Open Problems in Technical AI Governance
0
🤖
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- AI progress is creating both risks and opportunities, but it is often unclear how to navigate them.
- Technical AI governance aims to use technical analysis and tools to support effective governance of AI systems.
- It can help identify areas needing intervention, assess potential governance actions, and enhance governance options.
- This paper explains what technical AI governance is, why it's important, and presents a taxonomy and catalog of open problems.
Plain English Explanation
Technical AI governance refers to the use of technical analysis and tools to help manage the risks and opportunities presented by the rapid progress of artificial intelligence (AI) systems. As AI becomes more advanced and widespread, there are growing concerns about how to ensure it is developed and used responsibly.
Technical AI governance seeks to address these challenges in a few key ways:
-
Identifying areas for intervention: By closely analyzing AI systems and their impacts, technical governance can help pinpoint specific areas where action or oversight is needed to mitigate risks or maximize benefits.
-
Assessing governance options: Technical experts can evaluate the potential effectiveness of different governance approaches, such as new regulations, incentives, or compliance mechanisms, to determine the best ways to steer the development of AI.
-
Enhancing governance: In some cases, technical researchers may be able to design new technical tools or systems that can be integrated into governance frameworks to help enforce rules, monitor compliance, or facilitate desired AI behaviors.
Overall, technical AI governance aims to bring rigorous, data-driven analysis to the challenge of ensuring AI systems are safe, ethical, and beneficial as they become increasingly prominent in our lives. By bridging the gap between technical AI capabilities and high-level governance, it seeks to help navigate the complex landscape of AI progress.
Technical Explanation
This paper provides an overview of the emerging field of technical AI governance. It explains that as AI systems become more advanced and widespread, there are growing concerns about how to manage the associated risks and opportunities.
The authors argue that technical analysis and tools can play an important role in supporting the effective governance of AI. Technical AI governance can help in three main ways:
-
Identifying areas for intervention: By closely studying AI systems and their impacts, technical experts can pinpoint specific areas where some form of governance, such as regulation or oversight, may be needed.
-
Assessing potential governance actions: Technical researchers can evaluate the likely efficacy of different governance approaches, such as new incentive structures or compliance mechanisms, to determine the best ways to steer AI development.
-
Enhancing governance options: In some cases, technical experts may be able to design new technical tools or systems that can be incorporated into governance frameworks to aid enforcement, monitoring, or desired AI behaviors.
The paper then presents a taxonomy and incomplete catalog of the open problems in technical AI governance. These range from developing frameworks for AI risk assessment to designing technical systems for AI compliance and oversight.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for the importance of technical AI governance as a means of navigating the complex challenges posed by advancing AI capabilities. By integrating technical expertise into the governance process, it argues, we can make more informed and effective decisions about how to mitigate risks and capture the benefits of AI progress.
However, the paper acknowledges that the field of technical AI governance is still quite nascent, with many open problems and uncertainties that require further research and development. For example, the authors note that there are significant challenges in accurately modeling the long-term impacts of AI systems and designing effective technical compliance mechanisms.
Furthermore, the paper does not address potential limitations or downsides of technical AI governance. There may be concerns about the objectivity and transparency of technical analyses, or about the risk of over-reliance on technical "fixes" for fundamentally social and political challenges. Participatory approaches that involve diverse stakeholders may also be important to ensure legitimate and equitable governance.
Overall, this paper provides a useful framework for understanding the role of technical research in AI governance, but more work is needed to secure the future of this important and complex field.
Conclusion
This paper introduces the concept of technical AI governance - the use of technical analysis and tools to support the effective governance of artificial intelligence systems. As AI becomes more advanced and prevalent, technical governance can help identify areas needing intervention, assess the potential impact of different governance approaches, and enhance governance options through the design of new technical mechanisms.
