Neural networks for geospatial data
0
🧠
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Proposed a new neural network estimation algorithm called NN-GLS for non-linear mean functions in Gaussian Process (GP) models
- Showed that NN-GLS can be represented as a special type of Graph Neural Network (GNN)
- Provided theoretical guarantees of consistency and finite-sample concentration rates for NN-GLS on irregularly observed, spatially correlated data
Plain English Explanation
Traditionally, analyzing geospatial data has involved using linear regression models with an assumption of a linear relationship between the variables. The paper proposes relaxing this strong assumption of linearity by embedding neural networks directly within the traditional geostatistical models. This allows for non-linear mean functions while still retaining the advantages of Gaussian Processes, such as explicitly modeling the spatial covariance.
The key innovation is the NN-GLS algorithm, which estimates the non-linear mean function while accounting for the spatial covariance through Generalized Least Squares (GLS). This connection to GLS makes NN-GLS similar to a special type of Graph Neural Network, enabling the use of standard neural network techniques for irregular geospatial data.
Theoretically, the paper shows that NN-GLS will be consistent for irregularly observed, spatially correlated data, and provides a finite-sample concentration rate that quantifies the importance of accurately modeling the spatial covariance when working with dependent data. These are the first large-sample results for a neural network algorithm applied to irregular spatial data.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a new neural network estimation algorithm called NN-GLS for the non-linear mean function in Gaussian Process (GP) models. NN-GLS explicitly accounts for the spatial covariance through Generalized Least Squares (GLS), the same loss used in the linear case.
The authors show that NN-GLS can be represented as a special type of Graph Neural Network (GNN), facilitating the use of standard neural network computational techniques for irregular geospatial data. This enables novel and scalable mini-batching, backpropagation, and kriging schemes.
Theoretically, the paper proves that NN-GLS will be consistent for irregularly observed, spatially correlated data processes. They also provide a finite-sample concentration rate, which quantifies the need to accurately model the spatial covariance when using neural networks for dependent data. These are the first large-sample results for any neural network algorithm applied to irregular spatial data.
The methodology is demonstrated through simulated and real datasets, showing the benefits of the proposed approach compared to traditional linear regression models.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and promising approach for modeling non-linear relationships in geospatial data while retaining the advantages of Gaussian Processes. The NN-GLS algorithm and its connection to GNNs are interesting technical contributions that could enable the use of more flexible neural network models for irregular spatial data.
However, the paper does not address some potential limitations or areas for further research. For example, the performance of NN-GLS may be sensitive to the choice of neural network architecture, and the paper does not explore the impact of different network designs or hyperparameter tuning. Additionally, the theoretical guarantees are provided for the NN-GLS algorithm specifically, but it would be valuable to understand how other neural network approaches for spatial data might perform in comparison.
Further research could also investigate the scalability and computational efficiency of NN-GLS, especially for large-scale geospatial datasets, and explore ways to incorporate additional domain-specific knowledge or constraints into the neural network architecture.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach called NN-GLS that embeds neural networks within traditional geostatistical models to handle non-linear mean functions while retaining the advantages of Gaussian Processes. The connection to Graph Neural Networks enables the use of standard neural network techniques for irregular geospatial data, and the theoretical guarantees provide important insights into the consistency and finite-sample behavior of this approach.
Overall, this research contributes to the growing body of work on using graph neural networks to predict local phenomena and developing reliable and parsimonious learning strategies for spatial data. The proposed NN-GLS algorithm has the potential to significantly improve the modeling of non-linear relationships in geospatial data, with implications for a wide range of applications, from urban planning to environmental monitoring.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🧠
0
Neural networks for geospatial data
Wentao Zhan, Abhirup Datta
Analysis of geospatial data has traditionally been model-based, with a mean model, customarily specified as a linear regression on the covariates, and a covariance model, encoding the spatial dependence. We relax the strong assumption of linearity and propose embedding neural networks directly within the traditional geostatistical models to accommodate non-linear mean functions while retaining all other advantages including use of Gaussian Processes to explicitly model the spatial covariance, enabling inference on the covariate effect through the mean and on the spatial dependence through the covariance, and offering predictions at new locations via kriging. We propose NN-GLS, a new neural network estimation algorithm for the non-linear mean in GP models that explicitly accounts for the spatial covariance through generalized least squares (GLS), the same loss used in the linear case. We show that NN-GLS admits a representation as a special type of graph neural network (GNN). This connection facilitates use of standard neural network computational techniques for irregular geospatial data, enabling novel and scalable mini-batching, backpropagation, and kriging schemes. Theoretically, we show that NN-GLS will be consistent for irregularly observed spatially correlated data processes. We also provide a finite sample concentration rate, which quantifies the need to accurately model the spatial covariance in neural networks for dependent data. To our knowledge, these are the first large-sample results for any neural network algorithm for irregular spatial data. We demonstrate the methodology through simulated and real datasets.
