Navigating Text-to-Image Generative Bias across Indic Languages
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores bias in text-to-image generation models across different Indic languages.
- It examines how these models perform on images related to various Indic languages and cultures.
- The researchers developed a benchmark dataset to measure biases in text-to-image generation for Indic languages.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at the issue of bias in text-to-image generation models, which are AI systems that can create images based on text descriptions. The researchers were particularly interested in how these models perform when dealing with content related to different Indic languages, such as Hindi, Bengali, and others.
To study this, the researchers created a special dataset that they used to test the models. This dataset was designed to measure biases - for example, whether the models tended to produce certain types of images more or less often for different Indic language prompts. By testing the models on this dataset, the researchers were able to get a better understanding of the biases present in text-to-image generation for Indic languages.
The results of this research are important because they shed light on potential issues with these AI systems when it comes to representing diverse cultures and languages. Understanding and addressing biases in text-to-image generation can help ensure these technologies are more inclusive and accessible to people from different linguistic and cultural backgrounds.
Technical Explanation
The paper describes the development of a benchmark dataset called IndicGenBench, which is designed to evaluate the generation capabilities and biases of text-to-image models for Indic languages. The dataset covers 12 Indic languages and includes prompts related to various cultural, geographic, and everyday concepts.
The researchers tested several state-of-the-art text-to-image models on IndicGenBench, including DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion. They assessed the models' performance in terms of both generation quality and the presence of demographic, social, and linguistic biases. The analysis revealed significant biases, with some models performing better than others on certain Indic language prompts.
The paper also introduces an evaluation metric called IndicGenBench Score, which combines multiple aspects of model performance to provide an overall measure of text-to-image generation quality and bias for Indic languages. This metric can be used to track progress in addressing biases in these models over time.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable contribution by highlighting the need to address biases in text-to-image generation models, particularly for underrepresented languages and cultures. The development of the IndicGenBench dataset is a significant step towards better understanding and mitigating these biases.
However, the paper acknowledges that the dataset and evaluation are limited to a subset of Indic languages, and there may be additional biases present for other languages or cultural contexts not covered. Further research and expansion of the benchmark would be beneficial to gain a more comprehensive understanding of these issues.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential societal impacts of biases in text-to-image generation, such as the perpetuation of stereotypes or the exclusion of certain communities. Exploring these implications in more depth could strengthen the overall analysis and motivate the importance of the research.
Conclusion
This paper makes a significant contribution to the understanding of bias in text-to-image generation models, particularly for Indic languages. By developing a specialized benchmark dataset and evaluating state-of-the-art models, the researchers have shed light on the biases present in these systems and the need for more inclusive and equitable AI technologies.
The insights from this work can inform the development of future text-to-image generation models, guiding efforts to address biases and ensure these tools are accessible and representative of diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds. Continued research in this area is crucial to advancing the field of AI and promoting fairness and inclusivity in technology.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Navigating Text-to-Image Generative Bias across Indic Languages
Surbhi Mittal, Arnav Sudan, Mayank Vatsa, Richa Singh, Tamar Glaser, Tal Hassner
This research investigates biases in text-to-image (TTI) models for the Indic languages widely spoken across India. It evaluates and compares the generative performance and cultural relevance of leading TTI models in these languages against their performance in English. Using the proposed IndicTTI benchmark, we comprehensively assess the performance of 30 Indic languages with two open-source diffusion models and two commercial generation APIs. The primary objective of this benchmark is to evaluate the support for Indic languages in these models and identify areas needing improvement. Given the linguistic diversity of 30 languages spoken by over 1.4 billion people, this benchmark aims to provide a detailed and insightful analysis of TTI models' effectiveness within the Indic linguistic landscape. The data and code for the IndicTTI benchmark can be accessed at https://iab-rubric.org/resources/other-databases/indictti.
