Nearly Minimax Optimal Regret for Multinomial Logistic Bandit
2405.09831
0
0
š ļø
Abstract
In this paper, we study the contextual multinomial logit (MNL) bandit problem in which a learning agent sequentially selects an assortment based on contextual information, and user feedback follows an MNL choice model. There has been a significant discrepancy between lower and upper regret bounds, particularly regarding the maximum assortment size $K$. Additionally, the variation in reward structures between these bounds complicates the quest for optimality. Under uniform rewards, where all items have the same expected reward, we establish a regret lower bound of $Omega(dsqrt{smash[b]{T/K}})$ and propose a constant-time algorithm, OFU-MNL+, that achieves a matching upper bound of $tilde{O}(dsqrt{smash[b]{T/K}})$. Under non-uniform rewards, we prove a lower bound of $Omega(dsqrt{T})$ and an upper bound of $tilde{O}(dsqrt{T})$, also achievable by OFU-MNL+. Our empirical studies support these theoretical findings. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work in the contextual MNL bandit literature to prove minimax optimality -- for either uniform or non-uniform reward setting -- and to propose a computationally efficient algorithm that achieves this optimality up to logarithmic factors.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates the contextual multinomial logit (MNL) bandit problem, where a learning agent selects an assortment of items based on contextual information, and user feedback follows an MNL choice model.
- The authors focus on addressing the significant discrepancy between lower and upper regret bounds, particularly regarding the feature dimension
dand the maximum assortment sizeK. - They explore the variation in reward structures between these bounds and aim to find optimal solutions.
Plain English Explanation
In this research, the authors are studying a specific type of machine learning problem called the "contextual multinomial logit (MNL) bandit problem." This problem involves a learning agent, like a recommendation system, that needs to select a group of items (called an "assortment") to show to a user based on certain information about the user (the "contextual information"). The user then provides feedback on the selected items, and this feedback follows a specific statistical model called the MNL choice model.
The researchers found that there was a significant gap between the lower and upper bounds on the "regret" of this problem, which is a measure of how well the learning agent is performing compared to the best possible solution. This gap was particularly noticeable when considering the number of features (d) and the maximum size of the assortment (K). Additionally, the way the rewards (or payoffs) for the items are structured can also complicate the quest for the optimal solution.
Under the scenario where all items have the same expected reward (called "uniform rewards"), the authors were able to establish a lower bound on the regret of Ī©(dā(T/K)) and propose an algorithm called OFU-MNL+ that achieves a matching upper bound of \tilde{O}(dā(T/K)). In the case of "non-uniform rewards," where the items have different expected rewards, they proved a lower bound of Ī©(dāT) and an upper bound of \tilde{O}(dāT), which can also be achieved by the OFU-MNL+ algorithm.
The authors' empirical studies support these theoretical findings, and they claim that this is the first work in the MNL contextual bandit literature to prove minimax optimality (the best possible performance) for both the uniform and non-uniform reward settings, and to propose a computationally efficient algorithm that achieves this optimality up to logarithmic factors.
Technical Explanation
The authors investigate the contextual multinomial logit (MNL) bandit problem, where a learning agent sequentially selects an assortment of items based on contextual information, and the user's feedback follows an MNL choice model. This problem has a significant discrepancy between the lower and upper regret bounds, particularly regarding the feature dimension d and the maximum assortment size K.
Under the "uniform rewards" setting, where all items have the same expected reward, the authors establish a regret lower bound of Ī©(dā(T/K)) and propose a constant-time algorithm called OFU-MNL+ that achieves a matching upper bound of \tilde{O}(dā(T/K)). This means that their algorithm is provably optimal, up to logarithmic factors, for the uniform rewards case.
In the "non-uniform rewards" setting, where the items have different expected rewards, the authors prove a lower bound of Ī©(dāT) and an upper bound of \tilde{O}(dāT), which can also be achieved by the OFU-MNL+ algorithm. This again shows the optimality of their proposed approach for the non-uniform rewards case.
The authors' empirical studies support these theoretical findings, and they claim that this is the first work in the MNL contextual bandit literature to prove minimax optimality (the best possible performance) for both the uniform and non-uniform reward settings, and to propose a computationally efficient algorithm that achieves this optimality up to logarithmic factors.
Critical Analysis
The authors have addressed an important problem in the field of contextual bandits, with a focus on the MNL choice model. They have made significant progress in establishing tight lower and upper bounds on the regret, which is a crucial step towards understanding the fundamental limits of this problem.
One potential limitation of the research is the assumption of either uniform or non-uniform rewards. In real-world applications, the reward structure may be more complex and may not fit neatly into these two categories. It would be interesting to see if the authors' techniques can be extended to more general reward structures.
Additionally, the authors' proposed algorithm, OFU-MNL+, is claimed to be computationally efficient, but its practical implementation and scalability to large-scale problems are not extensively evaluated in the paper. Further empirical studies on the algorithm's performance and runtime in realistic scenarios would be valuable.
Another area for future research could be the exploration of alternative choice models beyond the MNL, as different application domains may require different user behavior models. Investigating the regret bounds and optimal algorithms for other choice models could broaden the impact of this work.
Conclusion
This paper makes significant contributions to the understanding of the contextual MNL bandit problem. The authors have established tight lower and upper bounds on the regret, proving the optimality of their proposed OFU-MNL+ algorithm for both the uniform and non-uniform reward settings.
