New allometric models for the USA create a step-change in forest carbon estimation, modeling, and mapping
0
🤔
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The United States national forest inventory (NFI) is the foundation for estimating forest aboveground biomass (AGB) and carbon stocks across the country.
- The NFI data is used in both design-based and model-based approaches to estimate forest carbon at different resolutions.
- The Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program has introduced a new National Scale Volume and Biomass Estimators (NSVB) system to replace the previous Component Ratio Method (CRM).
- This change raises concerns about the compatibility of existing CRM-based AGB models and products with the new NSVB system.
Plain English Explanation
The United States government keeps track of the forests in the country through the National Forest Inventory (NFI). This data is used to estimate how much carbon is stored in the trees and other vegetation (known as aboveground biomass or AGB). These estimates are used for things like tracking changes in forest carbon over time and informing forest management decisions.
The NFI data has traditionally been used in two main ways: 1) direct calculations based on the measured tree data, and 2) input into more complex computer models that can make predictions at a finer level of detail. However, the underlying tree and plot-level data from the NFI is not perfect – it's based on regional models called the Component Ratio Method (CRM).
Recently, the Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program introduced a new system called the National Scale Volume and Biomass Estimators (NSVB) to improve the accuracy of these AGB and carbon estimates. This is an important change, as many existing studies and maps rely on the older CRM data. There are concerns about whether the old CRM-based models and products will still be compatible with the new NSVB data.
To address this, the researchers compared maps made using the old CRM data to new maps made with the NSVB data. They found that models using satellite imagery (like Landsat) can provide reasonable estimates of current AGB and carbon stocks, but struggle to accurately capture changes over time in mature, closed-canopy forests. This means the existing CRM-based estimates, models, and maps are no longer compatible with the new NSVB system.
The researchers recommend developing new methods, models, and maps to work with the NSVB data, in order to provide the most accurate possible information on forest carbon to help guide local management and decision-making.
Technical Explanation
The researchers compared previously published forest aboveground biomass (AGB) maps created using the older Component Ratio Method (CRM) to new maps produced using the same methods but with the new National Scale Volume and Biomass Estimators (NSVB) AGB reference data from the Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program.
The CRM was the previous system used to estimate AGB and carbon stocks from the FIA's tree and plot-level data, which forms the foundation of the United States National Forest Inventory (NFI). The NFI data enables both design-based estimates of forest carbon at state and regional scales, as well as model-based approaches for finer-resolution mapping.
However, the CRM AGB estimates are themselves based on regional species-group models, rather than direct measurements. In 2023, the FIA introduced the new NSVB system to provide more precise and accurate representations of forest AGB and carbon.
Given the prevalence of model-based AGB studies relying on FIA data, the researchers were concerned about the compatibility of existing CRM-based AGB products with the new NSVB system. Their comparison found that models using passive satellite imagery (like Landsat) can provide acceptable estimates of point-in-time NSVB AGB and carbon stocks. However, these models fail to accurately quantify growth in mature, closed-canopy forests.
The researchers conclude that existing CRM-based estimates, models, and maps are no longer compatible with NSVB, and they recommend developing new methods, models, and maps to accommodate this step-change in the underlying data. Adopting NSVB in modeling and mapping workflows will help provide the most accurate spatial forest carbon data to inform local management and decision-making.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research in their paper. They note that their comparison of CRM and NSVB-based maps was limited to a single study area, and that further research is needed to evaluate the transferability of their findings to other regions.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed assessment of the specific reasons why the satellite-based models struggled to capture growth in mature forests. More investigation into the underlying drivers of this limitation would be valuable for informing the development of improved modeling approaches.
The researchers also do not explore the potential implications of this step-change in the underlying AGB data for existing carbon accounting and monitoring efforts. It would be helpful to understand the scale and nature of the discrepancies between CRM and NSVB-based estimates, and how this might impact things like national and international forest carbon reporting.
