A new paradigm for global sensitivity analysis
0
⛏️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Current global sensitivity analysis methods have limitations, such as focusing only on output variance and requiring independent inputs.
- Existing sensitivity indices can be difficult to interpret, especially for interaction effects.
- Researchers have proposed new sensitivity indices based on user-defined importance measures, but a systematic theory for defining interactions is still missing.
Plain English Explanation
A new paradigm is presented that solves these important problems. By partitioning the inputs into those causing changes in the output and those that do not, the method can identify arbitrary user-defined variability measures using the outcomes of a factorial experiment. This allows for the calculation of all factorial effects without assuming any functional decomposition. The researchers also study and utilize weighted factorial effects to link well-known sensitivity indices like Sobol indices and Shapley effects.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a new approach to global sensitivity analysis that overcomes the limitations of current methods. Traditional nonlinear functional ANOVA decomposition is restricted to the output's variance and requires independent inputs. The resulting sensitivity indices can also be difficult to interpret, especially for interaction effects.
The researchers propose a new paradigm that partitions the inputs into those causing changes in the output and those that do not. This allows them to identify arbitrary user-defined variability measures using the outcomes of a factorial experiment. This factorial approach enables the calculation of all effects without assuming any functional decomposition.
To link various well-known sensitivity indices like Sobol indices and Shapley effects, the researchers study and utilize weighted factorial effects.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling new approach to global sensitivity analysis that addresses several limitations of existing methods. By partitioning the inputs and using a factorial experiment design, the researchers are able to overcome the restriction to output variance and the need for independent inputs.
However, the paper does not provide much detail on the practical implementation or potential challenges of the new paradigm. It also does not explore the performance or computational efficiency of the approach compared to other sensitivity analysis techniques.
Additionally, while the researchers link their method to well-known sensitivity indices, they do not discuss the relative advantages or disadvantages of their approach compared to these existing measures.
Conclusion
The paper introduces a novel paradigm for global sensitivity analysis that offers a more flexible and systematic way to define and calculate sensitivity indices. By partitioning the inputs and using a factorial experiment design, the method can identify arbitrary user-defined variability measures and interaction effects without the limitations of current approaches.
This research represents an important step forward in sensitivity analysis, providing a new framework that could lead to deeper insights and more robust decision-making in a variety of fields that rely on complex models and simulations.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
⛏️
0
A new paradigm for global sensitivity analysis
Gildas Mazo (MaIAGE)
Current theory of global sensitivity analysis, based on a nonlinear functional ANOVA decomposition of the random output, is limited in scope-for instance, the analysis is limited to the output's variance and the inputs have to be mutually independent-and leads to sensitivity indices the interpretation of which is not fully clear, especially interaction effects. Alternatively, sensitivity indices built for arbitrary user-defined importance measures have been proposed but a theory to define interactions in a systematic fashion and/or establish a decomposition of the total importance measure is still missing. It is shown that these important problems are solved all at once by adopting a new paradigm. By partitioning the inputs into those causing the change in the output and those which do not, arbitrary user-defined variability measures are identified with the outcomes of a factorial experiment at two levels, leading to all factorial effects without assuming any functional decomposition. To link various well-known sensitivity indices of the literature (Sobol indices and Shapley effects), weighted factorial effects are studied and utilized.
Read more9/11/2024
0
Global Sensitivity Analysis of Uncertain Parameters in Bayesian Networks
Rafael Ballester-Ripoll, Manuele Leonelli
Traditionally, the sensitivity analysis of a Bayesian network studies the impact of individually modifying the entries of its conditional probability tables in a one-at-a-time (OAT) fashion. However, this approach fails to give a comprehensive account of each inputs' relevance, since simultaneous perturbations in two or more parameters often entail higher-order effects that cannot be captured by an OAT analysis. We propose to conduct global variance-based sensitivity analysis instead, whereby $n$ parameters are viewed as uncertain at once and their importance is assessed jointly. Our method works by encoding the uncertainties as $n$ additional variables of the network. To prevent the curse of dimensionality while adding these dimensions, we use low-rank tensor decomposition to break down the new potentials into smaller factors. Last, we apply the method of Sobol to the resulting network to obtain $n$ global sensitivity indices. Using a benchmark array of both expert-elicited and learned Bayesian networks, we demonstrate that the Sobol indices can significantly differ from the OAT indices, thus revealing the true influence of uncertain parameters and their interactions.
Read more6/11/2024
0
Enhancing Variable Importance in Random Forests: A Novel Application of Global Sensitivity Analysis
Giulia Vannucci, Roberta Siciliano, Andrea Saltelli
The present work provides an application of Global Sensitivity Analysis to supervised machine learning methods such as Random Forests. These methods act as black boxes, selecting features in high--dimensional data sets as to provide accurate classifiers in terms of prediction when new data are fed into the system. In supervised machine learning, predictors are generally ranked by importance based on their contribution to the final prediction. Global Sensitivity Analysis is primarily used in mathematical modelling to investigate the effect of the uncertainties of the input variables on the output. We apply it here as a novel way to rank the input features by their importance to the explainability of the data generating process, shedding light on how the response is determined by the dependence structure of its predictors. A simulation study shows that our proposal can be used to explore what advances can be achieved either in terms of efficiency, explanatory ability, or simply by way of confirming existing results.
Read more7/22/2024
0
Variance-based sensitivity analysis in the presence of correlated input variables
Thomas Most
In this paper we propose an extension of the classical Sobol' estimator for the estimation of variance based sensitivity indices. The approach assumes a linear correlation model between the input variables which is used to decompose the contribution of an input variable into a correlated and an uncorrelated part. This method provides sampling matrices following the original joint probability distribution which are used directly to compute the model output without any assumptions or approximations of the model response function.
Read more8/12/2024