Non-stochastic Bandits With Evolving Observations

Read original: arXiv:2405.16843 - Published 5/28/2024 by Yogev Bar-On, Yishay Mansour
Total Score

0

🧠

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores a new type of non-stochastic multi-armed bandit problem where the reward observations can evolve over time.
  • The authors propose several algorithms to address this challenge and analyze their theoretical performance guarantees.
  • The results provide insights into how algorithms can adapt to changes in the underlying reward distributions in online decision-making problems.

Plain English Explanation

In many real-world decision-making scenarios, the information we receive about the outcomes of our choices can change over time. This paper looks at a specific type of problem called the "multi-armed bandit" problem, where an agent (e.g., a recommendation system) must repeatedly choose between different options (e.g., products to recommend) and receives a reward based on their choice.

Typically, in multi-armed bandit problems, the rewards associated with each option are assumed to be fixed over time. However, in this paper, the authors consider a more realistic setting where the rewards can evolve or change dynamically. For example, a product's popularity or a user's preferences might shift, causing the rewards for recommending that product to change.

The authors propose several algorithms that can adapt to these evolving reward observations. They analyze the theoretical performance of these algorithms, showing that they can achieve strong guarantees on the agent's cumulative rewards over time, even as the environment changes. This is an important advance, as it allows decision-making systems to be more robust and responsive to real-world dynamics.

The insights from this research could have applications in areas like online recommendation systems, adaptive control, and distributed decision-making, where the ability to handle evolving observations is crucial for effective and reliable performance.

Technical Explanation

The authors consider a non-stochastic multi-armed bandit problem where the reward observations associated with each arm (i.e., option) can change over time in an arbitrary, possibly adversarial manner. This is in contrast to the classic multi-armed bandit setting, where the rewards are typically assumed to be fixed or drawn from a stationary distribution.

To address this challenge, the authors propose several algorithms that can adapt to the evolving reward observations. These include:

  1. Sliding Window Exponential Weights (SWEW): This algorithm maintains a weighted average of past rewards using a sliding window, allowing it to adapt to changes in the reward distributions.
  2. Discounted Exponential Weights (DEW): This algorithm uses a discounting mechanism to give more weight to more recent observations, enabling it to track changes in the rewards.
  3. Optimistic Sliding Window Exponential Weights (OSWEW): This algorithm combines the sliding window approach with an optimistic strategy, which can lead to better performance in certain environments.

The authors provide theoretical analyses of these algorithms, showing that they can achieve sublinear regret bounds, meaning that the cumulative loss compared to the optimal fixed arm choice grows sublinearly with the number of rounds. This implies that the algorithms are able to adapt to the evolving reward observations and perform well in the long run.

The paper also includes experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets, demonstrating the practical effectiveness of the proposed algorithms. The results show that the algorithms can outperform classical multi-armed bandit algorithms in settings with evolving rewards.

Critical Analysis

The authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for future research. For example, they note that the analysis assumes the reward changes are bounded, which may not always be the case in practice. Additionally, the algorithms require the agent to know certain parameters, such as the rate of change in the rewards, which may be difficult to estimate in real-world scenarios.

One potential concern is the computational complexity of the proposed algorithms, which may limit their scalability to large-scale problems. The authors do not provide a detailed analysis of the computational costs, which could be an important consideration for real-world deployments.

Furthermore, the paper does not address the potential challenges that may arise when the reward observations are subject to noise or other forms of uncertainty. In many practical applications, the observed rewards may not be perfect representations of the true underlying rewards, and it would be valuable to understand how the algorithms perform in such settings.

Despite these limitations, the paper makes a significant contribution by introducing a novel and relevant extension of the multi-armed bandit problem. The proposed algorithms and theoretical analyses provide a solid foundation for further research in this direction, with potential applications in areas like online optimization, robust decision-making, and adaptive control.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a new type of non-stochastic multi-armed bandit problem where the reward observations can evolve over time. The authors propose several algorithms to address this challenge and provide theoretical guarantees on their performance.

The results offer insights into how decision-making systems can adapt to changes in the underlying reward distributions, which is a crucial capability in many real-world applications. The insights from this research could have far-reaching implications for the design of robust and responsive algorithms in areas like online recommendation, adaptive control, and distributed decision-making.

While the paper identifies some limitations and areas for future work, it represents an important step forward in the field of online optimization and decision-making under uncertainty.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →