Open-Endedness is Essential for Artificial Superhuman Intelligence
4
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper argues that open-endedness is essential for achieving artificial superhuman intelligence (ASI).
- It defines open-endedness as the ability to continually explore and discover new possibilities without being constrained by predetermined objectives.
- The authors suggest that open-endedness is a key requirement for developing AI systems that can match or exceed human-level intelligence across a wide range of domains.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers behind this paper believe that for AI systems to truly surpass human intelligence, they need to be able to explore and discover new ideas without being limited by pre-set goals or objectives. They argue that "open-endedness" - the ability to continuously expand one's capabilities and knowledge - is a critical characteristic for developing artificial superhuman intelligence (ASI).
The paper explains that current AI systems are often designed to excel at specific, narrowly-defined tasks, like playing chess or recognizing images. While impressive, these systems lack the broader, more flexible intelligence that humans possess. The authors propose that by imbuing AI with open-endedness - the drive to continuously explore new ideas and possibilities - we can create systems that can match or surpass human-level abilities across a wide range of domains.
This open-ended approach aligns with the emerging field of foundation models, which aims to develop highly versatile AI systems that can be adapted to a variety of tasks. The researchers argue that embracing open-endedness is key to unlocking the true potential of these foundation models and paving the way for artificial superhuman intelligence.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by defining open-endedness as the ability of an AI system to continually explore and discover new possibilities without being constrained by predetermined objectives or outcomes. The authors argue that this property is essential for developing artificial superhuman intelligence (ASI) - AI systems that can match or exceed human-level abilities across a wide range of domains.
The researchers contrast open-endedness with the more narrow, task-specific focus of many current AI systems, which excel at particular challenges like playing chess or recognizing images, but lack the broader, more flexible intelligence of humans. They propose that by imbuing AI with open-endedness - the drive to continuously expand its capabilities and knowledge - we can create systems capable of matching or exceeding human-level performance across a wide variety of tasks.
The paper also links the concept of open-endedness to the emerging field of foundation models - highly versatile AI systems that can be adapted to a variety of tasks. The authors argue that embracing open-endedness is key to unlocking the true potential of these foundation models and paving the way for the development of artificial superhuman intelligence.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for the importance of open-endedness in the development of artificial superhuman intelligence. The authors' arguments are well-reasoned and grounded in the current state of AI research and development.
However, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific technical challenges or approaches for imbuing AI systems with genuine open-endedness. While the link to foundation models is intriguing, the paper could benefit from a more detailed exploration of how open-endedness can be practically implemented and evaluated within these versatile AI architectures.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential risks or ethical concerns associated with the pursuit of artificial superhuman intelligence. As this technology advances, it will be crucial for researchers to carefully consider the societal implications and ensure that open-endedness is developed and deployed in a responsible manner.
Conclusion
This paper makes a compelling case for the importance of open-endedness in the development of artificial superhuman intelligence (ASI). The authors argue that by imbuing AI systems with the ability to continuously explore and discover new possibilities, we can unlock their true potential and create technologies that match or exceed human-level abilities across a wide range of domains.
The link between open-endedness and the emerging field of foundation models is particularly intriguing, and the paper suggests that embracing this principle could be key to unlocking the full potential of these versatile AI architectures. While the paper could benefit from more technical details and a deeper exploration of potential risks and ethical considerations, it nonetheless offers a thought-provoking perspective on the future of AI and the path towards artificial superhuman intelligence.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
4
Open-Endedness is Essential for Artificial Superhuman Intelligence
Edward Hughes, Michael Dennis, Jack Parker-Holder, Feryal Behbahani, Aditi Mavalankar, Yuge Shi, Tom Schaul, Tim Rocktaschel
In recent years there has been a tremendous surge in the general capabilities of AI systems, mainly fuelled by training foundation models on internetscale data. Nevertheless, the creation of openended, ever self-improving AI remains elusive. In this position paper, we argue that the ingredients are now in place to achieve openendedness in AI systems with respect to a human observer. Furthermore, we claim that such open-endedness is an essential property of any artificial superhuman intelligence (ASI). We begin by providing a concrete formal definition of open-endedness through the lens of novelty and learnability. We then illustrate a path towards ASI via open-ended systems built on top of foundation models, capable of making novel, humanrelevant discoveries. We conclude by examining the safety implications of generally-capable openended AI. We expect that open-ended foundation models will prove to be an increasingly fertile and safety-critical area of research in the near future.
