Open Models, Closed Minds? On Agents Capabilities in Mimicking Human Personalities through Open Large Language Models

Read original: arXiv:2401.07115 - Published 6/26/2024 by Lucio La Cava, Andrea Tagarelli
Total Score

0

💬

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper investigates the ability of Open Large Language Models (LLMs) to exhibit human-like personality traits.
  • The researchers studied a set of 12 Open LLM agents to assess their intrinsic personalities using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and the Big Five Inventory (BFI) tests.
  • They also explored the extent to which these agents can mimic specific human personalities when conditioned with personality-based prompts or roles.

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores the relationship between natural language processing (NLP) and human psychology, focusing on the ability of Open LLMs to exhibit human-like personality traits. The researchers used a set of 12 Open LLM agents, representing the most prominent open-source models, and assessed their intrinsic personalities using well-known psychological tests, such as the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and the Big Five Inventory (BFI).

The researchers also investigated whether these agents could mimic specific human personalities by conditioning them with personality-based prompts or roles. The findings reveal that each Open LLM agent has distinct human personalities, but the ability to successfully mirror the imposed personality varies. Some agents were able to adapt their personalities, while others remained "closed-minded" and retained their intrinsic traits. The researchers also found that combining role and personality conditioning can enhance the agents' ability to mimic human personalities.

This work represents an important step in understanding the relationship between NLP and human psychology, particularly through the lens of Open LLMs. By studying the intrinsic and conditioned personalities of these models, the researchers are shedding light on the complex interplay between language, cognition, and human-like behaviors.

Technical Explanation

The paper investigates the ability of Open LLMs to mimic human personalities. The researchers employed a set of 12 LLM agents based on the most representative Open models and subjected them to assessments using the MBTI and BFI tests to evaluate their intrinsic personality traits.

The researchers then explored the extent to which these agents could mimic specific human personalities when conditioned by personality-based prompts or roles. Their findings reveal that each Open LLM agent exhibits distinct human personalities, but the effects of personality conditioning vary. Only a few agents successfully mirrored the imposed personality, while most of them remained "closed-minded" and retained their intrinsic traits. The researchers also found that combining role and personality conditioning can enhance the agents' ability to mimic human personalities.

This work represents an important step in understanding the relationship between NLP and human psychology, as it provides insights into the ability of LLMs to infer personality from language and the complex nature of simulating human-like mindsets within these models.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides valuable insights into the relationship between NLP and human psychology, particularly the ability of Open LLMs to exhibit and mimic human-like personalities. However, the researchers acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research.

One key limitation is the scope of the study, which focused primarily on Open LLM agents and did not include an analysis of commercially-licensed LLMs. It would be interesting to see how the findings compare across different types of LLMs, both open-source and proprietary.

Additionally, the researchers note that the personality conditioning approach used in the study may not fully capture the nuances and complexities of human personality. Further research is needed to explore more sophisticated methods for instilling human-like traits and behaviors in LLMs.

Another potential area for exploration is the long-term stability and consistency of the personality traits exhibited by the LLM agents. The paper does not address whether these traits are persistent or subject to change over time and across different interactions.

Overall, this research represents an important step forward in understanding the interplay between language, cognition, and human-like behaviors in LLMs. However, continued investigation and a broader range of experimentation will be necessary to fully unravel the dense relationship between NLP and human psychology.

Conclusion

This paper investigates the ability of Open LLMs to exhibit and mimic human-like personality traits, providing valuable insights into the relationship between natural language processing and human psychology. The researchers evaluated the intrinsic personalities of a set of 12 Open LLM agents and explored the extent to which these agents could adapt to specific human personalities through conditioning.

The findings reveal that each Open LLM agent has distinct human personalities, but the success of personality-based conditioning varies. While some agents were able to mirror the imposed personality, others remained "closed-minded" and retained their intrinsic traits. The researchers also found that combining role and personality conditioning can enhance the agents' ability to mimic human personalities.

