Position Paper: Technical Research and Talent is Needed for Effective AI Governance
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper discusses the need for technical research and talent to support effective governance of artificial intelligence (AI) systems.
- It highlights the gap between policy aspirations and the technical expertise required to implement robust AI governance frameworks.
- The paper calls for greater collaboration between policymakers, technical researchers, and AI practitioners to address the governance challenges posed by advanced AI systems.
Plain English Explanation
The paper argues that effective governance of AI systems requires a deep understanding of the underlying technical details and capabilities of these technologies. Currently, there is a disconnect between the policy goals set by governments and regulators, and the practical implementation of AI governance frameworks.
Policymakers often lack the technical expertise to fully comprehend the nuances and potential risks associated with AI systems. Conversely, technical researchers and AI practitioners may not always consider the broader societal implications of their work. To bridge this gap, the paper emphasizes the need for closer collaboration between these two groups.
By bringing together policymakers, technical researchers, and AI practitioners, the authors believe that more robust and informed governance strategies can be developed. This would help ensure that AI systems are deployed in a way that aligns with societal values and mitigates potential harms.
The paper suggests that investment in technical research and the cultivation of specialized talent in AI governance is crucial. This would enable the development of tools, methodologies, and best practices to support effective AI oversight and decision-making.
Technical Explanation
The paper identifies a fundamental gap between the policy aspirations for AI governance and the technical research and expertise required to implement these goals effectively. It argues that bridging this gap is essential for the successful deployment of AI systems that align with societal values and mitigate potential risks.
The authors highlight several areas where the technical complexity of AI systems poses challenges for policymakers and regulators. These include, but are not limited to, understanding the inner workings of AI models, evaluating the potential for unintended behaviors, and developing effective mechanisms for monitoring and controlling AI systems.
To address these challenges, the paper calls for a concerted effort to foster collaboration between policymakers, technical researchers, and AI practitioners. This would involve:
- Increasing investment in technical research focused on AI governance, such as the development of tools and methodologies to support the oversight and control of AI systems.
- Cultivating a specialized talent pool with expertise in both technical and policy domains, enabling them to bridge the gap between high-level governance objectives and the practical implementation of AI control mechanisms.
- Establishing formal channels of communication and knowledge-sharing between the various stakeholders involved in AI governance, including regulators, industry leaders, and academic researchers.
By implementing these strategies, the authors believe that more effective and informed governance frameworks can be developed, ensuring that the deployment of AI systems is aligned with societal values and mitigates potential harms.
Critical Analysis
The paper raises valid concerns about the current disconnect between policy aspirations and technical capabilities in the realm of AI governance. It rightly points out the challenges faced by policymakers in comprehending the nuances and complexities of advanced AI systems, and the need for greater collaboration with technical researchers and practitioners.
One potential limitation of the paper is that it does not delve deeply into the specific technical obstacles that hinder the implementation of effective AI governance frameworks. While it acknowledges the general complexity of AI systems, more detailed analysis of the technical hurdles and potential solutions could have strengthened the paper's arguments.
Furthermore, the paper could have explored the inherent tensions and trade-offs that may arise when attempting to reconcile the diverse perspectives of policymakers, technical researchers, and AI practitioners. Addressing these challenges in a more comprehensive manner could have provided a more well-rounded understanding of the barriers to effective AI governance.
Despite these minor limitations, the paper's core message remains compelling. The call for increased investment in technical research and the cultivation of specialized talent in AI governance is a crucial step towards bridging the gap between policy aspirations and practical implementation. Encouraging this type of interdisciplinary collaboration is essential for developing governance frameworks that can effectively harness the potential of AI while mitigating its risks.
Conclusion
The paper highlights the pressing need for technical research and talent to support the development of effective AI governance frameworks. It argues that the current disconnect between policy aspirations and technical capabilities poses a significant challenge to the responsible deployment of AI systems.
By emphasizing the importance of fostering collaboration between policymakers, technical researchers, and AI practitioners, the paper lays the groundwork for a more holistic and informed approach to AI governance. Investing in specialized technical expertise and establishing formal channels of communication can help ensure that the deployment of AI aligns with societal values and mitigates potential harms.
