Training Large ASR Encoders with Differential Privacy
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores training large automatic speech recognition (ASR) encoders using differential privacy techniques.
- Differential privacy is a method for protecting the privacy of individuals in a dataset by introducing carefully calibrated noise.
- The researchers investigate how to apply differential privacy to the training of large ASR encoder models while maintaining high performance.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on a technique called differential privacy and how it can be used to train large speech recognition models more safely. Differential privacy is a way to protect the privacy of the individuals whose data is used to train the model.
Normally, when you train a machine learning model, the details of the training data (e.g. the exact speech recordings used) can be inferred from the final model. This can be a privacy concern. Differential privacy solves this by adding carefully controlled "noise" or randomness to the training process, so that the final model doesn't reveal too much about any individual's data.
The researchers in this paper looked at how to apply differential privacy techniques to the training of large, powerful speech recognition models. This is challenging because the models are complex and differential privacy can degrade their performance. The key is finding the right balance - adding enough noise to protect privacy, but not so much that the model's accuracy suffers dramatically.
Technical Explanation
The paper explores techniques for training large automatic speech recognition (ASR) encoder models using differential privacy. Differential privacy is a framework for protecting the privacy of individuals in a dataset by introducing carefully calibrated noise into the learning process.
The researchers investigate how to apply differential privacy to the training of large, high-performance ASR encoder models. This is challenging because the models are complex, and the noise introduced by differential privacy can significantly degrade their performance.
The paper makes several technical contributions:
-
Differentially Private Training Procedure: The authors propose a training procedure for large ASR encoders that satisfies differential privacy. This involves carefully clipping the gradients during training and adding noise to the updates.
-
Layerwise Privacy Budgets: Rather than applying the same privacy budget across the entire model, the researchers allocate different privacy budgets to different layers. This allows them to target the most sensitive parts of the model while maintaining performance.
-
Noise-Aware Finetuning: After the initial differentially private training, the authors finetune the model in a noise-aware fashion, further optimizing the model's performance under the privacy constraints.
-
Empirical Evaluation: The paper provides an extensive empirical evaluation of the proposed techniques on large-scale ASR datasets. The results demonstrate that they can train high-performing ASR encoders while providing strong differential privacy guarantees.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a valuable contribution by demonstrating how to train large, high-performance speech recognition models with differential privacy. This is an important problem, as the widespread use of these models can raise significant privacy concerns.
The researchers' techniques for allocating privacy budgets across model layers and performing noise-aware finetuning are novel and show promising results. However, the paper does not explore the broader implications of their approach, such as how it might scale to even larger models or different domains beyond speech recognition.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential limitations or failure modes of their differentially private training procedure. For example, it's unclear how robust the technique is to various types of attacks or whether there are any edge cases where the privacy guarantees may break down.
Overall, this is a solid technical contribution, but further research is needed to fully understand the practical implications and limitations of applying differential privacy to large-scale machine learning models.
Conclusion
This paper presents an important step forward in training large, high-performance speech recognition models with strong differential privacy guarantees. By carefully allocating privacy budgets and performing noise-aware finetuning, the researchers demonstrate that it is possible to train accurate ASR encoders while providing robust privacy protections.
As machine learning models become more ubiquitous and powerful, ensuring the privacy of the individuals whose data is used to train these models will be crucial. The techniques explored in this paper could have significant implications for the responsible development and deployment of large-scale machine learning systems, particularly in sensitive domains like speech recognition.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Training Large ASR Encoders with Differential Privacy
Geeticka Chauhan, Steve Chien, Om Thakkar, Abhradeep Thakurta, Arun Narayanan
Self-supervised learning (SSL) methods for large speech models have proven to be highly effective at ASR. With the interest in public deployment of large pre-trained models, there is a rising concern for unintended memorization and leakage of sensitive data points from the training data. In this paper, we apply differentially private (DP) pre-training to a SOTA Conformer-based encoder, and study its performance on a downstream ASR task assuming the fine-tuning data is public. This paper is the first to apply DP to SSL for ASR, investigating the DP noise tolerance of the BEST-RQ pre-training method. Notably, we introduce a novel variant of model pruning called gradient-based layer freezing that provides strong improvements in privacy-utility-compute trade-offs. Our approach yields a LibriSpeech test-clean/other WER (%) of 3.78/ 8.41 with ($10$, 1e^-9)-DP for extrapolation towards low dataset scales, and 2.81/ 5.89 with (10, 7.9e^-11)-DP for extrapolation towards high scales.
