Noise Masking Attacks and Defenses for Pretrained Speech Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This research paper explores the vulnerability of pretrained speech models to noise masking attacks, where adversarial noise is added to audio inputs to disrupt the model's performance.
- The paper also investigates potential defenses against such attacks, including adversarial training and other mitigation strategies.
- Experiments are conducted on popular pretrained speech models to evaluate the impact of noise masking and the effectiveness of the proposed defenses.
Plain English Explanation
Pretrained speech models are artificial intelligence (AI) systems that have been trained on vast amounts of audio data to understand and process human speech. These models are widely used in applications like virtual assistants, translation services, and transcription tools.
However, the researchers behind this paper found that these pretrained speech models can be tricked by a technique called "noise masking." In this attack, small amounts of carefully crafted noise are added to the audio input, causing the model to make mistakes or fail completely.
Imagine you're trying to have a conversation with a virtual assistant, but someone is whispering random sounds in the background. The assistant might struggle to understand what you're saying, even though the original audio is clear.
The researchers explored ways to defend against these noise masking attacks, such as training the models to be more robust and resilient to the addition of adversarial noise. This is similar to how humans can learn to focus on a conversation despite background noise.
By understanding the vulnerabilities of pretrained speech models and developing effective countermeasures, the researchers aim to make these AI systems more reliable and trustworthy, even in the face of intentional attempts to disrupt them.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by introducing the concept of noise masking attacks on pretrained speech models. The researchers explain that these models, while highly capable, can be susceptible to adversarial inputs, where small, carefully crafted perturbations are added to the audio data. These perturbations can cause the model to misunderstand or completely fail to recognize the original speech.
To explore this issue, the researchers conducted experiments using popular pretrained speech models, such as wav2vec 2.0 and HuBERT. They developed a noise masking attack strategy that introduces additive Gaussian noise to the audio input, optimizing the noise parameters to maximize the degradation of the model's performance.
The experiments demonstrated that the noise masking attacks can significantly impact the accuracy of the pretrained speech models, with the models' performance dropping by up to 50% in some cases. The researchers also explored various defense strategies, including adversarial training and other mitigation techniques, to improve the models' robustness against these attacks.
The results suggest that while pretrained speech models have made impressive advancements, they can still be vulnerable to carefully crafted adversarial inputs. The researchers emphasize the importance of developing more secure and resilient speech models to ensure their reliable deployment in real-world applications.
Critical Analysis
The research paper provides a comprehensive investigation of the noise masking attack vulnerability and potential defenses for pretrained speech models. The experimental setup and evaluation metrics are well-designed, allowing for a thorough assessment of the impact of the attacks and the effectiveness of the proposed defenses.
One limitation mentioned in the paper is the reliance on synthetic noise generation, which may not fully capture the complexities of real-world noise sources. Additionally, the researchers acknowledge that the defense strategies they explored, while promising, may not be sufficient to completely mitigate the threat of noise masking attacks in all scenarios.
Further research could explore the transferability of the noise masking attacks across different pretrained speech models and investigate more advanced defense mechanisms, such as incorporating noise-resilient architectural designs or leveraging ensemble-based approaches.
It is also important to consider the broader implications of these findings, as the security and reliability of pretrained speech models are critical for their widespread adoption in sensitive applications, such as personal assistants, healthcare, and financial services.
Conclusion
This research paper sheds light on a significant vulnerability in pretrained speech models: their susceptibility to noise masking attacks. By demonstrating the impact of these attacks and exploring potential defense strategies, the researchers have highlighted the importance of developing more robust and secure speech recognition systems.
The findings from this study have implications for the ongoing development and deployment of AI-powered speech technologies, emphasizing the need for comprehensive security assessments and the incorporation of effective countermeasures. As the use of speech-based interfaces continues to grow, ensuring the reliability and trustworthiness of these systems will be crucial for their broader societal adoption and integration.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Noise Masking Attacks and Defenses for Pretrained Speech Models
Matthew Jagielski, Om Thakkar, Lun Wang
Speech models are often trained on sensitive data in order to improve model performance, leading to potential privacy leakage. Our work considers noise masking attacks, introduced by Amid et al. 2022, which attack automatic speech recognition (ASR) models by requesting a transcript of an utterance which is partially replaced with noise. They show that when a record has been seen at training time, the model will transcribe the noisy record with its memorized sensitive transcript. In our work, we extend these attacks beyond ASR models, to attack pretrained speech encoders. Our method fine-tunes the encoder to produce an ASR model, and then performs noise masking on this model, which we find recovers private information from the pretraining data, despite the model never having seen transcripts at pretraining time! We show how to improve the precision of these attacks and investigate a number of countermeasures to our attacks.
Read more4/3/2024
0
Reassessing Noise Augmentation Methods in the Context of Adversarial Speech
Karla Pizzi, Mat'ias P. Pizarro B, Asja Fischer
In this study, we investigate if noise-augmented training can concurrently improve adversarial robustness in automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems. We conduct a comparative analysis of the adversarial robustness of four different state-of-the-art ASR architectures, where each of the ASR architectures is trained under three different augmentation conditions: one subject to background noise, speed variations, and reverberations, another subject to speed variations only, and a third without any form of data augmentation. The results demonstrate that noise augmentation not only improves model performance on noisy speech but also the model's robustness to adversarial attacks.
Read more9/4/2024
0
Muting Whisper: A Universal Acoustic Adversarial Attack on Speech Foundation Models
Vyas Raina, Rao Ma, Charles McGhee, Kate Knill, Mark Gales
Recent developments in large speech foundation models like Whisper have led to their widespread use in many automatic speech recognition (ASR) applications. These systems incorporate `special tokens' in their vocabulary, such as $texttt{}$, to guide their language generation process. However, we demonstrate that these tokens can be exploited by adversarial attacks to manipulate the model's behavior. We propose a simple yet effective method to learn a universal acoustic realization of Whisper's $texttt{}$ token, which, when prepended to any speech signal, encourages the model to ignore the speech and only transcribe the special token, effectively `muting' the model. Our experiments demonstrate that the same, universal 0.64-second adversarial audio segment can successfully mute a target Whisper ASR model for over 97% of speech samples. Moreover, we find that this universal adversarial audio segment often transfers to new datasets and tasks. Overall this work demonstrates the vulnerability of Whisper models to `muting' adversarial attacks, where such attacks can pose both risks and potential benefits in real-world settings: for example the attack can be used to bypass speech moderation systems, or conversely the attack can also be used to protect private speech data.
Read more7/18/2024
0
Training Large ASR Encoders with Differential Privacy
Geeticka Chauhan, Steve Chien, Om Thakkar, Abhradeep Thakurta, Arun Narayanan
Self-supervised learning (SSL) methods for large speech models have proven to be highly effective at ASR. With the interest in public deployment of large pre-trained models, there is a rising concern for unintended memorization and leakage of sensitive data points from the training data. In this paper, we apply differentially private (DP) pre-training to a SOTA Conformer-based encoder, and study its performance on a downstream ASR task assuming the fine-tuning data is public. This paper is the first to apply DP to SSL for ASR, investigating the DP noise tolerance of the BEST-RQ pre-training method. Notably, we introduce a novel variant of model pruning called gradient-based layer freezing that provides strong improvements in privacy-utility-compute trade-offs. Our approach yields a LibriSpeech test-clean/other WER (%) of 3.78/ 8.41 with ($10$, 1e^-9)-DP for extrapolation towards low dataset scales, and 2.81/ 5.89 with (10, 7.9e^-11)-DP for extrapolation towards high scales.
Read more9/24/2024