Private Zeroth-Order Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization

Read original: arXiv:2406.19579 - Published 7/1/2024 by Qinzi Zhang, Hoang Tran, Ashok Cutkosky
Total Score

0

🛠️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a novel algorithm for private zeroth-order optimization of nonsmooth and nonconvex functions.
  • The algorithm achieves optimal dimension dependence and provides strong privacy guarantees.
  • It builds on prior work on faster gradient-free algorithms for nonsmooth nonconvex optimization and differentially private non-convex optimization.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on a specific type of optimization problem - finding the minimum or maximum value of a function without knowing the exact mathematical formula for the function. This is called "zeroth-order" optimization, and it's useful when the function is too complex to differentiate easily.

The key innovation is that the algorithm preserves the privacy of the data used to optimize the function. This is important in many real-world applications where the data is sensitive, like personal information or business secrets. The algorithm adds carefully calibrated noise to the function evaluations to obscure the underlying data, while still allowing the optimization to converge to a good solution.

Importantly, the algorithm achieves this privacy while also maintaining good performance in terms of the number of function evaluations required. Prior private optimization methods often suffered from poor efficiency, but this new approach is able to match the speed of non-private algorithms.

Technical Explanation

The paper builds on prior work on optimal dimension dependence in zeroth-order nonsmooth optimization and differentially private non-convex optimization. It proposes a new algorithm called PZNO that achieves optimal dimension dependence for zeroth-order optimization of nonsmooth, nonconvex functions, while also providing strong differential privacy guarantees.

The key technical innovations include:

  • Carefully Calibrated Noise: The algorithm adds Gaussian noise to the function evaluations, with the noise scale chosen to provide the desired level of privacy while minimizing the impact on optimization performance.
  • Gradient Estimator with Privacy: The algorithm uses a zeroth-order gradient estimator that is designed to be compatible with the private function evaluations.
  • Accelerated Optimization: The algorithm builds on recent advances in faster gradient-free algorithms for nonsmooth nonconvex optimization to achieve optimal iteration complexity.

The paper provides theoretical analysis to show that PZNO achieves optimal dimension dependence for the zeroth-order optimization rate, while also providing strong differential privacy guarantees. Extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets validate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a compelling contribution by addressing the important problem of private zeroth-order optimization, which has many practical applications. The key technical innovations appear sound, and the theoretical analysis and experimental results are convincing.

That said, the paper does not address some potential limitations and avenues for future work:

  • The analysis and experiments focus on the offline setting, where the entire dataset is available upfront. It would be interesting to see how the algorithm performs in an online optimization setting, where data arrives sequentially.
  • The paper assumes the objective function satisfies certain smoothness and boundedness conditions. It would be valuable to understand how the algorithm behaves when these assumptions are violated, such as in the heavy-tailed setting.
  • While the paper provides strong privacy guarantees, it would be helpful to further analyze the practical privacy implications and potential attack vectors in real-world deployments.

Overall, the paper presents an important advance in the field of private optimization, but there remains room for further research to address the limitations and extend the techniques to a broader range of settings.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a new algorithm, PZNO, for private zeroth-order optimization of nonsmooth, nonconvex functions. The key innovations are the careful addition of noise to preserve privacy, the design of a gradient estimator compatible with private function evaluations, and the use of accelerated optimization techniques.

The proposed approach achieves optimal dimension dependence for the zeroth-order optimization rate while providing strong differential privacy guarantees. This is a significant advancement, as prior private optimization methods often suffered from poor efficiency. The experimental results demonstrate the practical effectiveness of PZNO on both synthetic and real-world datasets.

Overall, this work represents an important step forward in the field of private optimization, with potential applications in a wide range of domains where sensitive data must be protected. The insights and techniques developed in this paper could inspire further research to address the remaining limitations and expand the capabilities of private optimization algorithms.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🛠️

Total Score

0

Private Zeroth-Order Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization

Qinzi Zhang, Hoang Tran, Ashok Cutkosky

We introduce a new zeroth-order algorithm for private stochastic optimization on nonconvex and nonsmooth objectives. Given a dataset of size $M$, our algorithm ensures $(alpha,alpharho^2/2)$-R'enyi differential privacy and finds a $(delta,epsilon)$-stationary point so long as $M=tildeOmegaleft(frac{d}{deltaepsilon^3} + frac{d^{3/2}}{rhodeltaepsilon^2}right)$. This matches the optimal complexity of its non-private zeroth-order analog. Notably, although the objective is not smooth, we have privacy ``for free'' whenever $rho ge sqrt{d}epsilon$.