As the influence of AI continues to grow, addressing the governance challenges posed by these technologies will become increasingly critical. The insights and recommendations presented in this paper offer a valuable starting point for bridging the gap between policy and practice, ultimately paving the way for the responsible development and use of AI.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Position Paper: Technical Research and Talent is Needed for Effective AI Governance
Anka Reuel, Lisa Soder, Ben Bucknall, Trond Arne Undheim
In light of recent advancements in AI capabilities and the increasingly widespread integration of AI systems into society, governments worldwide are actively seeking to mitigate the potential harms and risks associated with these technologies through regulation and other governance tools. However, there exist significant gaps between governance aspirations and the current state of the technical tooling necessary for their realisation. In this position paper, we survey policy documents published by public-sector institutions in the EU, US, and China to highlight specific areas of disconnect between the technical requirements necessary for enacting proposed policy actions, and the current technical state of the art. Our analysis motivates a call for tighter integration of the AI/ML research community within AI governance in order to i) catalyse technical research aimed at bridging the gap between current and supposed technical underpinnings of regulatory action, as well as ii) increase the level of technical expertise within governing institutions so as to inform and guide effective governance of AI.
Read more6/12/2024
🤖
0
Open Problems in Technical AI Governance
Anka Reuel, Ben Bucknall, Stephen Casper, Tim Fist, Lisa Soder, Onni Aarne, Lewis Hammond, Lujain Ibrahim, Alan Chan, Peter Wills, Markus Anderljung, Ben Garfinkel, Lennart Heim, Andrew Trask, Gabriel Mukobi, Rylan Schaeffer, Mauricio Baker, Sara Hooker, Irene Solaiman, Alexandra Sasha Luccioni, Nitarshan Rajkumar, Nicolas Moes, Jeffrey Ladish, Neel Guha, Jessica Newman, Yoshua Bengio, Tobin South, Alex Pentland, Sanmi Koyejo, Mykel J. Kochenderfer, Robert Trager
AI progress is creating a growing range of risks and opportunities, but it is often unclear how they should be navigated. In many cases, the barriers and uncertainties faced are at least partly technical. Technical AI governance, referring to technical analysis and tools for supporting the effective governance of AI, seeks to address such challenges. It can help to (a) identify areas where intervention is needed, (b) identify and assess the efficacy of potential governance actions, and (c) enhance governance options by designing mechanisms for enforcement, incentivization, or compliance. In this paper, we explain what technical AI governance is, why it is important, and present a taxonomy and incomplete catalog of its open problems. This paper is intended as a resource for technical researchers or research funders looking to contribute to AI governance.
Read more7/23/2024
🤖
0
Assessing the State of AI Policy
Joanna F. DeFranco, Luke Biersmith
The deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) applications has accelerated rapidly. AI enabled technologies are facing the public in many ways including infrastructure, consumer products and home applications. Because many of these technologies present risks either in the form of physical injury, or bias, potentially yielding unfair outcomes, policy makers must consider the need for oversight. Most policymakers, however, lack the technical knowledge to judge whether an emerging AI technology is safe, effective, and requires oversight, therefore policy makers must depend on expert opinion. But policymakers are better served when, in addition to expert opinion, they have some general understanding of existing guidelines and regulations. This work provides an overview [the landscape] of AI legislation and directives at the international, U.S. state, city and federal levels. It also reviews relevant business standards, and technical society initiatives. Then an overlap and gap analysis are performed resulting in a reference guide that includes recommendations and guidance for future policy making.
Read more8/1/2024
🤖
0
Generative AI Needs Adaptive Governance
Anka Reuel, Trond Arne Undheim
Because of the speed of its development, broad scope of application, and its ability to augment human performance, generative AI challenges the very notions of governance, trust, and human agency. The technology's capacity to mimic human knowledge work, feedback loops including significant uptick in users, research, investor, policy, and media attention, data and compute resources, all lead to rapidly increasing capabilities. For those reasons, adaptive governance, where AI governance and AI co-evolve, is essential for governing generative AI. In sharp contrast to traditional governance's regulatory regimes that are based on a mix of rigid one-and-done provisions for disclosure, registration and risk management, which in the case of AI carry the potential for regulatory misalignment, this paper argues that generative AI calls for adaptive governance. We define adaptive governance in the context of AI and outline an adaptive AI governance framework. We outline actors, roles, as well as both shared and actors-specific policy activities. We further provide examples of how the framework could be operationalized in practice. We then explain that the adaptive AI governance stance is not without its risks and limitations, such as insufficient oversight, insufficient depth, regulatory uncertainty, and regulatory capture, and provide potential approaches to fix these shortcomings.
Read more6/10/2024