Non-Asymptotic Uncertainty Quantification in High-Dimensional Learning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores non-asymptotic uncertainty quantification in high-dimensional machine learning models.
- It focuses on developing tight, non-asymptotic error bounds for the uncertainty estimates of high-dimensional predictive models.
- The authors propose a general framework for non-asymptotic uncertainty quantification that can be applied to a variety of high-dimensional learning tasks.
Plain English Explanation
Machine learning models are often used to make predictions, but it's important to understand how certain or uncertain those predictions are. This paper looks at ways to quantify the uncertainty in predictions made by complex, high-dimensional machine learning models.
The key idea is to develop mathematical bounds on the error or uncertainty in the model's predictions, without making assumptions that only hold true as the amount of data gets infinitely large. This is important because real-world datasets are always finite in size.
The authors propose a general framework that can be applied to many different types of high-dimensional learning problems, like online prediction, multivariable regression, and uncertainty quantification for pre-trained neural networks. By providing tight, non-asymptotic error bounds, this work can help practitioners understand the reliability of their high-dimensional machine learning models, even with limited data.
Technical Explanation
The paper develops a general framework for non-asymptotic uncertainty quantification in high-dimensional learning problems. The key technical contributions are:
-
Non-Asymptotic Error Bounds: The authors derive non-asymptotic error bounds for uncertainty estimates produced by high-dimensional learning models. These bounds hold for finite sample sizes, without relying on asymptotic assumptions.
-
Generality: The proposed framework can be applied to a variety of high-dimensional learning tasks, including online prediction, multivariable regression, and uncertainty quantification for pre-trained neural networks.
-
Tightness: The error bounds derived in this work are shown to be tight, meaning they closely match the actual uncertainty in the model's predictions.
The technical analysis involves advanced tools from high-dimensional probability, including Gaussian processes, Rademacher complexity, and self-concordant barrier functions. These are used to derive non-asymptotic error bounds that quantify the reliability of the model's uncertainty estimates, even in settings with limited data.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a strong theoretical foundation for non-asymptotic uncertainty quantification in high-dimensional learning. However, some potential limitations and areas for further research are:
-
Practical Considerations: While the theoretical framework is general, applying it to specific high-dimensional learning problems may require additional technical work and domain expertise. More research is needed on how to efficiently implement these methods in practice.
-
Empirical Validation: The paper focuses primarily on the theoretical analysis and does not include extensive empirical evaluations. Further research is needed to validate the performance of the proposed methods on real-world high-dimensional datasets.
-
Model Assumptions: The analysis relies on certain assumptions about the high-dimensional learning problem, such as the existence of a sparse or low-rank structure. These assumptions may not hold in all practical scenarios, and the robustness of the methods to model misspecification should be investigated.
Overall, this work provides a strong theoretical foundation for non-asymptotic uncertainty quantification in high-dimensional learning, which is an important problem with many practical applications. Further research is needed to bridge the gap between the theoretical insights and effective deployment of these techniques in real-world machine learning systems.
Conclusion
This paper presents a general framework for non-asymptotic uncertainty quantification in high-dimensional learning. By deriving tight, non-asymptotic error bounds, the authors have made an important contribution to the field of uncertainty quantification for complex, data-driven models.
The proposed methods can be applied to a variety of high-dimensional learning tasks, including online prediction, multivariable regression, and uncertainty quantification for pre-trained neural networks. This work helps practitioners better understand the reliability of their high-dimensional models, even with limited data, which is crucial for making informed decisions in many real-world applications.
While further research is needed to address practical considerations and empirically validate the methods, this paper represents a significant step forward in the field of non-asymptotic uncertainty quantification for high-dimensional machine learning.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Non-Asymptotic Uncertainty Quantification in High-Dimensional Learning
Frederik Hoppe, Claudio Mayrink Verdun, Hannah Laus, Felix Krahmer, Holger Rauhut
Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is a crucial but challenging task in many high-dimensional regression or learning problems to increase the confidence of a given predictor. We develop a new data-driven approach for UQ in regression that applies both to classical regression approaches such as the LASSO as well as to neural networks. One of the most notable UQ techniques is the debiased LASSO, which modifies the LASSO to allow for the construction of asymptotic confidence intervals by decomposing the estimation error into a Gaussian and an asymptotically vanishing bias component. However, in real-world problems with finite-dimensional data, the bias term is often too significant to be neglected, resulting in overly narrow confidence intervals. Our work rigorously addresses this issue and derives a data-driven adjustment that corrects the confidence intervals for a large class of predictors by estimating the means and variances of the bias terms from training data, exploiting high-dimensional concentration phenomena. This gives rise to non-asymptotic confidence intervals, which can help avoid overestimating uncertainty in critical applications such as MRI diagnosis. Importantly, our analysis extends beyond sparse regression to data-driven predictors like neural networks, enhancing the reliability of model-based deep learning. Our findings bridge the gap between established theory and the practical applicability of such debiased methods.
