A New Analysis of Differential Privacy's Generalization Guarantees

1909.03577

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 6/5/2024 by Christopher Jung, Katrina Ligett, Seth Neel, Aaron Roth, Saeed Sharifi-Malvajerdi, Moshe Shenfeld

📊

Abstract

We give a new proof of the transfer theorem underlying adaptive data analysis: that any mechanism for answering adaptively chosen statistical queries that is differentially private and sample-accurate is also accurate out-of-sample. Our new proof is elementary and gives structural insights that we expect will be useful elsewhere. We show: 1) that differential privacy ensures that the expectation of any query on the posterior distribution on datasets induced by the transcript of the interaction is close to its true value on the data distribution, and 2) sample accuracy on its own ensures that any query answer produced by the mechanism is close to its posterior expectation with high probability. This second claim follows from a thought experiment in which we imagine that the dataset is resampled from the posterior distribution after the mechanism has committed to its answers. The transfer theorem then follows by summing these two bounds, and in particular, avoids the monitor argument used to derive high probability bounds in prior work. An upshot of our new proof technique is that the concrete bounds we obtain are substantially better than the best previously known bounds, even though the improvements are in the constants, rather than the asymptotics (which are known to be tight). As we show, our new bounds outperform the naive sample-splitting baseline at dramatically smaller dataset sizes compared to the previous state of the art, bringing techniques from this literature closer to practicality.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a new proof for the "transfer theorem" underlying adaptive data analysis, which shows that mechanisms for answering adaptively chosen statistical queries that are differentially private and sample-accurate are also accurate out-of-sample.
  • The new proof is more elementary and provides structural insights that the authors expect will be useful in other contexts.
  • The key ideas are: 1) differential privacy ensures the expected value of any query on the posterior distribution is close to its true value on the data distribution, and 2) sample accuracy ensures any query answer is close to its posterior expectation with high probability.
  • The new proof avoids the "monitor argument" used in prior work and provides substantially better concrete bounds than the previous state of the art.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a fundamental result in the field of adaptive data analysis, which is the study of how to analyze data in a way that is robust to the process of analyzing the data itself. Specifically, the "transfer theorem" shows that if you have a way of answering statistical queries about a dataset that is both differentially private and accurate on the sample data, then that mechanism will also be accurate on new, unseen data.

The authors present a new, simpler proof of this transfer theorem that provides additional insights. The key ideas are:

  1. Differential privacy: If a mechanism is differentially private, it means that the answers it provides don't depend too much on any individual data point. This ensures that the expected value of any query on the "posterior distribution" (the distribution of datasets that are consistent with the query answers) is close to the true value on the original data distribution.

  2. Sample accuracy: If a mechanism is accurate on the sample data, that means any query answer it produces is close to the expected value on the posterior distribution. This follows from a thought experiment where we imagine the dataset is resampled from the posterior after the mechanism has committed to its answers.

By combining these two ideas, the authors show that differentially private and sample-accurate mechanisms will also be accurate on new, unseen data. Importantly, their new proof technique allows them to derive concrete bounds that are substantially better than prior work, bringing these techniques closer to practical use.

Technical Explanation

The core of the paper is a new proof of the "transfer theorem" for adaptive data analysis. This theorem shows that any mechanism for answering adaptively chosen statistical queries that is both differentially private and sample-accurate is also accurate out-of-sample.

The authors' new proof has two key components:

  1. Differential privacy ensures posterior accuracy: They show that differential privacy implies the expectation of any query on the posterior distribution (the distribution of datasets consistent with the transcript of the interaction) is close to its true value on the data distribution. This follows from the properties of differentially private mechanisms.

  2. Sample accuracy ensures posterior concentration: They then show that sample accuracy on its own ensures any query answer produced by the mechanism is close to its posterior expectation with high probability. This uses a thought experiment where the dataset is resampled from the posterior after the mechanism has committed to its answers.

By combining these two bounds, the transfer theorem follows. Importantly, this new proof technique avoids the "monitor argument" used in prior work, and results in substantially better concrete bounds, even though the asymptotic rates are the same.

The authors demonstrate that their new bounds outperform the naive sample-splitting baseline at much smaller dataset sizes compared to the previous state of the art. This brings techniques from this literature closer to practical use in areas like causal inference with differentially private clustered outcomes or generalization in the face of adaptivity from a Bayesian perspective.

Critical Analysis

The authors acknowledge some limitations of their work. Firstly, while their new bounds are substantially better than prior results, the improvements are in the constants rather than the asymptotic rates, which are known to be tight. It's an open question whether further improvements are possible.

Additionally, the authors' proof technique relies on a specific technical condition called "approximate sufficiency," which may not hold in all settings. Extensions to more general query types or mechanisms could be an area for future research.

That said, the authors' new proof is a valuable contribution, as it provides structural insights that may be useful beyond this particular problem. The clear explanations and comparisons to prior work also make the paper accessible to a broader audience.

Overall, this work represents a meaningful advance in our understanding of the fundamental limits of adaptive data analysis, with potentially important implications for fields like causal inference and Bayesian generalization that rely on these techniques.

Conclusion

This paper presents a new, more elementary proof of the transfer theorem for adaptive data analysis, which shows that differentially private and sample-accurate mechanisms are also accurate out-of-sample. The key ideas are that differential privacy ensures posterior accuracy, while sample accuracy ensures posterior concentration.

The authors' new proof technique avoids the limitations of prior work and yields substantially better concrete bounds, bringing these techniques closer to practical use in areas like causal inference and Bayesian generalization. While the asymptotic rates cannot be improved, the structural insights from this work may be valuable in other contexts as well.

Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in our theoretical understanding of the fundamental limits of adaptive data analysis, with potential implications for a wide range of applications that rely on these techniques.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

🛠️

Differential Privacy via Distributionally Robust Optimization

Aras Selvi, Huikang Liu, Wolfram Wiesemann

YC

0

Reddit

0

In recent years, differential privacy has emerged as the de facto standard for sharing statistics of datasets while limiting the disclosure of private information about the involved individuals. This is achieved by randomly perturbing the statistics to be published, which in turn leads to a privacy-accuracy trade-off: larger perturbations provide stronger privacy guarantees, but they result in less accurate statistics that offer lower utility to the recipients. Of particular interest are therefore optimal mechanisms that provide the highest accuracy for a pre-selected level of privacy. To date, work in this area has focused on specifying families of perturbations a priori and subsequently proving their asymptotic and/or best-in-class optimality. In this paper, we develop a class of mechanisms that enjoy non-asymptotic and unconditional optimality guarantees. To this end, we formulate the mechanism design problem as an infinite-dimensional distributionally robust optimization problem. We show that the problem affords a strong dual, and we exploit this duality to develop converging hierarchies of finite-dimensional upper and lower bounding problems. Our upper (primal) bounds correspond to implementable perturbations whose suboptimality can be bounded by our lower (dual) bounds. Both bounding problems can be solved within seconds via cutting plane techniques that exploit the inherent problem structure. Our numerical experiments demonstrate that our perturbations can outperform the previously best results from the literature on artificial as well as standard benchmark problems.

Read more

5/24/2024

🔮

Generalization in the Face of Adaptivity: A Bayesian Perspective

Moshe Shenfeld, Katrina Ligett

YC

0

Reddit

0

Repeated use of a data sample via adaptively chosen queries can rapidly lead to overfitting, wherein the empirical evaluation of queries on the sample significantly deviates from their mean with respect to the underlying data distribution. It turns out that simple noise addition algorithms suffice to prevent this issue, and differential privacy-based analysis of these algorithms shows that they can handle an asymptotically optimal number of queries. However, differential privacy's worst-case nature entails scaling such noise to the range of the queries even for highly-concentrated queries, or introducing more complex algorithms. In this paper, we prove that straightforward noise-addition algorithms already provide variance-dependent guarantees that also extend to unbounded queries. This improvement stems from a novel characterization that illuminates the core problem of adaptive data analysis. We show that the harm of adaptivity results from the covariance between the new query and a Bayes factor-based measure of how much information about the data sample was encoded in the responses given to past queries. We then leverage this characterization to introduce a new data-dependent stability notion that can bound this covariance.

Read more

4/5/2024

🌐

Unified Mechanism-Specific Amplification by Subsampling and Group Privacy Amplification

Jan Schuchardt, Mihail Stoian, Arthur Kosmala, Stephan Gunnemann

YC

0

Reddit

0

Amplification by subsampling is one of the main primitives in machine learning with differential privacy (DP): Training a model on random batches instead of complete datasets results in stronger privacy. This is traditionally formalized via mechanism-agnostic subsampling guarantees that express the privacy parameters of a subsampled mechanism as a function of the original mechanism's privacy parameters. We propose the first general framework for deriving mechanism-specific guarantees, which leverage additional information beyond these parameters to more tightly characterize the subsampled mechanism's privacy. Such guarantees are of particular importance for privacy accounting, i.e., tracking privacy over multiple iterations. Overall, our framework based on conditional optimal transport lets us derive existing and novel guarantees for approximate DP, accounting with R'enyi DP, and accounting with dominating pairs in a unified, principled manner. As an application, we analyze how subsampling affects the privacy of groups of multiple users. Our tight mechanism-specific bounds outperform tight mechanism-agnostic bounds and classic group privacy results.

Read more

6/12/2024

📊

Adaptive Data Analysis for Growing Data

Neil G. Marchant, Benjamin I. P. Rubinstein

YC

0

Reddit

0

Reuse of data in adaptive workflows poses challenges regarding overfitting and the statistical validity of results. Previous work has demonstrated that interacting with data via differentially private algorithms can mitigate overfitting, achieving worst-case generalization guarantees with asymptotically optimal data requirements. However, such past work assumes data is static and cannot accommodate situations where data grows over time. In this paper we address this gap, presenting the first generalization bounds for adaptive analysis in the dynamic data setting. We allow the analyst to adaptively schedule their queries conditioned on the current size of the data, in addition to previous queries and responses. We also incorporate time-varying empirical accuracy bounds and mechanisms, allowing for tighter guarantees as data accumulates. In a batched query setting, the asymptotic data requirements of our bound grows with the square-root of the number of adaptive queries, matching prior works' improvement over data splitting for the static setting. We instantiate our bound for statistical queries with the clipped Gaussian mechanism, where it empirically outperforms baselines composed from static bounds.

Read more

5/24/2024