Read more6/7/2024
🔎
0
A social path to human-like artificial intelligence
Edgar A. Du'e~nez-Guzm'an, Suzanne Sadedin, Jane X. Wang, Kevin R. McKee, Joel Z. Leibo
Traditionally, cognitive and computer scientists have viewed intelligence solipsistically, as a property of unitary agents devoid of social context. Given the success of contemporary learning algorithms, we argue that the bottleneck in artificial intelligence (AI) progress is shifting from data assimilation to novel data generation. We bring together evidence showing that natural intelligence emerges at multiple scales in networks of interacting agents via collective living, social relationships and major evolutionary transitions, which contribute to novel data generation through mechanisms such as population pressures, arms races, Machiavellian selection, social learning and cumulative culture. Many breakthroughs in AI exploit some of these processes, from multi-agent structures enabling algorithms to master complex games like Capture-The-Flag and StarCraft II, to strategic communication in Diplomacy and the shaping of AI data streams by other AIs. Moving beyond a solipsistic view of agency to integrate these mechanisms suggests a path to human-like compounding innovation through ongoing novel data generation.
Read more5/28/2024
🎲
0
Towards a Framework for Openness in Foundation Models: Proceedings from the Columbia Convening on Openness in Artificial Intelligence
Adrien Basdevant, Camille Franc{c}ois, Victor Storchan, Kevin Bankston, Ayah Bdeir, Brian Behlendorf, Merouane Debbah, Sayash Kapoor, Yann LeCun, Mark Surman, Helen King-Turvey, Nathan Lambert, Stefano Maffulli, Nik Marda, Govind Shivkumar, Justine Tunney
Over the past year, there has been a robust debate about the benefits and risks of open sourcing foundation models. However, this discussion has often taken place at a high level of generality or with a narrow focus on specific technical attributes. In part, this is because defining open source for foundation models has proven tricky, given its significant differences from traditional software development. In order to inform more practical and nuanced decisions about opening AI systems, including foundation models, this paper presents a framework for grappling with openness across the AI stack. It summarizes previous work on this topic, analyzes the various potential reasons to pursue openness, and outlines how openness varies in different parts of the AI stack, both at the model and at the system level. In doing so, its authors hope to provide a common descriptive framework to deepen a nuanced and rigorous understanding of openness in AI and enable further work around definitions of openness and safety in AI.
Read more5/28/2024
🤖
0
The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discovery
Chris Lu, Cong Lu, Robert Tjarko Lange, Jakob Foerster, Jeff Clune, David Ha
One of the grand challenges of artificial general intelligence is developing agents capable of conducting scientific research and discovering new knowledge. While frontier models have already been used as aides to human scientists, e.g. for brainstorming ideas, writing code, or prediction tasks, they still conduct only a small part of the scientific process. This paper presents the first comprehensive framework for fully automatic scientific discovery, enabling frontier large language models to perform research independently and communicate their findings. We introduce The AI Scientist, which generates novel research ideas, writes code, executes experiments, visualizes results, describes its findings by writing a full scientific paper, and then runs a simulated review process for evaluation. In principle, this process can be repeated to iteratively develop ideas in an open-ended fashion, acting like the human scientific community. We demonstrate its versatility by applying it to three distinct subfields of machine learning: diffusion modeling, transformer-based language modeling, and learning dynamics. Each idea is implemented and developed into a full paper at a cost of less than $15 per paper. To evaluate the generated papers, we design and validate an automated reviewer, which we show achieves near-human performance in evaluating paper scores. The AI Scientist can produce papers that exceed the acceptance threshold at a top machine learning conference as judged by our automated reviewer. This approach signifies the beginning of a new era in scientific discovery in machine learning: bringing the transformative benefits of AI agents to the entire research process of AI itself, and taking us closer to a world where endless affordable creativity and innovation can be unleashed on the world's most challenging problems. Our code is open-sourced at https://github.com/SakanaAI/AI-Scientist
Read more9/4/2024