New Bounds on Quantum Sample Complexity of Measurement Classes
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents new bounds on the quantum sample complexity of measurement classes, which is the minimum number of quantum samples required to learn a specific type of measurement.
- The authors derive these bounds using techniques from information theory and computational learning theory.
- The results have implications for the efficiency of quantum learning algorithms and the fundamental limits of quantum information processing.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on understanding the minimum number of quantum samples required to "learn" a specific type of quantum measurement. This is an important question because it gets at the fundamental limits of what can be achieved with quantum computers and algorithms.
The key idea is that instead of trying to learn a general quantum state or process, the researchers are looking at a more specific type of learning task - learning a particular kind of quantum measurement. This makes the problem more tractable to analyze mathematically.
Using techniques from information theory and computational learning theory, the authors derive new upper and lower bounds on the number of quantum samples required. These bounds provide a more precise characterization of the "sample complexity" of this type of quantum learning problem.
The results have implications for designing efficient quantum learning algorithms and understanding the fundamental limits of what can be achieved with quantum information processing.
Technical Explanation
The paper studies the quantum sample complexity of measurement classes, which refers to the minimum number of quantum samples required to learn a specific type of quantum measurement. The authors use tools from information theory and computational learning theory to derive upper and lower bounds on the sample complexity.
Specifically, the authors consider the problem of learning a quantum measurement specified by a positive semidefinite operator M. They show that the quantum sample complexity of learning M is bounded above by a term that depends on the rank and trace norm of M, as well as the desired accuracy and confidence parameters. They also prove a lower bound that depends on the dimension of the underlying Hilbert space and the minimum eigenvalue of M.
These results provide a more precise characterization of the sample complexity for this type of quantum learning task, compared to previous work. The bounds have implications for the design of efficient quantum learning algorithms and our understanding of the fundamental limits of quantum information processing.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a valuable contribution by deriving new upper and lower bounds on the quantum sample complexity of measurement classes. These bounds provide a more detailed understanding of the sample complexity for a specific type of quantum learning problem.
One potential limitation is that the analysis focuses on a rather specific scenario - learning a single quantum measurement specified by a positive semidefinite operator. It would be interesting to see if the techniques can be extended to more general quantum learning tasks, such as learning a collection of measurements or learning a quantum channel.
Additionally, the paper does not discuss potential applications or real-world implications of the results. It would be helpful to see a discussion of how these bounds could inform the design of practical quantum learning algorithms or the development of quantum technologies.
Overall, the technical contributions of the paper are solid, but more work may be needed to fully understand the significance and broader impact of the results.
Conclusion
This paper presents new upper and lower bounds on the quantum sample complexity of measurement classes, which characterize the minimum number of quantum samples required to learn a specific type of quantum measurement. The results leverage techniques from information theory and computational learning theory, and have implications for the efficiency of quantum learning algorithms and the fundamental limits of quantum information processing.
While the analysis is focused on a relatively narrow problem setting, the work represents an important step forward in our understanding of quantum sample complexity. Further research exploring more general quantum learning tasks and real-world applications would help to fully realize the value of these theoretical bounds.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
New Bounds on Quantum Sample Complexity of Measurement Classes
Mohsen Heidari, Wojciech Szpankowski
This paper studies quantum supervised learning for classical inference from quantum states. In this model, a learner has access to a set of labeled quantum samples as the training set. The objective is to find a quantum measurement that predicts the label of the unseen samples. The hardness of learning is measured via sample complexity under a quantum counterpart of the well-known probably approximately correct (PAC). Quantum sample complexity is expected to be higher than classical one, because of the measurement incompatibility and state collapse. Recent efforts showed that the sample complexity of learning a finite quantum concept class $mathcal{C}$ scales as $O(|mathcal{C}|)$. This is significantly higher than the classical sample complexity that grows logarithmically with the class size. This work improves the sample complexity bound to $O(V_{mathcal{C}^*} log |mathcal{C}^*|)$, where $mathcal{C}^*$ is the set of extreme points of the convex closure of $mathcal{C}$ and $V_{mathcal{C}^*}$ is the shadow-norm of this set. We show the tightness of our bound for the class of bounded Hilbert-Schmidt norm, scaling as $O(log |mathcal{C}^*|)$. Our approach is based on a new quantum empirical risk minimization (ERM) algorithm equipped with a shadow tomography method.
