The NP-hardness of the Gromov-Wasserstein distance
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The provided paper discusses the NP-hardness of the Gromov-Wasserstein (GW) distance, a concept frequently mentioned in the literature.
- The paper provides details on the non-convex nature of the GW optimization problem, which implies the NP-hardness of the GW distance between finite sets.
Plain English Explanation
The Gromov-Wasserstein distance is a way to measure the similarity between two sets of data, even if the data is structured differently. This distance is commonly used in machine learning and data analysis. However, the paper reveals that calculating this distance is a computationally complex problem, known as "NP-hard."
NP-hard problems are extremely challenging to solve, as the time required to find a solution grows exponentially with the size of the problem. This means that as the datasets get larger, the time needed to calculate the Gromov-Wasserstein distance becomes impractically long, even for powerful computers.
The paper explains that the reason the GW distance is NP-hard is due to the non-convex nature of the underlying optimization problem. Non-convex problems are inherently difficult to solve because they can have multiple local minima, making it hard to find the global optimal solution.
By understanding the complexity of the GW distance, researchers can better appreciate the challenges in working with this metric and explore alternative approaches that may be more computationally tractable for real-world applications, such as Gromov-Wasserstein-like distances for Gaussian mixture models or partial Gromov-Wasserstein metric.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a formal proof that the Gromov-Wasserstein (GW) distance between finite sets is an NP-hard problem. The GW distance is a way to measure the similarity between two datasets by considering the underlying structure or geometry of the data, rather than just the individual data points.
The key insight is that the GW distance optimization problem is non-convex, meaning it can have multiple local minima. This non-convexity is what makes the problem computationally hard to solve, as finding the global optimal solution becomes extremely challenging, especially as the size of the datasets increases.
The authors provide a reduction from the well-known NP-hard problem of graph matching to the GW distance computation, which establishes the NP-hardness of the GW distance. This reduction demonstrates that if one could efficiently solve the GW distance problem, then one could also efficiently solve the graph matching problem, which is known to be NP-hard.
This result has important implications for the practical use of the GW distance, as it suggests that finding the exact GW distance between large datasets may not be feasible in reasonable time. Researchers may need to explore alternative approaches, such as approximation algorithms or regularized versions of the GW distance, to make the GW distance more computationally tractable for real-world applications.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a solid theoretical foundation for understanding the computational complexity of the Gromov-Wasserstein distance. The authors' proof of NP-hardness is rigorous and convincing, highlighting the inherent challenges in efficiently computing this distance, especially for large-scale datasets.
One potential limitation of the study is that it focuses solely on the finite set case, leaving open the question of the complexity of the GW distance for continuous measures. While the finite set case is an important starting point, exploring the complexity of the continuous GW distance could provide further insights and practical implications.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into potential strategies or approximation algorithms that could be used to overcome the NP-hardness of the GW distance. Investigating such approaches, as mentioned in the related work, could be a valuable direction for future research to make the GW distance more accessible for real-world applications.
Overall, this paper makes a significant contribution to the understanding of the Gromov-Wasserstein distance and its computational complexity. By highlighting the NP-hardness of the problem, it encourages researchers to critically examine the use of the GW distance and explore alternative methods that may be more computationally tractable.
Conclusion
The provided paper demonstrates that the Gromov-Wasserstein (GW) distance between finite sets is an NP-hard problem, meaning it is computationally complex and challenging to solve efficiently, especially for large datasets. This result is important for researchers and practitioners working with the GW distance, as it highlights the inherent limitations and the need to explore alternative approaches, such as approximation algorithms or regularized versions of the GW distance, to make it more practical for real-world applications.
By understanding the complexity of the GW distance, the research community can better appreciate the challenges involved and work towards developing more efficient and scalable methods for measuring the similarity between structured data, ultimately advancing the field of machine learning and data analysis.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
The NP-hardness of the Gromov-Wasserstein distance
Natalia Kravtsova
This note addresses the property frequently mentioned in the literature that the Gromov-Wasserstein (GW) distance is NP-hard. We provide the details on the non-convex nature of the GW optimization problem that imply NP-hardness of the GW distance between finite spaces for any instance of an input data. We further illustrate the non-convexity of the problem with several explicit examples.
