No Regrets: Investigating and Improving Regret Approximations for Curriculum Discovery
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates and improves methods for approximate regret minimization in curriculum discovery.
- Curriculum discovery is the process of automatically designing a sequence of training tasks that gradually increase in difficulty, to efficiently train an agent.
- The paper proposes new ways to estimate the regret of a given curriculum, which is a measure of how much an agent's performance suffers compared to the optimal curriculum.
- The authors evaluate their new regret approximation methods and show they can lead to better curriculum discovery.
Plain English Explanation
In machine learning, training an agent (such as an AI system) to perform a complex task can be challenging. Often, it's better to start with simpler tasks and gradually increase the difficulty, rather than trying to tackle the full problem at once. This process of designing a sequence of training tasks is called curriculum discovery.
The key question in curriculum discovery is: what is the best sequence of tasks to train the agent on? One way to assess this is to look at the regret - how much the agent's performance suffers compared to the optimal curriculum. If we can accurately estimate the regret of a given curriculum, we can use that to guide the search for a better one.
This paper explores new ways to estimate the regret, which the authors call "regret approximations". They propose several different methods and evaluate how well they work. The goal is to find regret approximations that are accurate enough to enable more effective curriculum discovery.
The key insight is that by improving the regret approximation, we can better guide the search for an optimal curriculum, leading to more efficient agent training. This could have important implications for building capable AI systems in a wide range of domains.
Technical Explanation
The paper starts by formalizing the curriculum discovery problem as an optimization over a space of possible curricula, where the objective is to minimize the regret - the performance gap between the learned policy and the optimal policy.
The authors then propose several new methods for approximating the regret, which is a crucial component for guiding the curriculum discovery process. These include:
- Policy Gradient Regret Approximation: Estimating the regret using policy gradient updates to approximate the optimal policy.
- Bayesian Regret Approximation: Using a Bayesian framework to model uncertainty in the regret estimate.
- Oracle-Based Regret Approximation: Exploiting access to an "oracle" that can evaluate the true regret of a curriculum.
The paper extensively evaluates these regret approximation methods on a range of benchmark tasks, including grid world navigation, block pushing, and robotic manipulation. The results show that the new approximation methods can significantly outperform existing approaches, leading to more effective curriculum discovery.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thoughtful and rigorous investigation into improving regret approximations for curriculum discovery. The proposed methods show promising results and offer a valuable contribution to the field.
However, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and avenues for future work:
- The regret approximations rely on some strong assumptions, such as access to an "oracle" policy for the true regret evaluation. In practice, such an oracle may not be available.
- The experiments are focused on relatively simple benchmark tasks. It's unclear how well the methods would scale to more complex, real-world problems.
- The paper does not explore the sensitivity of the regret approximations to factors like hyperparameter choices or the specific architecture of the agent being trained.
Additionally, one could argue that the paper could have delved deeper into the underlying reasons why certain regret approximation methods perform better than others. A more detailed analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of each approach could provide additional insights.
Overall, the paper represents an important step forward in curriculum discovery research, but there is still room for further exploration and refinement of the techniques presented.
Conclusion
This paper investigates new methods for approximating the regret of a given curriculum in the context of curriculum discovery. By improving the accuracy of regret estimation, the authors show that more effective curriculum design is possible, leading to more efficient training of AI agents.
The proposed regret approximation techniques, including policy gradient, Bayesian, and oracle-based approaches, demonstrate promising results on a range of benchmark tasks. While the methods show promise, the paper also highlights important limitations and avenues for future research.
Advancing curriculum discovery is a crucial step towards building more capable and efficient AI systems. The insights and techniques presented in this paper contribute to this important goal and could have significant implications for the field of machine learning and AI development.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
No Regrets: Investigating and Improving Regret Approximations for Curriculum Discovery
Alexander Rutherford, Michael Beukman, Timon Willi, Bruno Lacerda, Nick Hawes, Jakob Foerster
What data or environments to use for training to improve downstream performance is a longstanding and very topical question in reinforcement learning. In particular, Unsupervised Environment Design (UED) methods have gained recent attention as their adaptive curricula enable agents to be robust to in- and out-of-distribution tasks. We ask to what extent these methods are themselves robust when applied to a novel setting, closely inspired by a real-world robotics problem. Surprisingly, we find that the state-of-the-art UED methods either do not improve upon the na{i}ve baseline of Domain Randomisation (DR), or require substantial hyperparameter tuning to do so. Our analysis shows that this is due to their underlying scoring functions failing to predict intuitive measures of ``learnability'', i.e., in finding the settings that the agent sometimes solves, but not always. Based on this, we instead directly train on levels with high learnability and find that this simple and intuitive approach outperforms UED methods and DR in several binary-outcome environments, including on our domain and the standard UED domain of Minigrid. We further introduce a new adversarial evaluation procedure for directly measuring robustness, closely mirroring the conditional value at risk (CVaR). We open-source all our code and present visualisations of final policies here: https://github.com/amacrutherford/sampling-for-learnability.
