality, staff participation, collaboration technologies, IT infrastructure, and trust.

Understanding these critical factors can help government organizations develop and implement effective knowledge management strategies that leverage their strengths and mitigate their weaknesses. By prioritizing these elements, organizations can enhance their knowledge management capabilities and improve their overall organizational success.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

👀

Total Score

0

Navigating Knowledge Management Implementation Success in Government Organizations: A type-2 fuzzy approach

Saman Foroutani, Nasim Fahimian, Reyhaneh Jalalinejad, Morteza Hezarkhani, Samaneh Mahmoudi, Behrooz Gharleghi

Optimal information and knowledge management is crucial for organizations to achieve their objectives efficiently. As a rare and valuable resource, effective knowledge management provides a strategic advantage and has become a key determinant of organizational success. The study aims to identify critical success and failure factors for implementing knowledge management systems in government organizations. This research employs a descriptive survey methodology, collecting data through random interviews and questionnaires. The study highlights the critical success factors for knowledge management systems in government organizations, including cooperation, an open atmosphere, staff training, creativity and innovation, removal of organizational constraints, reward policies, role modeling, and focus. Conversely, failure to consider formality, staff participation, collaboration technologies, network and hardware infrastructure, complexity, IT staff, and trust can pose significant obstacles to successful implementation.

Read more

6/19/2024

A Survey on Knowledge Organization Systems of Research Fields: Resources and Challenges
Total Score

0

A Survey on Knowledge Organization Systems of Research Fields: Resources and Challenges

Angelo Salatino, Tanay Aggarwal, Andrea Mannocci, Francesco Osborne, Enrico Motta

Knowledge Organization Systems (KOSs), such as term lists, thesauri, taxonomies, and ontologies, play a fundamental role in categorising, managing, and retrieving information. In the academic domain, KOSs are often adopted for representing research areas and their relationships, primarily aiming to classify research articles, academic courses, patents, books, scientific venues, domain experts, grants, software, experiment materials, and several other relevant products and agents. These structured representations of research areas, widely embraced by many academic fields, have proven effective in empowering AI-based systems to i) enhance retrievability of relevant documents, ii) enable advanced analytic solutions to quantify the impact of academic research, and iii) analyse and forecast research dynamics. This paper aims to present a comprehensive survey of the current KOS for academic disciplines. We analysed and compared 45 KOSs according to five main dimensions: scope, structure, curation, usage, and links to other KOSs. Our results reveal a very heterogeneous scenario in terms of scope, scale, quality, and usage, highlighting the need for more integrated solutions for representing research knowledge across academic fields. We conclude by discussing the main challenges and the most promising future directions.

Read more

9/9/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Knowledge Management in the Companion Cognitive Architecture

Constantine Nakos, Kenneth D. Forbus

One of the fundamental aspects of cognitive architectures is their ability to encode and manipulate knowledge. Without a consistent, well-designed, and scalable knowledge management scheme, an architecture will be unable to move past toy problems and tackle the broader problems of cognition. In this paper, we document some of the challenges we have faced in developing the knowledge stack for the Companion cognitive architecture and discuss the tools, representations, and practices we have developed to overcome them. We also lay out a series of potential next steps that will allow Companion agents to play a greater role in managing their own knowledge. It is our hope that these observations will prove useful to other cognitive architecture developers facing similar challenges.

Read more

7/10/2024

Uncertainty Management in the Construction of Knowledge Graphs: a Survey
Total Score

0

Uncertainty Management in the Construction of Knowledge Graphs: a Survey

Lucas Jarnac, Yoan Chabot, Miguel Couceiro

Knowledge Graphs (KGs) are a major asset for companies thanks to their great flexibility in data representation and their numerous applications, e.g., vocabulary sharing, Q/A or recommendation systems. To build a KG it is a common practice to rely on automatic methods for extracting knowledge from various heterogeneous sources. But in a noisy and uncertain world, knowledge may not be reliable and conflicts between data sources may occur. Integrating unreliable data would directly impact the use of the KG, therefore such conflicts must be resolved. This could be done manually by selecting the best data to integrate. This first approach is highly accurate, but costly and time-consuming. That is why recent efforts focus on automatic approaches, which represents a challenging task since it requires handling the uncertainty of extracted knowledge throughout its integration into the KG. We survey state-of-the-art approaches in this direction and present constructions of both open and enterprise KGs and how their quality is maintained. We then describe different knowledge extraction methods, introducing additional uncertainty. We also discuss downstream tasks after knowledge acquisition, including KG completion using embedding models, knowledge alignment, and knowledge fusion in order to address the problem of knowledge uncertainty in KG construction. We conclude with a discussion on the remaining challenges and perspectives when constructing a KG taking into account uncertainty.

Read more

7/22/2024