Overall, the paper makes an important contribution by highlighting the need to revisit existing AGB and carbon mapping methods in light of the transition to the new NSVB system. However, deeper exploration of the technical details and broader implications of this change would strengthen the analysis and provide more guidance for the research community.
Conclusion
The transition from the Component Ratio Method (CRM) to the new National Scale Volume and Biomass Estimators (NSVB) system in the United States Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program represents a significant step forward in the accuracy of forest aboveground biomass (AGB) and carbon stock estimates.
However, this change also raises concerns about the compatibility of existing CRM-based AGB models and products. The researchers' comparison of CRM and NSVB-based mapping approaches suggests that while satellite-based models can provide reasonable point-in-time AGB estimates, they struggle to accurately capture growth dynamics in mature forests.
This finding underscores the need for the research community to develop new methods, models, and maps specifically tailored to the NSVB data. Adopting these updated approaches will be crucial for providing the most accurate and up-to-date spatial information on forest carbon to inform local management decisions and support national and global carbon accounting efforts.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤔
0
New allometric models for the USA create a step-change in forest carbon estimation, modeling, and mapping
Lucas K. Johnson (State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry), Michael J. Mahoney (State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry), Grant Domke (USDA Forest Service), Colin M. Beier (State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry)
The United States national forest inventory (NFI) serves as the foundation for forest aboveground biomass (AGB) and carbon accounting across the nation. These data enable design-based estimates of forest carbon stocks and stock-changes at state and regional levels, but also serve as inputs to model-based approaches for characterizing forest carbon stocks and stock-changes at finer resolutions. Although NFI tree and plot-level data are often treated as truth in these models, they are in fact estimates based on regional species-group models known collectively as the Component Ratio Method (CRM). In late 2023 the Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program introduced a new National Scale Volume and Biomass Estimators (NSVB) system to replace CRM nationwide and offer more precise and accurate representations of forest AGB and carbon. Given the prevalence of model-based AGB studies relying on FIA, there is concern about the transferability of methods from CRM to NSVB models, as well as the comparability of existing CRM AGB products (e.g. maps) to new and forthcoming NSVB AGB products. To begin addressing these concerns we compared previously published CRM AGB maps to new maps produced using identical methods with NSVB AGB reference data. Our results suggest that models relying on passive satellite imagery (e.g. Landsat) provide acceptable estimates of point-in-time NSVB AGB and carbon stocks, but fail to accurately quantify growth in mature closed-canopy forests. We highlight that existing estimates, models, and maps based on FIA reference data are no longer compatible with NSVB, and recommend new methods as well as updated models and maps for accommodating this step-change. Our collective ability to adopt NSVB in our modeling and mapping workflows will help us provide the most accurate spatial forest carbon data possible in order to better inform local management and decision making.
Read more5/9/2024
0
Comparing remote sensing-based forest biomass mapping approaches using new forest inventory plots in contrasting forests in northeastern and southwestern China
Wenquan Dong, Edward T. A. Mitchard, Yuwei Chen, Man Chen, Congfeng Cao, Peilun Hu, Cong Xu, Steven Hancock
Large-scale high spatial resolution aboveground biomass (AGB) maps play a crucial role in determining forest carbon stocks and how they are changing, which is instrumental in understanding the global carbon cycle, and implementing policy to mitigate climate change. The advent of the new space-borne LiDAR sensor, NASA's GEDI instrument, provides unparalleled possibilities for the accurate and unbiased estimation of forest AGB at high resolution, particularly in dense and tall forests, where Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) and passive optical data exhibit saturation. However, GEDI is a sampling instrument, collecting dispersed footprints, and its data must be combined with that from other continuous cover satellites to create high-resolution maps, using local machine learning methods. In this study, we developed local models to estimate forest AGB from GEDI L2A data, as the models used to create GEDI L4 AGB data incorporated minimal field data from China. We then applied LightGBM and random forest regression to generate wall-to-wall AGB maps at 25 m resolution, using extensive GEDI footprints as well as Sentinel-1 data, ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 and Sentinel-2 optical data. Through a 5-fold cross-validation, LightGBM demonstrated a slightly better performance than Random Forest across two contrasting regions. However, in both regions, the computation speed of LightGBM is substantially faster than that of the random forest model, requiring roughly one-third of the time to compute on the same hardware. Through the validation against field data, the 25 m resolution AGB maps generated using the local models developed in this study exhibited higher accuracy compared to the GEDI L4B AGB data. We found in both regions an increase in error as slope increased. The trained models were tested on nearby but different regions and exhibited good performance.