Read more5/28/2024
🧠
0
Spatial Bayesian Neural Networks
Andrew Zammit-Mangion, Michael D. Kaminski, Ba-Hien Tran, Maurizio Filippone, Noel Cressie
interpretable, and well understood models that are routinely employed even though, as is revealed through prior and posterior predictive checks, these can poorly characterise the spatial heterogeneity in the underlying process of interest. Here, we propose a new, flexible class of spatial-process models, which we refer to as spatial Bayesian neural networks (SBNNs). An SBNN leverages the representational capacity of a Bayesian neural network; it is tailored to a spatial setting by incorporating a spatial ``embedding layer'' into the network and, possibly, spatially-varying network parameters. An SBNN is calibrated by matching its finite-dimensional distribution at locations on a fine gridding of space to that of a target process of interest. That process could be easy to simulate from or we may have many realisations from it. We propose several variants of SBNNs, most of which are able to match the finite-dimensional distribution of the target process at the selected grid better than conventional BNNs of similar complexity. We also show that an SBNN can be used to represent a variety of spatial processes often used in practice, such as Gaussian processes, lognormal processes, and max-stable processes. We briefly discuss the tools that could be used to make inference with SBNNs, and we conclude with a discussion of their advantages and limitations.
Read more4/8/2024
🧠
0
Granger Causality using Neural Networks
Malik Shahid Sultan, Samuel Horvath, Hernando Ombao
Dependence between nodes in a network is an important concept that pervades many areas including finance, politics, sociology, genomics and the brain sciences. One way to characterize dependence between components of a multivariate time series data is via Granger Causality (GC). Standard traditional approaches to GC estimation / inference commonly assume linear dynamics, however such simplification does not hold in many real-world applications where signals are inherently non-linear. In such cases, imposing linear models such as vector autoregressive (VAR) models can lead to mis-characterization of true Granger Causal interactions. To overcome this limitation, Tank et al (IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Learning, 2022) proposed a solution that uses neural networks with sparse regularization penalties. The regularization encourages learnable weights to be sparse, which enables inference on GC. This paper overcomes the limitations of current methods by leveraging advances in machine learning and deep learning which have been demonstrated to learn hidden patterns in the data. We propose novel classes of models that can handle underlying non-linearity in a computationally efficient manner, simultaneously providing GC and lag order selection. Firstly, we present the Learned Kernel VAR (LeKVAR) model that learns kernel parameterized by a shared neural net followed by penalization on learnable weights to discover GC structure. Secondly, we show one can directly decouple lags and individual time series importance via decoupled penalties. This is important as we want to select the lag order during the process of GC estimation. This decoupling acts as a filtering and can be extended to any DL model including Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLP), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN), Long Short Term Memory Networks (LSTM), Transformers etc, for simultaneous GC estimation and lag selection.
Read more8/9/2024
0
Generalization of Geometric Graph Neural Networks
Zhiyang Wang, Juan Cervino, Alejandro Ribeiro
In this paper, we study the generalization capabilities of geometric graph neural networks (GNNs). We consider GNNs over a geometric graph constructed from a finite set of randomly sampled points over an embedded manifold with topological information captured. We prove a generalization gap between the optimal empirical risk and the optimal statistical risk of this GNN, which decreases with the number of sampled points from the manifold and increases with the dimension of the underlying manifold. This generalization gap ensures that the GNN trained on a graph on a set of sampled points can be utilized to process other unseen graphs constructed from the same underlying manifold. The most important observation is that the generalization capability can be realized with one large graph instead of being limited to the size of the graph as in previous results. The generalization gap is derived based on the non-asymptotic convergence result of a GNN on the sampled graph to the underlying manifold neural networks (MNNs). We verify this theoretical result with experiments on both Arxiv dataset and Cora dataset.
Read more9/10/2024