This work represents an important step forward in understanding the complex interplay between language, cognition, and human-like behaviors in LLMs. By exploring the inherent and conditioned personalities of these models, the researchers are shedding light on the dense relationship between NLP and human psychology, with potential implications for the development of more human-like AI systems and the advancement of the field as a whole.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

💬

Total Score

0

Open Models, Closed Minds? On Agents Capabilities in Mimicking Human Personalities through Open Large Language Models

Lucio La Cava, Andrea Tagarelli

The emergence of unveiling human-like behaviors in Large Language Models (LLMs) has led to a closer connection between NLP and human psychology. Scholars have been studying the inherent personalities exhibited by LLMs and attempting to incorporate human traits and behaviors into them. However, these efforts have primarily focused on commercially-licensed LLMs, neglecting the widespread use and notable advancements seen in Open LLMs. This work aims to address this gap by employing a set of 12 LLM Agents based on the most representative Open models and subject them to a series of assessments concerning the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) test and the Big Five Inventory (BFI) test. Our approach involves evaluating the intrinsic personality traits of Open LLM agents and determining the extent to which these agents can mimic human personalities when conditioned by specific personalities and roles. Our findings unveil that $(i)$ each Open LLM agent showcases distinct human personalities; $(ii)$ personality-conditioned prompting produces varying effects on the agents, with only few successfully mirroring the imposed personality, while most of them being ``closed-minded'' (i.e., they retain their intrinsic traits); and $(iii)$ combining role and personality conditioning can enhance the agents' ability to mimic human personalities. Our work represents a step up in understanding the dense relationship between NLP and human psychology through the lens of Open LLMs.

Read more

6/26/2024

💬

Total Score

0

PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traits

Hang Jiang, Xiajie Zhang, Xubo Cao, Cynthia Breazeal, Deb Roy, Jad Kabbara

Despite the many use cases for large language models (LLMs) in creating personalized chatbots, there has been limited research on evaluating the extent to which the behaviors of personalized LLMs accurately and consistently reflect specific personality traits. We consider studying the behavior of LLM-based agents which we refer to as LLM personas and present a case study with GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 to investigate whether LLMs can generate content that aligns with their assigned personality profiles. To this end, we simulate distinct LLM personas based on the Big Five personality model, have them complete the 44-item Big Five Inventory (BFI) personality test and a story writing task, and then assess their essays with automatic and human evaluations. Results show that LLM personas' self-reported BFI scores are consistent with their designated personality types, with large effect sizes observed across five traits. Additionally, LLM personas' writings have emerging representative linguistic patterns for personality traits when compared with a human writing corpus. Furthermore, human evaluation shows that humans can perceive some personality traits with an accuracy of up to 80%. Interestingly, the accuracy drops significantly when the annotators were informed of AI authorship.

Read more

4/3/2024

🏷️

Total Score

0

Limited Ability of LLMs to Simulate Human Psychological Behaviours: a Psychometric Analysis

Nikolay B Petrov, Gregory Serapio-Garc'ia, Jason Rentfrow

The humanlike responses of large language models (LLMs) have prompted social scientists to investigate whether LLMs can be used to simulate human participants in experiments, opinion polls and surveys. Of central interest in this line of research has been mapping out the psychological profiles of LLMs by prompting them to respond to standardized questionnaires. The conflicting findings of this research are unsurprising given that mapping out underlying, or latent, traits from LLMs' text responses to questionnaires is no easy task. To address this, we use psychometrics, the science of psychological measurement. In this study, we prompt OpenAI's flagship models, GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, to assume different personas and respond to a range of standardized measures of personality constructs. We used two kinds of persona descriptions: either generic (four or five random person descriptions) or specific (mostly demographics of actual humans from a large-scale human dataset). We found that the responses from GPT-4, but not GPT-3.5, using generic persona descriptions show promising, albeit not perfect, psychometric properties, similar to human norms, but the data from both LLMs when using specific demographic profiles, show poor psychometrics properties. We conclude that, currently, when LLMs are asked to simulate silicon personas, their responses are poor signals of potentially underlying latent traits. Thus, our work casts doubt on LLMs' ability to simulate individual-level human behaviour across multiple-choice question answering tasks.

Read more

5/14/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Assessing the nature of large language models: A caution against anthropocentrism

Ann Speed

Generative AI models garnered a large amount of public attention and speculation with the release of OpenAIs chatbot, ChatGPT. At least two opinion camps exist: one excited about possibilities these models offer for fundamental changes to human tasks, and another highly concerned about power these models seem to have. To address these concerns, we assessed several LLMs, primarily GPT 3.5, using standard, normed, and validated cognitive and personality measures. For this seedling project, we developed a battery of tests that allowed us to estimate the boundaries of some of these models capabilities, how stable those capabilities are over a short period of time, and how they compare to humans. Our results indicate that LLMs are unlikely to have developed sentience, although its ability to respond to personality inventories is interesting. GPT3.5 did display large variability in both cognitive and personality measures over repeated observations, which is not expected if it had a human-like personality. Variability notwithstanding, LLMs display what in a human would be considered poor mental health, including low self-esteem, marked dissociation from reality, and in some cases narcissism and psychopathy, despite upbeat and helpful responses.

Read more

6/28/2024