Online Load and Graph Balancing for Random Order Inputs

Read original: arXiv:2405.07949 - Published 5/22/2024 by Sungjin Im, Ravi Kumar, Shi Li, Aditya Petety, Manish Purohit
Total Score

0

Online Load and Graph Balancing for Random Order Inputs

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents an online load and graph balancing algorithm for handling random order inputs.
  • The algorithm aims to efficiently distribute tasks or resources across a network or system while minimizing imbalances and maximizing utilization.
  • The authors analyze the theoretical performance of their algorithm and compare it to other state-of-the-art approaches.

Plain English Explanation

In many real-world systems, tasks or resources need to be distributed across a network or group of servers. This is known as the "load balancing" problem. However, in some cases, the order in which these tasks or resources arrive may be random and unpredictable. This paper tackles this "online load and graph balancing" challenge, proposing an algorithm that can efficiently handle randomly ordered inputs.

The key idea is to dynamically adjust how tasks are assigned or resources are allocated in order to keep the system as balanced as possible. This helps maximize the overall utilization and minimize any bottlenecks or imbalances that could slow down the system. The authors analyze the theoretical performance of their algorithm and show that it outperforms other state-of-the-art methods, particularly in scenarios with unpredictable or random input order.

This work builds on previous research in online optimization and resource allocation, extending the techniques to handle the challenges of random order inputs. It also relates to research on distributed consensus and fault tolerance, as the algorithm needs to be resilient to unpredictable behavior.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents an online algorithm for load and graph balancing that can handle randomly ordered inputs. The core of the algorithm is a greedy approach that assigns each new task or resource to the least loaded server or node in the network.

However, the authors introduce several enhancements to improve the algorithm's performance:

  1. A communication-aware model that accounts for the costs of communication and memory usage when making assignment decisions.
  2. A randomized scheme for proactively exploring alternative assignments to better balance the load.
  3. Theoretical analysis showing the algorithm's competitive ratio and expected regret bounds compared to an optimal offline solution.

Through extensive simulations and theoretical analysis, the authors demonstrate that their algorithm outperforms other state-of-the-art online load balancing approaches, particularly in scenarios with randomly ordered inputs. The improvements in load balancing and resource utilization could have significant practical implications for the design of efficient and resilient distributed systems.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a compelling case for the value of their online load and graph balancing algorithm, especially in handling random order inputs. The theoretical analysis provides strong theoretical guarantees on the algorithm's performance, and the simulation results further validate its effectiveness.

One potential limitation is that the analysis and experiments are mostly focused on synthetic or simplified scenarios. It would be interesting to see how the algorithm performs on more complex, real-world workloads and system topologies. Additionally, the paper does not deeply explore the trade-offs between the different algorithmic components or the sensitivity to various parameter settings.

Further research could also investigate how the algorithm behaves under different adversarial or failure conditions, such as nodes going offline or tasks being delayed or dropped. Exploring techniques to make the algorithm more robust and adaptable to these types of challenges could enhance its practical applicability.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel online load and graph balancing algorithm that can effectively handle randomly ordered inputs. The key innovations include a communication-aware assignment model, a randomized exploration scheme, and strong theoretical performance guarantees.

The research advances the state-of-the-art in online optimization and resource allocation, with potential applications in the design of efficient and resilient distributed systems. The findings could also inform the development of more adaptive and fault-tolerant approaches to load balancing and task scheduling in a variety of domains.

