A New Approach Towards Autoformalization

Read original: arXiv:2310.07957 - Published 7/11/2024 by Nilay Patel, Rahul Saha, Jeffrey Flanigan
Total Score

0

🤯

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Verifying mathematical proofs is challenging, but can be automated with computer assistance
  • Autoformalization is the task of automatically translating natural language mathematics into a formal language for verification
  • This is a difficult task, especially for higher-level mathematics found in research papers, which require significant background knowledge and context
  • The paper proposes breaking autoformalization into subtasks: unlinked formalization, entity linking, and adjusting types
  • The authors present arXiv2Formal, a benchmark dataset for unlinked formalization, consisting of 50 theorems from arXiv.org papers formalized for the Lean theorem prover

Plain English Explanation

Mathematical proofs can be extremely complex, making it difficult for humans to verify them. However, computers can help automate this verification process. The key challenge is autoformalization - the task of automatically translating natural language mathematics into a formal language that a computer program can understand and validate.

This is especially challenging for mathematics found in research papers, which often builds on a vast amount of background knowledge and context. To make the autoformalization task more manageable, the researchers propose breaking it down into smaller, more approachable subtasks:

  1. Unlinked formalization: Translating the mathematics into a formal language without connecting it to the relevant definitions and theorems.
  2. Entity linking: Linking the formal expressions to the appropriate theorems and definitions.
  3. Type adjustment: Ensuring the formalized expressions pass the computer's type-checking process.

The researchers also introduce a new dataset called arXiv2Formal, which contains 50 theorems from research papers on the arXiv.org preprint server that have been formalized for the Lean theorem prover. This dataset can be used to benchmark and improve autoformalization systems.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a strategy for tackling the challenge of autoformalization - the automatic translation of natural language mathematics into a formal language that can be verified by a computer program.

The key insight is to break down the autoformalization task into more manageable subtasks:

  1. Unlinked formalization: Translating the mathematics into a formal language without connecting it to the relevant definitions and theorems. This serves as an intermediate step before the full formalization.
  2. Entity linking: Identifying and linking the formal expressions to the appropriate theorems and definitions from the mathematical background.
  3. Type adjustment: Ensuring the formalized expressions pass the type-checking process of the target formal system.

The paper also introduces a new benchmark dataset called arXiv2Formal, which contains 50 theorems from research papers on the arXiv.org preprint server that have been formalized for the Lean theorem prover. This dataset can be used to evaluate and improve autoformalization systems.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach to tackling the challenge of autoformalization, particularly for the higher-level mathematics found in research papers. By breaking down the task into more approachable subtasks, the researchers aim to make progress on this longstanding problem.

However, the paper does not address several important limitations and areas for further research:

  • The performance and scalability of the proposed approach is not thoroughly evaluated, especially for more complex mathematical content.
  • The arXiv2Formal dataset, while a valuable contribution, is still relatively small and may not capture the full breadth of mathematical content in research papers.
  • The paper does not discuss the potential challenges in automating the entity linking and type adjustment subtasks, which may require advanced natural language processing and reasoning capabilities.

Future research should focus on addressing these limitations, expanding the benchmark dataset, and exploring more advanced techniques for autoformalization, such as leveraging large language models or incorporating domain-specific knowledge.

Conclusion

This paper proposes a novel approach to the challenge of autoformalization - the automatic translation of natural language mathematics into a formal language for computer verification. By breaking down the task into more manageable subtasks, the researchers aim to make progress on this longstanding problem, especially for the complex mathematics found in research papers.

The introduction of the arXiv2Formal benchmark dataset is a valuable contribution that can help drive further advancements in this field. While the paper has some limitations, it represents an important step towards automating the verification of mathematical proofs, which could have significant implications for the advancement of mathematics and science.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤯

Total Score

0

A New Approach Towards Autoformalization

Nilay Patel, Rahul Saha, Jeffrey Flanigan

Verifying mathematical proofs is difficult, but can be automated with the assistance of a computer. Autoformalization is the task of automatically translating natural language mathematics into a formal language that can be verified by a program. This is a challenging task, and especially for higher-level mathematics found in research papers. Research paper mathematics requires large amounts of background and context. In this paper, we propose an avenue towards tackling autoformalization for research-level mathematics, by breaking the task into easier and more approachable subtasks: unlinked formalization (formalization with unlinked definitions and theorems), entity linking (linking to the proper theorems and definitions), and finally adjusting types so it passes the type checker. In addition, we present arXiv2Formal, a benchmark dataset for unlinked formalization consisting of 50 theorems formalized for the Lean theorem prover sampled from papers on arXiv.org. We welcome any contributions from the community to future versions of this dataset.