These findings have important implications for the design of recommendation systems and other decision-making applications that involve user feedback following an MNL choice model. The authors' work lays a solid theoretical foundation and provides a computationally efficient algorithm that can be leveraged in practical deployments.
While the authors have made substantial progress, there are still opportunities for further research to address the limitations and explore more general scenarios. Nonetheless, this paper represents a significant step forward in the field of contextual bandits and opens up new avenues for improving the performance and robustness of decision-making systems in the real world.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Batched Nonparametric Contextual Bandits
Rong Jiang, Cong Ma
0
0
We study nonparametric contextual bandits under batch constraints, where the expected reward for each action is modeled as a smooth function of covariates, and the policy updates are made at the end of each batch of observations. We establish a minimax regret lower bound for this setting and propose a novel batch learning algorithm that achieves the optimal regret (up to logarithmic factors). In essence, our procedure dynamically splits the covariate space into smaller bins, carefully aligning their widths with the batch size. Our theoretical results suggest that for nonparametric contextual bandits, a nearly constant number of policy updates can attain optimal regret in the fully online setting.
6/12/2024
š
Randomized Exploration for Reinforcement Learning with Multinomial Logistic Function Approximation
Wooseong Cho, Taehyun Hwang, Joongkyu Lee, Min-hwan Oh
0
0
We study reinforcement learning with multinomial logistic (MNL) function approximation where the underlying transition probability kernel of the Markov decision processes (MDPs) is parametrized by an unknown transition core with features of state and action. For the finite horizon episodic setting with inhomogeneous state transitions, we propose provably efficient algorithms with randomized exploration having frequentist regret guarantees. For our first algorithm, $texttt{RRL-MNL}$, we adapt optimistic sampling to ensure the optimism of the estimated value function with sufficient frequency and establish that $texttt{RRL-MNL}$ is both statistically and computationally efficient, achieving a $tilde{O}(kappa^{-1} d^{frac{3}{2}} H^{frac{3}{2}} sqrt{T})$ frequentist regret bound with constant-time computational cost per episode. Here, $d$ is the dimension of the transition core, $H$ is the horizon length, $T$ is the total number of steps, and $kappa$ is a problem-dependent constant. Despite the simplicity and practicality of $texttt{RRL-MNL}$, its regret bound scales with $kappa^{-1}$, which is potentially large in the worst case. To improve the dependence on $kappa^{-1}$, we propose $texttt{ORRL-MNL}$, which estimates the value function using local gradient information of the MNL transition model. We show that its frequentist regret bound is $tilde{O}(d^{frac{3}{2}} H^{frac{3}{2}} sqrt{T} + kappa^{-1} d^2 H^2)$. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first randomized RL algorithms for the MNL transition model that achieve both computational and statistical efficiency. Numerical experiments demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed algorithms.
5/31/2024
āļø
Linear bandits with polylogarithmic minimax regret
Josep Lumbreras, Marco Tomamichel
0
0
We study a noise model for linear stochastic bandits for which the subgaussian noise parameter vanishes linearly as we select actions on the unit sphere closer and closer to the unknown vector. We introduce an algorithm for this problem that exhibits a minimax regret scaling as $log^3(T)$ in the time horizon $T$, in stark contrast the square root scaling of this regret for typical bandit algorithms. Our strategy, based on weighted least-squares estimation, achieves the eigenvalue relation $lambda_{min} ( V_t ) = Omega (sqrt{lambda_{max}(V_t ) })$ for the design matrix $V_t$ at each time step $t$ through geometrical arguments that are independent of the noise model and might be of independent interest. This allows us to tightly control the expected regret in each time step to be of the order $O(frac1{t})$, leading to the logarithmic scaling of the cumulative regret.
5/30/2024
š
Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Multinomial Logit Function Approximation
Long-Fei Li, Yu-Jie Zhang, Peng Zhao, Zhi-Hua Zhou
0
0
We study a new class of MDPs that employs multinomial logit (MNL) function approximation to ensure valid probability distributions over the state space. Despite its benefits, introducing non-linear function approximation raises significant challenges in both computational and statistical efficiency. The best-known method of Hwang and Oh [2023] has achieved an $widetilde{mathcal{O}}(kappa^{-1}dH^2sqrt{K})$ regret, where $kappa$ is a problem-dependent quantity, $d$ is the feature space dimension, $H$ is the episode length, and $K$ is the number of episodes. While this result attains the same rate in $K$ as the linear cases, the method requires storing all historical data and suffers from an $mathcal{O}(K)$ computation cost per episode. Moreover, the quantity $kappa$ can be exponentially small, leading to a significant gap for the regret compared to the linear cases. In this work, we first address the computational concerns by proposing an online algorithm that achieves the same regret with only $mathcal{O}(1)$ computation cost. Then, we design two algorithms that leverage local information to enhance statistical efficiency. They not only maintain an $mathcal{O}(1)$ computation cost per episode but achieve improved regrets of $widetilde{mathcal{O}}(kappa^{-1/2}dH^2sqrt{K})$ and $widetilde{mathcal{O}}(dH^2sqrt{K} + kappa^{-1}d^2H^2)$ respectively. Finally, we establish a lower bound, justifying the optimality of our results in $d$ and $K$. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that achieves almost the same computational and statistical efficiency as linear function approximation while employing non-linear function approximation for reinforcement learning.
5/28/2024