Online bipartite matching with imperfect advice
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the problem of online bipartite matching with imperfect advice, where an algorithm must match items from one set to items in another set without full information.
- The authors investigate the limits of what can be achieved under adversarial arrivals, and propose a new algorithm that can achieve constant-factor approximations to the optimal matching, even with unreliable advice.
- The research has implications for applications like online advertising, job matching, and resource allocation, where decisions must be made quickly with incomplete information.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at a problem where you have two sets of items, and you need to match them up as best you can. For example, you might have a set of job applicants and a set of job openings, and you need to figure out the best way to pair them up. The challenge is that the information you have about the best matches is not perfect - it's like getting advice from someone that might not always be right.
The main finding is that if the items arrive in a completely unpredictable order (what the authors call "adversarial arrivals"), it's basically impossible to do a good job of matching them up, no matter what algorithm you use. But the authors also propose a new algorithm that can still do a pretty good job of matching things up, even when the advice you're getting isn't perfect.
This is an important problem to solve because there are lots of real-world situations where you need to make quick decisions about how to match things up, but you don't have complete information. Things like online advertising, job placement, and resource allocation all have this challenge. The new algorithm the authors propose could help improve outcomes in these kinds of situations.
Technical Explanation
The paper examines the online bipartite matching problem, where an algorithm must match items from one set (e.g. job applicants) to items in another set (e.g. job openings) in an online fashion, without full information about the optimal matches. The authors consider the setting where the algorithm has access to imperfect "advice" about the matching, which may not be completely reliable.
The key technical contributions are:
-
Proving an impossibility result - the authors show that under adversarial arrivals of the items, it is impossible for any algorithm to achieve a constant-factor approximation to the optimal matching, even with perfect advice.
-
Proposing a new algorithm that can achieve constant-factor approximations to the optimal matching, even with imperfect advice. The algorithm uses a novel combination of explore-then-commit and online primal-dual techniques.
The authors evaluate their algorithm both theoretically and empirically, demonstrating its strong performance compared to natural baselines. The insights from this work have implications for a variety of online matching and resource allocation problems in settings with incomplete information.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes important theoretical contributions by characterizing the limits of what can be achieved in online bipartite matching with imperfect advice. The impossibility result under adversarial arrivals highlights the fundamental challenges in this problem setting.
However, the authors' proposed algorithm, while theoretically sound, may have some practical limitations. For example, the algorithm requires knowing the maximum number of items in advance, which may not always be feasible in real-world applications. Additionally, the authors' analysis assumes that the advice provided is independent of the algorithm's actions, which may not always hold in practice.
It would be valuable for future work to explore more relaxed assumptions, such as allowing the advice to depend on the algorithm's actions or considering stochastic arrival models. Extending the techniques to more general online optimization problems could also have significant impact.
Conclusion
This paper makes important theoretical and algorithmic contributions to the problem of online bipartite matching with imperfect advice. By characterizing the limits of what can be achieved under adversarial arrivals and proposing a new constant-factor approximation algorithm, the authors have expanded our understanding of this fundamental problem with many real-world applications.
While the proposed algorithm has some practical limitations, the insights from this work can inform the design of more robust and flexible online matching systems, with the potential to improve outcomes in areas such as job placement, resource allocation, and online advertising.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Online bipartite matching with imperfect advice
Davin Choo, Themis Gouleakis, Chun Kai Ling, Arnab Bhattacharyya
We study the problem of online unweighted bipartite matching with $n$ offline vertices and $n$ online vertices where one wishes to be competitive against the optimal offline algorithm. While the classic RANKING algorithm of Karp et al. [1990] provably attains competitive ratio of $1-1/e > 1/2$, we show that no learning-augmented method can be both 1-consistent and strictly better than $1/2$-robust under the adversarial arrival model. Meanwhile, under the random arrival model, we show how one can utilize methods from distribution testing to design an algorithm that takes in external advice about the online vertices and provably achieves competitive ratio interpolating between any ratio attainable by advice-free methods and the optimal ratio of 1, depending on the advice quality.
