Neural Video Representation for Redundancy Reduction and Consistency Preservation

Overview

• Implicit neural representations (INRs) are a way to embed various signals, like video, into networks.
• INRs for videos aim to achieve video compression by embedding video signals into networks and compressing them.
• Existing methods use frame time or extracted features as inputs, but these can have issues like redundancy or difficulty learning frame relationships.

Plain English Explanation

Implicit neural representations (INRs) are a way to represent different types of data, like videos, using neural networks. The idea is to encode the video signal into the weights and structure of the neural network, rather than storing the full video data.

This is useful for video compression, as the compressed neural network can be much smaller than the original video. Existing methods for this use either the time index of each video frame or features extracted from the frames as inputs to the network.

Using extracted features provides more expressive power, as the input is specific to each video. However, these features can contain redundant information, which goes against the goal of compression. Additionally, without explicit time information, it's challenging for the network to learn the relationships between frames.

To address these issues, the researchers propose a new method that uses the high-frequency components of the video frames and the differences between adjacent frames as inputs. This helps reduce redundancy and allows the network to better learn how the frames are related.

Technical Explanation

The researchers' approach is to use the high-frequency components of the video frames and the differences in features between adjacent frames as inputs to the INR network.

The high-frequency components are intended to reduce redundancy in the input features, as the low-frequency information is often repetitive across frames. Using the differences between adjacent frames allows the network to more easily learn the relationships between frames, since the time information is not explicitly provided.

The researchers evaluate their method on a variety of video datasets and compare it to the existing HNeRV approach. Their results show that their method outperforms HNeRV in 90% of the videos tested.

Critical Analysis

The researchers have identified an important issue with existing INR-based video compression methods - the challenge of learning frame-to-frame relationships without explicit time information. Their proposed solution of using high-frequency components and frame differences as inputs is a reasonable approach to address this.

However, the paper does not provide much discussion of potential limitations or areas for further research. For example, it's unclear how the method would perform on videos with rapid or irregular motion, where the frame-to-frame differences may be more complex. Additionally, the computational overhead of extracting the high-frequency components is not explored.

Further research could also investigate ways to adaptively determine the optimal balance between high-frequency and low-frequency components, or to learn this balance as part of the network training process. Incorporating additional techniques like motion estimation could also potentially improve the network's ability to model temporal relationships.

Overall, the researchers have presented a promising approach to improving INR-based video compression, but there are likely opportunities to build upon this work and address potential limitations.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel approach to implicit neural representations (INRs) for video, which aims to improve video compression by reducing feature redundancy and better preserving the relationships between video frames.

The key ideas are to use the high-frequency components of video frames and the differences between adjacent frames as inputs to the INR network, rather than relying on extracted features or frame time indices. This helps address challenges with existing methods, such as feature redundancy and difficulty learning temporal relationships.

The experimental results show that this approach outperforms a state-of-the-art baseline in the majority of test cases. While the paper does not extensively discuss limitations, the proposed method represents a promising step forward for INR-based video compression techniques.