While the field of technical AI governance is still in its early stages, with many open problems and challenges, the paper argues that it has an important role to play in navigating the risks and opportunities presented by AI progress. By bridging the gap between technical AI capabilities and high-level governance, technical governance seeks to enable more informed, effective, and responsible management of this transformative technology.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤖
0
Open Problems in Technical AI Governance
Anka Reuel, Ben Bucknall, Stephen Casper, Tim Fist, Lisa Soder, Onni Aarne, Lewis Hammond, Lujain Ibrahim, Alan Chan, Peter Wills, Markus Anderljung, Ben Garfinkel, Lennart Heim, Andrew Trask, Gabriel Mukobi, Rylan Schaeffer, Mauricio Baker, Sara Hooker, Irene Solaiman, Alexandra Sasha Luccioni, Nitarshan Rajkumar, Nicolas Moes, Jeffrey Ladish, Neel Guha, Jessica Newman, Yoshua Bengio, Tobin South, Alex Pentland, Sanmi Koyejo, Mykel J. Kochenderfer, Robert Trager
AI progress is creating a growing range of risks and opportunities, but it is often unclear how they should be navigated. In many cases, the barriers and uncertainties faced are at least partly technical. Technical AI governance, referring to technical analysis and tools for supporting the effective governance of AI, seeks to address such challenges. It can help to (a) identify areas where intervention is needed, (b) identify and assess the efficacy of potential governance actions, and (c) enhance governance options by designing mechanisms for enforcement, incentivization, or compliance. In this paper, we explain what technical AI governance is, why it is important, and present a taxonomy and incomplete catalog of its open problems. This paper is intended as a resource for technical researchers or research funders looking to contribute to AI governance.
Read more7/23/2024
0
Position Paper: Technical Research and Talent is Needed for Effective AI Governance
Anka Reuel, Lisa Soder, Ben Bucknall, Trond Arne Undheim
In light of recent advancements in AI capabilities and the increasingly widespread integration of AI systems into society, governments worldwide are actively seeking to mitigate the potential harms and risks associated with these technologies through regulation and other governance tools. However, there exist significant gaps between governance aspirations and the current state of the technical tooling necessary for their realisation. In this position paper, we survey policy documents published by public-sector institutions in the EU, US, and China to highlight specific areas of disconnect between the technical requirements necessary for enacting proposed policy actions, and the current technical state of the art. Our analysis motivates a call for tighter integration of the AI/ML research community within AI governance in order to i) catalyse technical research aimed at bridging the gap between current and supposed technical underpinnings of regulatory action, as well as ii) increase the level of technical expertise within governing institutions so as to inform and guide effective governance of AI.
Read more6/12/2024
🔍
0
Governance of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Companies
Johannes Schneider, Rene Abraham, Christian Meske
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), specifically large language models like ChatGPT, has swiftly entered organizations without adequate governance, posing both opportunities and risks. Despite extensive debates on GenAI's transformative nature and regulatory measures, limited research addresses organizational governance, encompassing technical and business perspectives. Our review paper fills this gap by surveying recent works with the purpose of developing a framework for GenAI governance within companies. This framework outlines the scope, objectives, and governance mechanisms tailored to harness business opportunities as well as mitigate risks associated with GenAI integration. Our research contributes a focused approach to GenAI governance, offering practical insights for companies navigating the challenges of GenAI adoption and highlighting research gaps.
Read more6/11/2024
🤖
0
Generative AI Needs Adaptive Governance
Anka Reuel, Trond Arne Undheim
Because of the speed of its development, broad scope of application, and its ability to augment human performance, generative AI challenges the very notions of governance, trust, and human agency. The technology's capacity to mimic human knowledge work, feedback loops including significant uptick in users, research, investor, policy, and media attention, data and compute resources, all lead to rapidly increasing capabilities. For those reasons, adaptive governance, where AI governance and AI co-evolve, is essential for governing generative AI. In sharp contrast to traditional governance's regulatory regimes that are based on a mix of rigid one-and-done provisions for disclosure, registration and risk management, which in the case of AI carry the potential for regulatory misalignment, this paper argues that generative AI calls for adaptive governance. We define adaptive governance in the context of AI and outline an adaptive AI governance framework. We outline actors, roles, as well as both shared and actors-specific policy activities. We further provide examples of how the framework could be operationalized in practice. We then explain that the adaptive AI governance stance is not without its risks and limitations, such as insufficient oversight, insufficient depth, regulatory uncertainty, and regulatory capture, and provide potential approaches to fix these shortcomings.
Read more6/10/2024