Randomized Exploration for Reinforcement Learning with Multinomial Logistic Function Approximation

Overview

• This paper studies reinforcement learning (RL) with a multinomial logistic (MNL) function approximation, where the underlying transition probability of the Markov decision process (MDP) is parameterized by an unknown transition core with state and action features.
• The authors propose two provably efficient algorithms, RRL-MNL and ORRL-MNL, with randomized exploration and frequentist regret guarantees for finite-horizon episodic settings with inhomogeneous state transitions.
• The algorithms aim to achieve both statistical and computational efficiency, with [RRL-MNL] achieving a $\tilde{O}(\kappa^{-1} d^{3/2} H^{3/2} \sqrt{T})$ regret bound and [ORRL-MNL] achieving a $\tilde{O}(d^{3/2} H^{3/2} \sqrt{T} + \kappa^{-1} d^2 H^2)$ regret bound, where $d$ is the dimension of the transition core, $H$ is the horizon length, $T$ is the total number of steps, and $\kappa$ is a problem-dependent constant.

Plain English Explanation

The paper is about improving how reinforcement learning (RL) agents can learn to make good decisions in environments where the probabilities of transitioning between different states depend on both the current state and the action taken. This type of environment is called a Markov decision process (MDP).

The authors propose two new RL algorithms that can efficiently learn and make decisions in these types of environments. The key idea is to use a specific type of function, called a multinomial logistic (MNL) function, to model the unknown transition probabilities between states.

The first algorithm, RRL-MNL, uses a technique called "optimistic sampling" to ensure the agent is always making decisions based on the best possible estimate of the value of each action. This leads to good performance, with a regret bound (a measure of how far the agent's performance is from optimal) that scales with the problem complexity.

The second algorithm, ORRL-MNL, improves on the first by using local gradient information about the MNL transition model to estimate the value function. This leads to an even better regret bound, which is less dependent on a problem-specific constant.

Overall, these algorithms aim to provide RL agents with a efficient and effective way to learn and make decisions in complex environments where the transition probabilities are initially unknown.

Technical Explanation

The paper focuses on RL with MNL function approximation for MDPs with unknown transition probability kernels parameterized by a transition core with state and action features.

For the finite-horizon episodic setting with inhomogeneous state transitions, the authors propose two algorithms:

1. RRL-MNL: This algorithm adapts optimistic sampling to ensure the estimated value function is optimistic with sufficient frequency. The authors show that RRL-MNL is statistically and computationally efficient, achieving a $\tilde{O}(\kappa^{-1} d^{3/2} H^{3/2} \sqrt{T})$ frequentist regret bound with constant-time computational cost per episode.

2. ORRL-MNL: To improve the dependence on $\kappa^{-1}$, this algorithm estimates the value function using local gradient information of the MNL transition model. The authors show that ORRL-MNL has a frequentist regret bound of $\tilde{O}(d^{3/2} H^{3/2} \sqrt{T} + \kappa^{-1} d^2 H^2)$.

The authors claim these are the first randomized RL algorithms for the MNL transition model that achieve both computational and statistical efficiency. Numerical experiments demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed algorithms.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes several important contributions to the field of RL with function approximation. The authors' focus on the MNL transition model is well-justified, as this model is both practical and theoretically interesting. The proposed algorithms, RRL-MNL and ORRL-MNL, are well-designed and have strong theoretical guarantees.

However, the paper does not address the potential limitations of the MNL transition model, such as its inability to capture more complex dependencies between states and actions. Additionally, the authors do not discuss how their algorithms might perform in more general RL settings, such as nonstationary environments or infinite-horizon problems.

Furthermore, the paper does not explore the implications of the algorithms for multi-agent RL or how they might be extended to other function approximation schemes beyond the MNL model.

Overall, the paper represents a significant contribution to the field of RL with function approximation, but there are opportunities for further research to address the limitations and extend the applicability of the proposed algorithms.

Conclusion

This paper presents two provably efficient RL algorithms, RRL-MNL and ORRL-MNL, for learning in MDPs with MNL transition models. The algorithms achieve both statistical and computational efficiency, with strong regret guarantees.

The work is an important step forward in RL with function approximation, demonstrating the potential of the MNL model and randomized exploration techniques to learn effectively in complex environments. While the paper does not address all possible limitations and extensions, it lays the groundwork for further research in this area, which could have significant implications for the development of more robust and capable RL agents.