Read more8/14/2024
0
Fast Gradient Computation for Gromov-Wasserstein Distance
Wei Zhang, Zihao Wang, Jie Fan, Hao Wu, Yong Zhang
The Gromov-Wasserstein distance is a notable extension of optimal transport. In contrast to the classic Wasserstein distance, it solves a quadratic assignment problem that minimizes the pair-wise distance distortion under the transportation of distributions and thus could apply to distributions in different spaces. These properties make Gromov-Wasserstein widely applicable to many fields, such as computer graphics and machine learning. However, the computation of the Gromov-Wasserstein distance and transport plan is expensive. The well-known Entropic Gromov-Wasserstein approach has a cubic complexity since the matrix multiplication operations need to be repeated in computing the gradient of Gromov-Wasserstein loss. This becomes a key bottleneck of the method. Currently, existing methods accelerate the computation focus on sampling and approximation, which leads to low accuracy or incomplete transport plan. In this work, we propose a novel method to accelerate accurate gradient computation by dynamic programming techniques, reducing the complexity from cubic to quadratic. In this way, the original computational bottleneck is broken and the new entropic solution can be obtained with total quadratic time, which is almost optimal complexity. Furthermore, it can be extended to some variants easily. Extensive experiments validate the efficiency and effectiveness of our method.
Read more4/16/2024
0
The Z-Gromov-Wasserstein Distance
Martin Bauer, Facundo M'emoli, Tom Needham, Mao Nishino
The Gromov-Wasserstein (GW) distance is a powerful tool for comparing metric measure spaces which has found broad applications in data science and machine learning. Driven by the need to analyze datasets whose objects have increasingly complex structure (such as node and edge-attributed graphs), several variants of GW distance have been introduced in the recent literature. With a view toward establishing a general framework for the theory of GW-like distances, this paper considers a vast generalization of the notion of a metric measure space: for an arbitrary metric space $Z$, we define a $Z$-network to be a measure space endowed with a kernel valued in $Z$. We introduce a method for comparing $Z$-networks by defining a generalization of GW distance, which we refer to as $Z$-Gromov-Wasserstein ($Z$-GW) distance. This construction subsumes many previously known metrics and offers a unified approach to understanding their shared properties. The paper demonstrates that the $Z$-GW distance defines a metric on the space of $Z$-networks which retains desirable properties of $Z$, such as separability, completeness, and geodesicity. Many of these properties were unknown for existing variants of GW distance that fall under our framework. Our focus is on foundational theory, but our results also include computable lower bounds and approximations of the distance which will be useful for practical applications.
Read more8/16/2024
🤷
0
Gromov-Wassertein-like Distances in the Gaussian Mixture Models Space
Antoine Salmona, Julie Delon, Agn`es Desolneux
The Gromov-Wasserstein (GW) distance is frequently used in machine learning to compare distributions across distinct metric spaces. Despite its utility, it remains computationally intensive, especially for large-scale problems. Recently, a novel Wasserstein distance specifically tailored for Gaussian mixture models and known as MW (mixture Wasserstein) has been introduced by several authors. In scenarios where data exhibit clustering, this approach simplifies to a small-scale discrete optimal transport problem, which complexity depends solely on the number of Gaussian components in the GMMs. This paper aims to extend MW by introducing new Gromov-type distances. These distances are designed to be isometry-invariant in Euclidean spaces and are applicable for comparing GMMs across different dimensional spaces. Our first contribution is the Mixture Gromov Wasserstein distance (MGW), which can be viewed as a Gromovized version of MW. This new distance has a straightforward discrete formulation, making it highly efficient for estimating distances between GMMs in practical applications. To facilitate the derivation of a transport plan between GMMs, we present a second distance, the Embedded Wasserstein distance (EW). This distance turns out to be closely related to several recent alternatives to Gromov-Wasserstein. We show that EW can be adapted to derive a distance as well as optimal transportation plans between GMMs. We demonstrate the efficiency of these newly proposed distances on medium to large-scale problems, including shape matching and hyperspectral image color transfer.
Read more4/1/2024