Read more

7/11/2024

Improving Autoformalization using Type Checking
Total Score

0

Improving Autoformalization using Type Checking

Auguste Poiroux, Gail Weiss, Viktor Kunv{c}ak, Antoine Bosselut

Large language models show promise for autoformalization, the task of automatically translating natural language into formal languages. However, current autoformalization methods remain limited. The last reported state-of-the-art performance on the ProofNet formalization benchmark for the Lean proof assistant, achieved using Codex for Lean 3, only showed successful formalization of 16.1% of informal statements. Similarly, our evaluation of GPT-4o for Lean 4 only produces successful translations 34.9% of the time. Our analysis shows that the performance of these models is largely limited by their inability to generate formal statements that successfully type-check (i.e., are syntactically correct and consistent with types) - with a whopping 86.6% of GPT-4o errors starting from a type-check failure. In this work, we propose a method to fix this issue through decoding with type-check filtering, where we initially sample a diverse set of candidate formalizations for an informal statement, then use the Lean proof assistant to filter out candidates that do not type-check. Using GPT-4o as a base model, and combining our method with self-consistency, we obtain a +18.3% absolute increase in formalization accuracy, and achieve a new state-of-the-art of 53.2% on ProofNet with Lean 4.

Read more

6/12/2024

Autoformalizing Euclidean Geometry
Total Score

0

Autoformalizing Euclidean Geometry

Logan Murphy, Kaiyu Yang, Jialiang Sun, Zhaoyu Li, Anima Anandkumar, Xujie Si

Autoformalization involves automatically translating informal math into formal theorems and proofs that are machine-verifiable. Euclidean geometry provides an interesting and controllable domain for studying autoformalization. In this paper, we introduce a neuro-symbolic framework for autoformalizing Euclidean geometry, which combines domain knowledge, SMT solvers, and large language models (LLMs). One challenge in Euclidean geometry is that informal proofs rely on diagrams, leaving gaps in texts that are hard to formalize. To address this issue, we use theorem provers to fill in such diagrammatic information automatically, so that the LLM only needs to autoformalize the explicit textual steps, making it easier for the model. We also provide automatic semantic evaluation for autoformalized theorem statements. We construct LeanEuclid, an autoformalization benchmark consisting of problems from Euclid's Elements and the UniGeo dataset formalized in the Lean proof assistant. Experiments with GPT-4 and GPT-4V show the capability and limitations of state-of-the-art LLMs on autoformalizing geometry problems. The data and code are available at https://github.com/loganrjmurphy/LeanEuclid.

Read more

5/28/2024

Process-Driven Autoformalization in Lean 4
Total Score

0

Process-Driven Autoformalization in Lean 4

Jianqiao Lu, Zhengying Liu, Yingjia Wan, Yinya Huang, Haiming Wang, Zhicheng Yang, Jing Tang, Zhijiang Guo

Autoformalization, the conversion of natural language mathematics into formal languages, offers significant potential for advancing mathematical reasoning. However, existing efforts are limited to formal languages with substantial online corpora and struggle to keep pace with rapidly evolving languages like Lean 4. To bridge this gap, we propose a new benchmark textbf{Form}alization for textbf{L}ean~textbf{4} (textbf{name}) designed to evaluate the autoformalization capabilities of large language models (LLMs). This benchmark encompasses a comprehensive assessment of questions, answers, formal statements, and proofs. Additionally, we introduce a textbf{P}rocess-textbf{S}upervised textbf{V}erifier (textbf{PSV}) model that leverages the precise feedback from Lean 4 compilers to enhance autoformalization. Our experiments demonstrate that the PSV method improves autoformalization, enabling higher accuracy using less filtered training data. Furthermore, when fine-tuned with data containing detailed process information, PSV can leverage the data more effectively, leading to more significant improvements in autoformalization for Lean 4. Our dataset and code are available at url{https://github.com/rookie-joe/PDA}.

Read more

6/5/2024