Read more5/27/2024
0
Fine-tuning of Geospatial Foundation Models for Aboveground Biomass Estimation
Michal Muszynski, Levente Klein, Ademir Ferreira da Silva, Anjani Prasad Atluri, Carlos Gomes, Daniela Szwarcman, Gurkanwar Singh, Kewen Gu, Maciel Zortea, Naomi Simumba, Paolo Fraccaro, Shraddha Singh, Steve Meliksetian, Campbell Watson, Daiki Kimura, Harini Srinivasan
Global vegetation structure mapping is critical for understanding the global carbon cycle and maximizing the efficacy of nature-based carbon sequestration initiatives. Moreover, vegetation structure mapping can help reduce the impacts of climate change by, for example, guiding actions to improve water security, increase biodiversity and reduce flood risk. Global satellite measurements provide an important set of observations for monitoring and managing deforestation and degradation of existing forests, natural forest regeneration, reforestation, biodiversity restoration, and the implementation of sustainable agricultural practices. In this paper, we explore the effectiveness of fine-tuning of a geospatial foundation model to estimate above-ground biomass (AGB) using space-borne data collected across different eco-regions in Brazil. The fine-tuned model architecture consisted of a Swin-B transformer as the encoder (i.e., backbone) and a single convolutional layer for the decoder head. All results were compared to a U-Net which was trained as the baseline model Experimental results of this sparse-label prediction task demonstrate that the fine-tuned geospatial foundation model with a frozen encoder has comparable performance to a U-Net trained from scratch. This is despite the fine-tuned model having 13 times less parameters requiring optimization, which saves both time and compute resources. Further, we explore the transfer-learning capabilities of the geospatial foundation models by fine-tuning on satellite imagery with sparse labels from different eco-regions in Brazil.
Read more7/1/2024
0
Unified Deep Learning Model for Global Prediction of Aboveground Biomass, Canopy Height and Cover from High-Resolution, Multi-Sensor Satellite Imagery
Manuel Weber, Carly Beneke, Clyde Wheeler
Regular measurement of carbon stock in the world's forests is critical for carbon accounting and reporting under national and international climate initiatives, and for scientific research, but has been largely limited in scalability and temporal resolution due to a lack of ground based assessments. Increasing efforts have been made to address these challenges by incorporating remotely sensed data. We present a new methodology which uses multi-sensor, multi-spectral imagery at a resolution of 10 meters and a deep learning based model which unifies the prediction of above ground biomass density (AGBD), canopy height (CH), canopy cover (CC) as well as uncertainty estimations for all three quantities. The model is trained on millions of globally sampled GEDI-L2/L4 measurements. We validate the capability of our model by deploying it over the entire globe for the year 2023 as well as annually from 2016 to 2023 over selected areas. The model achieves a mean absolute error for AGBD (CH, CC) of 26.1 Mg/ha (3.7 m, 9.9 %) and a root mean squared error of 50.6 Mg/ha (5.4 m, 15.8 %) on a globally sampled test dataset, demonstrating a significant improvement over previously published results. We also report the model performance against independently collected ground measurements published in the literature, which show a high degree of correlation across varying conditions. We further show that our pre-trained model facilitates seamless transferability to other GEDI variables due to its multi-head architecture.
Read more8/22/2024