The Open Autonomy Safety Case Framework
2404.05444
0
0
📉
Abstract
A system safety case is a compelling, comprehensible, and valid argument about the satisfaction of the safety goals of a given system operating in a given environment supported by convincing evidence. Since the publication of UL 4600 in 2020, safety cases have become a best practice for measuring, managing, and communicating the safety of autonomous vehicles (AVs). Although UL 4600 provides guidance on how to build the safety case for an AV, the complexity of AVs and their operating environments, the novelty of the used technology, the need for complying with various regulations and technical standards, and for addressing cybersecurity concerns and ethical considerations make the development of safety cases for AVs challenging. To this end, safety case frameworks have been proposed that bring strategies, argument templates, and other guidance together to support the development of a safety case. This paper introduces the Open Autonomy Safety Case Framework, developed over years of work with the autonomous vehicle industry, as a roadmap for how AVs can be deployed safely and responsibly.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- A safety case is a well-reasoned argument supported by evidence that a system can operate safely in a given environment.
- Safety cases have become a best practice for measuring, managing, and communicating the safety of autonomous vehicles (AVs) since the publication of UL 4600 in 2020.
- Developing safety cases for AVs is challenging due to their complexity, novel technologies, regulatory requirements, cybersecurity concerns, and ethical considerations.
- Safety case frameworks have been proposed to support the development of AV safety cases.
Plain English Explanation
A safety case is like a detailed, well-supported explanation of why a system, such as an autonomous vehicle (AV), can operate safely in the real world. It's a way to show that the system's safety goals have been met through convincing evidence and reasoning.
Since 2020, safety cases have become a common approach for demonstrating the safety of AVs. This is because AVs are complex systems that use new technologies, need to follow various regulations, and raise cybersecurity and ethical concerns. All of these factors make it challenging to develop a comprehensive safety case for an AV.
To help address this challenge, researchers have created safety case frameworks. These frameworks provide strategies, templates, and other guidance to support the development of a safety case for an AV. The Open Autonomy Safety Case Framework is one such framework that has been developed through collaboration with the AV industry. It aims to serve as a roadmap for safely and responsibly deploying AVs.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the Open Autonomy Safety Case Framework, which is a comprehensive approach to developing safety cases for autonomous vehicles (AVs). Safety cases are essential for demonstrating that an AV can operate safely in its intended environment, as they provide a structured, evidence-based argument to support this claim.
The complexity of AVs, including their novel technologies, the need to comply with regulations, and concerns around cybersecurity and ethics, make the development of safety cases for these systems particularly challenging. The Open Autonomy Safety Case Framework aims to address these challenges by providing strategies, argument templates, and other guidance to support the creation of a thorough and compelling safety case.
The framework draws on years of collaboration with the AV industry and is designed to serve as a roadmap for the safe and responsible deployment of AVs. It covers various aspects of AV safety, such as scenario-based testing, anomaly detection, remote security, and simulation-based validation, as well as shared control mechanisms to ensure the safety of AV operations.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the challenges involved in developing safety cases for autonomous vehicles (AVs) and introduces the Open Autonomy Safety Case Framework as a potential solution. While the framework appears to be a promising approach, there are a few areas that could be further explored or clarified:
-
Validation and Testing: The paper discusses the use of scenario-based testing and simulation-based validation, but it could be beneficial to provide more details on the specific methods and tools employed within the framework to ensure the thoroughness and reliability of these validation processes.
-
Cybersecurity Considerations: While the paper acknowledges the need to address cybersecurity concerns, it could be helpful to delve deeper into the framework's approach to identifying and mitigating cybersecurity risks, particularly given the increasing threat of cyber attacks on autonomous systems.
-
Ethical Implications: The paper briefly mentions the need to address ethical considerations, but it could be valuable to explore how the framework incorporates ethical principles and decision-making processes to ensure the safe and responsible deployment of AVs.
-
Stakeholder Engagement: The success of the Open Autonomy Safety Case Framework will likely depend on the level of engagement and buy-in from various stakeholders, such as AV manufacturers, regulatory bodies, and the general public. The paper could benefit from discussing the framework's approach to stakeholder collaboration and communication.
Overall, the Open Autonomy Safety Case Framework appears to be a promising step towards enabling the safe and responsible deployment of autonomous vehicles. However, further research and refinement in the areas mentioned above could help strengthen the framework and increase its effectiveness in addressing the complex challenges associated with AV safety.
Conclusion
The paper introduces the Open Autonomy Safety Case Framework as a comprehensive approach to developing safety cases for autonomous vehicles (AVs). Safety cases are crucial for demonstrating that AVs can operate safely in their intended environments, but the complexity of these systems, their novel technologies, and the need to comply with various regulations and address cybersecurity and ethical concerns make the development of safety cases particularly challenging.