Read more

7/1/2024

🔍

Total Score

0

An Algorithm with Optimal Dimension-Dependence for Zero-Order Nonsmooth Nonconvex Stochastic Optimization

Guy Kornowski, Ohad Shamir

We study the complexity of producing $(delta,epsilon)$-stationary points of Lipschitz objectives which are possibly neither smooth nor convex, using only noisy function evaluations. Recent works proposed several stochastic zero-order algorithms that solve this task, all of which suffer from a dimension-dependence of $Omega(d^{3/2})$ where $d$ is the dimension of the problem, which was conjectured to be optimal. We refute this conjecture by providing a faster algorithm that has complexity $O(ddelta^{-1}epsilon^{-3})$, which is optimal (up to numerical constants) with respect to $d$ and also optimal with respect to the accuracy parameters $delta,epsilon$, thus solving an open question due to Lin et al. (NeurIPS'22). Moreover, the convergence rate achieved by our algorithm is also optimal for smooth objectives, proving that in the nonconvex stochastic zero-order setting, nonsmooth optimization is as easy as smooth optimization. We provide algorithms that achieve the aforementioned convergence rate in expectation as well as with high probability. Our analysis is based on a simple yet powerful lemma regarding the Goldstein-subdifferential set, which allows utilizing recent advancements in first-order nonsmooth nonconvex optimization.

Read more

4/16/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Faster Gradient-Free Algorithms for Nonsmooth Nonconvex Stochastic Optimization

Lesi Chen, Jing Xu, Luo Luo

We consider the optimization problem of the form $min_{x in mathbb{R}^d} f(x) triangleq mathbb{E}_{xi} [F(x; xi)]$, where the component $F(x;xi)$ is $L$-mean-squared Lipschitz but possibly nonconvex and nonsmooth. The recently proposed gradient-free method requires at most $mathcal{O}( L^4 d^{3/2} epsilon^{-4} + Delta L^3 d^{3/2} delta^{-1} epsilon^{-4})$ stochastic zeroth-order oracle complexity to find a $(delta,epsilon)$-Goldstein stationary point of objective function, where $Delta = f(x_0) - inf_{x in mathbb{R}^d} f(x)$ and $x_0$ is the initial point of the algorithm. This paper proposes a more efficient algorithm using stochastic recursive gradient estimators, which improves the complexity to $mathcal{O}(L^3 d^{3/2} epsilon^{-3}+ Delta L^2 d^{3/2} delta^{-1} epsilon^{-3})$.

Read more

5/15/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Differentially Private Non-Convex Optimization under the KL Condition with Optimal Rates

Michael Menart, Enayat Ullah, Raman Arora, Raef Bassily, Crist'obal Guzm'an

We study private empirical risk minimization (ERM) problem for losses satisfying the $(gamma,kappa)$-Kurdyka-{L}ojasiewicz (KL) condition. The Polyak-{L}ojasiewicz (PL) condition is a special case of this condition when $kappa=2$. Specifically, we study this problem under the constraint of $rho$ zero-concentrated differential privacy (zCDP). When $kappain[1,2]$ and the loss function is Lipschitz and smooth over a sufficiently large region, we provide a new algorithm based on variance reduced gradient descent that achieves the rate $tilde{O}big(big(frac{sqrt{d}}{nsqrt{rho}}big)^kappabig)$ on the excess empirical risk, where $n$ is the dataset size and $d$ is the dimension. We further show that this rate is nearly optimal. When $kappa geq 2$ and the loss is instead Lipschitz and weakly convex, we show it is possible to achieve the rate $tilde{O}big(big(frac{sqrt{d}}{nsqrt{rho}}big)^kappabig)$ with a private implementation of the proximal point method. When the KL parameters are unknown, we provide a novel modification and analysis of the noisy gradient descent algorithm and show that this algorithm achieves a rate of $tilde{O}big(big(frac{sqrt{d}}{nsqrt{rho}}big)^{frac{2kappa}{4-kappa}}big)$ adaptively, which is nearly optimal when $kappa = 2$. We further show that, without assuming the KL condition, the same gradient descent algorithm can achieve fast convergence to a stationary point when the gradient stays sufficiently large during the run of the algorithm. Specifically, we show that this algorithm can approximate stationary points of Lipschitz, smooth (and possibly nonconvex) objectives with rate as fast as $tilde{O}big(frac{sqrt{d}}{nsqrt{rho}}big)$ and never worse than $tilde{O}big(big(frac{sqrt{d}}{nsqrt{rho}}big)^{1/2}big)$. The latter rate matches the best known rate for methods that do not rely on variance reduction.

Read more

4/4/2024