Read more9/24/2024
✅
0
Delving into Differentially Private Transformer
Youlong Ding, Xueyang Wu, Yining Meng, Yonggang Luo, Hao Wang, Weike Pan
Deep learning with differential privacy (DP) has garnered significant attention over the past years, leading to the development of numerous methods aimed at enhancing model accuracy and training efficiency. This paper delves into the problem of training Transformer models with differential privacy. Our treatment is modular: the logic is to `reduce' the problem of training DP Transformer to the more basic problem of training DP vanilla neural nets. The latter is better understood and amenable to many model-agnostic methods. Such `reduction' is done by first identifying the hardness unique to DP Transformer training: the attention distraction phenomenon and a lack of compatibility with existing techniques for efficient gradient clipping. To deal with these two issues, we propose the Re-Attention Mechanism and Phantom Clipping, respectively. We believe that our work not only casts new light on training DP Transformers but also promotes a modular treatment to advance research in the field of differentially private deep learning.
Read more8/27/2024
🔄
0
Beyond the Mean: Differentially Private Prototypes for Private Transfer Learning
Dariush Wahdany, Matthew Jagielski, Adam Dziedzic, Franziska Boenisch
Machine learning (ML) models have been shown to leak private information from their training datasets. Differential Privacy (DP), typically implemented through the differential private stochastic gradient descent algorithm (DP-SGD), has become the standard solution to bound leakage from the models. Despite recent improvements, DP-SGD-based approaches for private learning still usually struggle in the high privacy ($varepsilonle1)$ and low data regimes, and when the private training datasets are imbalanced. To overcome these limitations, we propose Differentially Private Prototype Learning (DPPL) as a new paradigm for private transfer learning. DPPL leverages publicly pre-trained encoders to extract features from private data and generates DP prototypes that represent each private class in the embedding space and can be publicly released for inference. Since our DP prototypes can be obtained from only a few private training data points and without iterative noise addition, they offer high-utility predictions and strong privacy guarantees even under the notion of pure DP. We additionally show that privacy-utility trade-offs can be further improved when leveraging the public data beyond pre-training of the encoder: in particular, we can privately sample our DP prototypes from the publicly available data points used to train the encoder. Our experimental evaluation with four state-of-the-art encoders, four vision datasets, and under different data and imbalancedness regimes demonstrate DPPL's high performance under strong privacy guarantees in challenging private learning setups.
Read more6/13/2024
0
Noise-Aware Differentially Private Regression via Meta-Learning
Ossi Raisa, Stratis Markou, Matthew Ashman, Wessel P. Bruinsma, Marlon Tobaben, Antti Honkela, Richard E. Turner
Many high-stakes applications require machine learning models that protect user privacy and provide well-calibrated, accurate predictions. While Differential Privacy (DP) is the gold standard for protecting user privacy, standard DP mechanisms typically significantly impair performance. One approach to mitigating this issue is pre-training models on simulated data before DP learning on the private data. In this work we go a step further, using simulated data to train a meta-learning model that combines the Convolutional Conditional Neural Process (ConvCNP) with an improved functional DP mechanism of Hall et al. [2013] yielding the DPConvCNP. DPConvCNP learns from simulated data how to map private data to a DP predictive model in one forward pass, and then provides accurate, well-calibrated predictions. We compare DPConvCNP with a DP Gaussian Process (GP) baseline with carefully tuned hyperparameters. The DPConvCNP outperforms the GP baseline, especially on non-Gaussian data, yet is much faster at test time and requires less tuning.
Read more6/14/2024