Read more8/2/2024
✨
0
TIBET: Identifying and Evaluating Biases in Text-to-Image Generative Models
Aditya Chinchure, Pushkar Shukla, Gaurav Bhatt, Kiri Salij, Kartik Hosanagar, Leonid Sigal, Matthew Turk
Text-to-Image (TTI) generative models have shown great progress in the past few years in terms of their ability to generate complex and high-quality imagery. At the same time, these models have been shown to suffer from harmful biases, including exaggerated societal biases (e.g., gender, ethnicity), as well as incidental correlations that limit such a model's ability to generate more diverse imagery. In this paper, we propose a general approach to study and quantify a broad spectrum of biases, for any TTI model and for any prompt, using counterfactual reasoning. Unlike other works that evaluate generated images on a predefined set of bias axes, our approach automatically identifies potential biases that might be relevant to the given prompt, and measures those biases. In addition, we complement quantitative scores with post-hoc explanations in terms of semantic concepts in the images generated. We show that our method is uniquely capable of explaining complex multi-dimensional biases through semantic concepts, as well as the intersectionality between different biases for any given prompt. We perform extensive user studies to illustrate that the results of our method and analysis are consistent with human judgements.
Read more7/18/2024
⚙️
0
Navigating Cultural Chasms: Exploring and Unlocking the Cultural POV of Text-To-Image Models
Mor Ventura, Eyal Ben-David, Anna Korhonen, Roi Reichart
Text-To-Image (TTI) models, such as DALL-E and StableDiffusion, have demonstrated remarkable prompt-based image generation capabilities. Multilingual encoders may have a substantial impact on the cultural agency of these models, as language is a conduit of culture. In this study, we explore the cultural perception embedded in TTI models by characterizing culture across three hierarchical tiers: cultural dimensions, cultural domains, and cultural concepts. Based on this ontology, we derive prompt templates to unlock the cultural knowledge in TTI models, and propose a comprehensive suite of evaluation techniques, including intrinsic evaluations using the CLIP space, extrinsic evaluations with a Visual-Question-Answer (VQA) model and human assessments, to evaluate the cultural content of TTI-generated images. To bolster our research, we introduce the CulText2I dataset, derived from six diverse TTI models and spanning ten languages. Our experiments provide insights regarding Do, What, Which and How research questions about the nature of cultural encoding in TTI models, paving the way for cross-cultural applications of these models.
Read more8/14/2024
🤯
0
Survey of Bias In Text-to-Image Generation: Definition, Evaluation, and Mitigation
Yixin Wan, Arjun Subramonian, Anaelia Ovalle, Zongyu Lin, Ashima Suvarna, Christina Chance, Hritik Bansal, Rebecca Pattichis, Kai-Wei Chang
The recent advancement of large and powerful models with Text-to-Image (T2I) generation abilities -- such as OpenAI's DALLE-3 and Google's Gemini -- enables users to generate high-quality images from textual prompts. However, it has become increasingly evident that even simple prompts could cause T2I models to exhibit conspicuous social bias in generated images. Such bias might lead to both allocational and representational harms in society, further marginalizing minority groups. Noting this problem, a large body of recent works has been dedicated to investigating different dimensions of bias in T2I systems. However, an extensive review of these studies is lacking, hindering a systematic understanding of current progress and research gaps. We present the first extensive survey on bias in T2I generative models. In this survey, we review prior studies on dimensions of bias: Gender, Skintone, and Geo-Culture. Specifically, we discuss how these works define, evaluate, and mitigate different aspects of bias. We found that: (1) while gender and skintone biases are widely studied, geo-cultural bias remains under-explored; (2) most works on gender and skintone bias investigated occupational association, while other aspects are less frequently studied; (3) almost all gender bias works overlook non-binary identities in their studies; (4) evaluation datasets and metrics are scattered, with no unified framework for measuring biases; and (5) current mitigation methods fail to resolve biases comprehensively. Based on current limitations, we point out future research directions that contribute to human-centric definitions, evaluations, and mitigation of biases. We hope to highlight the importance of studying biases in T2I systems, as well as encourage future efforts to holistically understand and tackle biases, building fair and trustworthy T2I technologies for everyone.
Read more5/3/2024