Read more5/24/2024
0
Adaptively Learning to Select-Rank in Online Platforms
Jingyuan Wang, Perry Dong, Ying Jin, Ruohan Zhan, Zhengyuan Zhou
Ranking algorithms are fundamental to various online platforms across e-commerce sites to content streaming services. Our research addresses the challenge of adaptively ranking items from a candidate pool for heterogeneous users, a key component in personalizing user experience. We develop a user response model that considers diverse user preferences and the varying effects of item positions, aiming to optimize overall user satisfaction with the ranked list. We frame this problem within a contextual bandits framework, with each ranked list as an action. Our approach incorporates an upper confidence bound to adjust predicted user satisfaction scores and selects the ranking action that maximizes these adjusted scores, efficiently solved via maximum weight imperfect matching. We demonstrate that our algorithm achieves a cumulative regret bound of $O(dsqrt{NKT})$ for ranking $K$ out of $N$ items in a $d$-dimensional context space over $T$ rounds, under the assumption that user responses follow a generalized linear model. This regret alleviates dependence on the ambient action space, whose cardinality grows exponentially with $N$ and $K$ (thus rendering direct application of existing adaptive learning algorithms -- such as UCB or Thompson sampling -- infeasible). Experiments conducted on both simulated and real-world datasets demonstrate our algorithm outperforms the baseline.
Read more6/10/2024
🌿
0
Two-sided Assortment Optimization: Adaptivity Gaps and Approximation Algorithms
Omar El Housni, Alfredo Torrico, Ulysse Hennebelle
To address the challenge of choice congestion in matching markets, in this work, we introduce a two-sided assortment optimization framework under general choice preferences. The goal in this problem is to maximize the expected number of matches by deciding which assortments are displayed to the agents and the order in which they are shown. In this context, we identify several classes of policies that platforms can use in their design. Our goals are: (1) to measure the value that one class of policies has over another one, and (2) to approximately solve the optimization problem itself for a given class. For (1), we define the adaptivity gap as the worst-case ratio between the optimal values of two different policy classes. First, we show that the gap between the class of policies that statically show assortments to one-side first and the class of policies that adaptively show assortments to one-side first is exactly $1-1/e$. Second, we show that the gap between the latter class of policies and the fully adaptive class of policies that show assortments to agents one by one is exactly $1/2$. We also note that the worst policies are those who simultaneously show assortments to all the agents, in fact, we show that their adaptivity gap even with respect to one-sided static policies can be arbitrarily small. For (2), we first show that there exists a polynomial time policy that achieves a $1/4$ approximation factor within the class of policies that adaptively show assortments to agents one by one. Finally, when agents' preferences are governed by multinomial-logit models, we show that a 0.066 approximation factor can be obtained within the class of policies that show assortments to all agents at once.
Read more4/3/2024
🏋️
0
Top-$K$ ranking with a monotone adversary
Yuepeng Yang, Antares Chen, Lorenzo Orecchia, Cong Ma
In this paper, we address the top-$K$ ranking problem with a monotone adversary. We consider the scenario where a comparison graph is randomly generated and the adversary is allowed to add arbitrary edges. The statistician's goal is then to accurately identify the top-$K$ preferred items based on pairwise comparisons derived from this semi-random comparison graph. The main contribution of this paper is to develop a weighted maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) that achieves near-optimal sample complexity, up to a $log^2(n)$ factor, where $n$ denotes the number of items under comparison. This is made possible through a combination of analytical and algorithmic innovations. On the analytical front, we provide a refined~$ell_infty$ error analysis of the weighted MLE that is more explicit and tighter than existing analyses. It relates the~$ell_infty$ error with the spectral properties of the weighted comparison graph. Motivated by this, our algorithmic innovation involves the development of an SDP-based approach to reweight the semi-random graph and meet specified spectral properties. Additionally, we propose a first-order method based on the Matrix Multiplicative Weight Update (MMWU) framework. This method efficiently solves the resulting SDP in nearly-linear time relative to the size of the semi-random comparison graph.
Read more6/21/2024