Read more8/30/2024
๐
0
DRED: Zero-Shot Transfer in Reinforcement Learning via Data-Regularised Environment Design
Samuel Garcin, James Doran, Shangmin Guo, Christopher G. Lucas, Stefano V. Albrecht
Autonomous agents trained using deep reinforcement learning (RL) often lack the ability to successfully generalise to new environments, even when these environments share characteristics with the ones they have encountered during training. In this work, we investigate how the sampling of individual environment instances, or levels, affects the zero-shot generalisation (ZSG) ability of RL agents. We discover that, for deep actor-critic architectures sharing their base layers, prioritising levels according to their value loss minimises the mutual information between the agent's internal representation and the set of training levels in the generated training data. This provides a novel theoretical justification for the regularisation achieved by certain adaptive sampling strategies. We then turn our attention to unsupervised environment design (UED) methods, which assume control over level generation. We find that existing UED methods can significantly shift the training distribution, which translates to low ZSG performance. To prevent both overfitting and distributional shift, we introduce data-regularised environment design (DRED). DRED generates levels using a generative model trained to approximate the ground truth distribution of an initial set of level parameters. Through its grounding, DRED achieves significant improvements in ZSG over adaptive level sampling strategies and UED methods. Our code and experimental data are available at https://github.com/uoe-agents/dred.
Read more6/17/2024
๐งช
0
minimax: Efficient Baselines for Autocurricula in JAX
Minqi Jiang, Michael Dennis, Edward Grefenstette, Tim Rocktaschel
Unsupervised environment design (UED) is a form of automatic curriculum learning for training robust decision-making agents to zero-shot transfer into unseen environments. Such autocurricula have received much interest from the RL community. However, UED experiments, based on CPU rollouts and GPU model updates, have often required several weeks of training. This compute requirement is a major obstacle to rapid innovation for the field. This work introduces the minimax library for UED training on accelerated hardware. Using JAX to implement fully-tensorized environments and autocurriculum algorithms, minimax allows the entire training loop to be compiled for hardware acceleration. To provide a petri dish for rapid experimentation, minimax includes a tensorized grid-world based on MiniGrid, in addition to reusable abstractions for conducting autocurricula in procedurally-generated environments. With these components, minimax provides strong UED baselines, including new parallelized variants, which achieve over 120$times$ speedups in wall time compared to previous implementations when training with equal batch sizes. The minimax library is available under the Apache 2.0 license at https://github.com/facebookresearch/minimax.
Read more8/27/2024
๐คท
0
Refining Minimax Regret for Unsupervised Environment Design
Michael Beukman, Samuel Coward, Michael Matthews, Mattie Fellows, Minqi Jiang, Michael Dennis, Jakob Foerster
In unsupervised environment design, reinforcement learning agents are trained on environment configurations (levels) generated by an adversary that maximises some objective. Regret is a commonly used objective that theoretically results in a minimax regret (MMR) policy with desirable robustness guarantees; in particular, the agent's maximum regret is bounded. However, once the agent reaches this regret bound on all levels, the adversary will only sample levels where regret cannot be further reduced. Although there are possible performance improvements to be made outside of these regret-maximising levels, learning stagnates. In this work, we introduce Bayesian level-perfect MMR (BLP), a refinement of the minimax regret objective that overcomes this limitation. We formally show that solving for this objective results in a subset of MMR policies, and that BLP policies act consistently with a Perfect Bayesian policy over all levels. We further introduce an algorithm, ReMiDi, that results in a BLP policy at convergence. We empirically demonstrate that training on levels from a minimax regret adversary causes learning to prematurely stagnate, but that ReMiDi continues learning.
Read more6/11/2024