The Open Autonomy Safety Case Framework aims to address these challenges by providing strategies, argument templates, and other guidance to support the creation of a thorough and compelling safety case. The framework draws on years of collaboration with the AV industry and is designed to serve as a roadmap for the safe and responsible deployment of AVs.
While the framework appears to be a promising solution, the paper also identifies areas for further exploration, such as the validation and testing methods, the approach to cybersecurity, the incorporation of ethical considerations, and the engagement of stakeholders. Addressing these areas could help strengthen the framework and increase its effectiveness in enabling the safe and responsible integration of autonomous vehicles into our transportation systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤿
Redefining Safety for Autonomous Vehicles
Philip Koopman, William Widen
0
0
Existing definitions and associated conceptual frameworks for computer-based system safety should be revisited in light of real-world experiences from deploying autonomous vehicles. Current terminology used by industry safety standards emphasizes mitigation of risk from specifically identified hazards, and carries assumptions based on human-supervised vehicle operation. Operation without a human driver dramatically increases the scope of safety concerns, especially due to operation in an open world environment, a requirement to self-enforce operational limits, participation in an ad hoc sociotechnical system of systems, and a requirement to conform to both legal and ethical constraints. Existing standards and terminology only partially address these new challenges. We propose updated definitions for core system safety concepts that encompass these additional considerations as a starting point for evolving safe-ty approaches to address these additional safety challenges. These results might additionally inform framing safety terminology for other autonomous system applications.
5/29/2024
✅
Safe by Design Autonomous Driving Systems
Marius Bozga, Joseph Sifakis
0
0
Developing safe autonomous driving systems is a major scientific and technical challenge. Existing AI-based end-to-end solutions do not offer the necessary safety guarantees, while traditional systems engineering approaches are defeated by the complexity of the problem. Currently, there is an increasing interest in hybrid design solutions, integrating machine learning components, when necessary, while using model-based components for goal management and planning. We study a method for building safe by design autonomous driving systems, based on the assumption that the capability to drive boils down to the coordinated execution of a given set of driving operations. The assumption is substantiated by a compositionality result considering that autopilots are dynamic systems receiving a small number of types of vistas as input, each vista defining a free space in its neighborhood. It is shown that safe driving for each type of vista in the corresponding free space, implies safe driving for any possible scenario under some easy-to-check conditions concerning the transition between vistas. The designed autopilot comprises distinct control policies one per type of vista, articulated in two consecutive phases. The first phase consists of carefully managing a potentially risky situation by virtually reducing speed, while the second phase consists of exiting the situation by accelerating. The autopilots designed use for their predictions simple functions characterizing the acceleration and deceleration capabilities of the vehicles. They cover the main driving operations, including entering a main road, overtaking, crossing intersections protected by traffic lights or signals, and driving on freeways. The results presented reinforce the case for hybrid solutions that incorporate mathematically elegant and robust decision methods that are safe by design.
5/21/2024
Extending Structural Causal Models for Use in Autonomous Embodied Systems
Rhys Howard, Lars Kunze
0
0
Much work has been done to develop causal reasoning techniques across a number of domains, however the utilisation of causality within autonomous systems is still in its infancy. Autonomous systems would greatly benefit from the integration of causality through the use of representations such as structural causal models (SCMs). The system would be afforded a higher level of transparency, it would enable post-hoc explanations of outcomes, and assist in the online inference of exogenous variables. These qualities are either directly beneficial to the autonomous system or a valuable step in building public trust and informing regulation. To such an end we present a case study in which we describe a module-based autonomous driving system comprised of SCMs. Approaching this task requires considerations of a number of challenges when dealing with a system of great complexity and size, that must operate for extended periods of time by itself. Here we describe these challenges, and present solutions. The first of these is SCM contexts, with the remainder being three new variable categories -- two of which are based upon functional programming monads. Finally, we conclude by presenting an example application of the causal capabilities of the autonomous driving system. In this example, we aim to attribute culpability between vehicular agents in a hypothetical road collision incident.
6/4/2024
Towards a Completeness Argumentation for Scenario Concepts
Christoph Glasmacher, Hendrik Weber, Lutz Eckstein
0
0
Scenario-based testing has become a promising approach to overcome the complexity of real-world traffic for safety assurance of automated vehicles. Within scenario-based testing, a system under test is confronted with a set of predefined scenarios. This set shall ensure more efficient testing of an automated vehicle operating in an open context compared to real-world testing. However, the question arises if a scenario catalog can cover the open context sufficiently to allow an argumentation for sufficiently safe driving functions and how this can be proven. Within this paper, a methodology is proposed to argue a sufficient completeness of a scenario concept using a goal structured notation. Thereby, the distinction between completeness and coverage is discussed. For both, methods are proposed for a streamlined argumentation and regarding evidence. These methods are applied to a scenario concept and the inD dataset to prove the usability.
4/3/2024