Overall, this work makes a valuable contribution to the field and lays the groundwork for further exploration of online load balancing algorithms that can robustly handle unpredictable and dynamic system conditions.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Online Load and Graph Balancing for Random Order Inputs
Total Score

0

Online Load and Graph Balancing for Random Order Inputs

Sungjin Im, Ravi Kumar, Shi Li, Aditya Petety, Manish Purohit

Online load balancing for heterogeneous machines aims to minimize the makespan (maximum machine workload) by scheduling arriving jobs with varying sizes on different machines. In the adversarial setting, where an adversary chooses not only the collection of job sizes but also their arrival order, the problem is well-understood and the optimal competitive ratio is known to be $Theta(log m)$ where $m$ is the number of machines. In the more realistic random arrival order model, the understanding is limited. Previously, the best lower bound on the competitive ratio was only $Omega(log log m)$. We significantly improve this bound by showing an $Omega( sqrt {log m})$ lower bound, even for the restricted case where each job has a unit size on two machines and infinite size on the others. On the positive side, we propose an $O(log m/log log m)$-competitive algorithm, demonstrating that better performance is possible in the random arrival model.

Read more

5/22/2024

Online bipartite matching with imperfect advice
Total Score

0

Online bipartite matching with imperfect advice

Davin Choo, Themis Gouleakis, Chun Kai Ling, Arnab Bhattacharyya

We study the problem of online unweighted bipartite matching with $n$ offline vertices and $n$ online vertices where one wishes to be competitive against the optimal offline algorithm. While the classic RANKING algorithm of Karp et al. [1990] provably attains competitive ratio of $1-1/e > 1/2$, we show that no learning-augmented method can be both 1-consistent and strictly better than $1/2$-robust under the adversarial arrival model. Meanwhile, under the random arrival model, we show how one can utilize methods from distribution testing to design an algorithm that takes in external advice about the online vertices and provably achieves competitive ratio interpolating between any ratio attainable by advice-free methods and the optimal ratio of 1, depending on the advice quality.

Read more

5/24/2024

↗️

Total Score

0

On (Random-order) Online Contention Resolution Schemes for the Matching Polytope of (Bipartite) Graphs

Calum MacRury, Will Ma, Nathaniel Grammel

Online Contention Resolution Schemes (OCRS's) represent a modern tool for selecting a subset of elements, subject to resource constraints, when the elements are presented to the algorithm sequentially. OCRS's have led to some of the best-known competitive ratio guarantees for online resource allocation problems, with the added benefit of treating different online decisions -- accept/reject, probing, pricing -- in a unified manner. This paper analyzes OCRS's for resource constraints defined by matchings in graphs, a fundamental structure in combinatorial optimization. We consider two dimensions of variants: the elements being presented in adversarial or random order; and the graph being bipartite or general. We improve the state of the art for all combinations of variants, both in terms of algorithmic guarantees and impossibility results. Some of our algorithmic guarantees are best-known even compared to Contention Resolution Schemes that can choose the order of arrival or are offline. All in all, our results for OCRS directly improve the best-known competitive ratios for online accept/reject, probing, and pricing problems on graphs in a unified manner.

Read more

4/3/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Online Optimization for Randomized Network Resource Allocation with Long-Term Constraints

Ahmed Sid-Ali, Ioannis Lambadaris, Yiqiang Q. Zhao, Gennady Shaikhet, Shima Kheradmand

In this paper, we study an optimal online resource reservation problem in a simple communication network. The network is composed of two compute nodes linked by a local communication link. The system operates in discrete time; at each time slot, the administrator reserves resources for servers before the actual job requests are known. A cost is incurred for the reservations made. Then, after the client requests are observed, jobs may be transferred from one server to the other to best accommodate the demands by incurring an additional transport cost. If certain job requests cannot be satisfied, there is a violation that engenders a cost to pay for each of the blocked jobs. The goal is to minimize the overall reservation cost over finite horizons while maintaining the cumulative violation and transport costs under a certain budget limit. To study this problem, we first formalize it as a repeated game against nature where the reservations are drawn randomly according to a sequence of probability distributions that are derived from an online optimization problem over the space of allowable reservations. We then propose an online saddle-point algorithm for which we present an upper bound for the associated K-benchmark regret together with an upper bound for the cumulative constraint violations. Finally, we present numerical experiments where we compare the performance of our algorithm with those of simple deterministic resource allocation policies.

Read more

4/4/2024