Read more8/26/2024
0
Concept learning of parameterized quantum models from limited measurements
Beng Yee Gan, Po-Wei Huang, Elies Gil-Fuster, Patrick Rebentrost
Classical learning of the expectation values of observables for quantum states is a natural variant of learning quantum states or channels. While learning-theoretic frameworks establish the sample complexity and the number of measurement shots per sample required for learning such statistical quantities, the interplay between these two variables has not been adequately quantified before. In this work, we take the probabilistic nature of quantum measurements into account in classical modelling and discuss these quantities under a single unified learning framework. We provide provable guarantees for learning parameterized quantum models that also quantify the asymmetrical effects and interplay of the two variables on the performance of learning algorithms. These results show that while increasing the sample size enhances the learning performance of classical machines, even with single-shot estimates, the improvements from increasing measurements become asymptotically trivial beyond a constant factor. We further apply our framework and theoretical guarantees to study the impact of measurement noise on the classical surrogation of parameterized quantum circuit models. Our work provides new tools to analyse the operational influence of finite measurement noise in the classical learning of quantum systems.
Read more8/12/2024
📊
0
Information-theoretic generalization bounds for learning from quantum data
Matthias Caro, Tom Gur, Cambyse Rouz'e, Daniel Stilck Franc{c}a, Sathyawageeswar Subramanian
Learning tasks play an increasingly prominent role in quantum information and computation. They range from fundamental problems such as state discrimination and metrology over the framework of quantum probably approximately correct (PAC) learning, to the recently proposed shadow variants of state tomography. However, the many directions of quantum learning theory have so far evolved separately. We propose a general mathematical formalism for describing quantum learning by training on classical-quantum data and then testing how well the learned hypothesis generalizes to new data. In this framework, we prove bounds on the expected generalization error of a quantum learner in terms of classical and quantum information-theoretic quantities measuring how strongly the learner's hypothesis depends on the specific data seen during training. To achieve this, we use tools from quantum optimal transport and quantum concentration inequalities to establish non-commutative versions of decoupling lemmas that underlie recent information-theoretic generalization bounds for classical machine learning. Our framework encompasses and gives intuitively accessible generalization bounds for a variety of quantum learning scenarios such as quantum state discrimination, PAC learning quantum states, quantum parameter estimation, and quantumly PAC learning classical functions. Thereby, our work lays a foundation for a unifying quantum information-theoretic perspective on quantum learning.
Read more6/21/2024
🔗
0
Statistical Complexity of Quantum Learning
Leonardo Banchi, Jason Luke Pereira, Sharu Theresa Jose, Osvaldo Simeone
Recent years have seen significant activity on the problem of using data for the purpose of learning properties of quantum systems or of processing classical or quantum data via quantum computing. As in classical learning, quantum learning problems involve settings in which the mechanism generating the data is unknown, and the main goal of a learning algorithm is to ensure satisfactory accuracy levels when only given access to data and, possibly, side information such as expert knowledge. This article reviews the complexity of quantum learning using information-theoretic techniques by focusing on data complexity, copy complexity, and model complexity. Copy complexity arises from the destructive nature of quantum measurements, which irreversibly alter the state to be processed, limiting the information that can be extracted about quantum data. For example, in a quantum system, unlike in classical machine learning, it is generally not possible to evaluate the training loss simultaneously on multiple hypotheses using the same quantum data. To make the paper self-contained and approachable by different research communities, we provide extensive background material on classical results from statistical learning theory, as well as on the distinguishability of quantum states. Throughout, we highlight the differences between quantum and classical learning by addressing both supervised and unsupervised learning, and we provide extensive pointers to the literature.
Read more4/17/2024