Read more7/19/2024
🤿
0
A Comprehensive Survey on Uncertainty Quantification for Deep Learning
Wenchong He, Zhe Jiang, Tingsong Xiao, Zelin Xu, Yukun Li
Deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved tremendous success in making accurate predictions for computer vision, natural language processing, as well as science and engineering domains. However, it is also well-recognized that DNNs sometimes make unexpected, incorrect, but overconfident predictions. This can cause serious consequences in high-stake applications, such as autonomous driving, medical diagnosis, and disaster response. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) aims to estimate the confidence of DNN predictions beyond prediction accuracy. In recent years, many UQ methods have been developed for DNNs. It is of great practical value to systematically categorize these UQ methods and compare their advantages and disadvantages. However, existing surveys mostly focus on categorizing UQ methodologies from a neural network architecture perspective or a Bayesian perspective and ignore the source of uncertainty that each methodology can incorporate, making it difficult to select an appropriate UQ method in practice. To fill the gap, this paper presents a systematic taxonomy of UQ methods for DNNs based on the types of uncertainty sources (data uncertainty versus model uncertainty). We summarize the advantages and disadvantages of methods in each category. We show how our taxonomy of UQ methodologies can potentially help guide the choice of UQ method in different machine learning problems (e.g., active learning, robustness, and reinforcement learning). We also identify current research gaps and propose several future research directions.
Read more7/16/2024
0
Online Algorithms with Uncertainty-Quantified Predictions
Bo Sun, Jerry Huang, Nicolas Christianson, Mohammad Hajiesmaili, Adam Wierman, Raouf Boutaba
The burgeoning field of algorithms with predictions studies the problem of using possibly imperfect machine learning predictions to improve online algorithm performance. While nearly all existing algorithms in this framework make no assumptions on prediction quality, a number of methods providing uncertainty quantification (UQ) on machine learning models have been developed in recent years, which could enable additional information about prediction quality at decision time. In this work, we investigate the problem of optimally utilizing uncertainty-quantified predictions in the design of online algorithms. In particular, we study two classic online problems, ski rental and online search, where the decision-maker is provided predictions augmented with UQ describing the likelihood of the ground truth falling within a particular range of values. We demonstrate that non-trivial modifications to algorithm design are needed to fully leverage the UQ predictions. Moreover, we consider how to utilize more general forms of UQ, proposing an online learning framework that learns to exploit UQ to make decisions in multi-instance settings.
Read more6/5/2024
↗️
0
Uncertainty Quantification in Multivariable Regression for Material Property Prediction with Bayesian Neural Networks
Longze Li, Jiang Chang, Aleksandar Vakanski, Yachun Wang, Tiankai Yao, Min Xian
With the increased use of data-driven approaches and machine learning-based methods in material science, the importance of reliable uncertainty quantification (UQ) of the predicted variables for informed decision-making cannot be overstated. UQ in material property prediction poses unique challenges, including the multi-scale and multi-physics nature of advanced materials, intricate interactions between numerous factors, limited availability of large curated datasets for model training, etc. Recently, Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs) have emerged as a promising approach for UQ, offering a probabilistic framework for capturing uncertainties within neural networks. In this work, we introduce an approach for UQ within physics-informed BNNs, which integrates knowledge from governing laws in material modeling to guide the models toward physically consistent predictions. To evaluate the effectiveness of this approach, we present case studies for predicting the creep rupture life of steel alloys. Experimental validation with three datasets of collected measurements from creep tests demonstrates the ability of BNNs to produce accurate point and uncertainty estimates that are competitive or exceed the performance of the conventional method of Gaussian Process Regression. Similarly, we evaluated the suitability of BNNs for UQ in an active learning application and reported competitive performance. The most promising framework for creep life prediction is BNNs based on Markov Chain Monte Carlo approximation of the posterior distribution of network parameters, as it provided more reliable results in comparison to BNNs based on variational inference approximation or related NNs with probabilistic outputs. The codes are available at: https://github.com/avakanski/Creep-uncertainty-quantification.
Read more5/15/2024