OPTDTALS: Approximate Logic Synthesis via Optimal Decision Trees Approach
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper OPTDTALS presents a novel approach for approximate logic synthesis using optimal decision trees.
- It introduces a method to efficiently find the best decision tree representation for a given Boolean function, which can be used for approximate logic synthesis.
- The approach aims to produce compact and accurate decision tree models that can be implemented in hardware for energy-efficient approximate computing.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new technique called OPTDTALS for approximate logic synthesis. Approximate logic synthesis is the process of simplifying or approximating complex digital circuits to make them smaller, faster, and more energy-efficient, while still maintaining acceptable levels of accuracy.
The key idea behind OPTDTALS is to represent the desired Boolean function (the logical relationship between the circuit's inputs and outputs) using an optimal decision tree. Decision trees are a type of machine learning model that make a series of decisions based on the input values to determine the output. The researchers show that by finding the "optimal" decision tree for a given Boolean function, they can create a compact and accurate approximation of the original circuit.
This approach has several advantages. First, the decision tree models are easy to interpret and understand, making them suitable for hardware implementation in energy-efficient approximate computing systems. Second, the method is designed to efficiently search for the best decision tree representation, allowing it to scale to larger and more complex Boolean functions.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by providing background on approximate logic synthesis and the use of decision trees for this task. The key technical contribution is the OPTDTALS algorithm, which aims to find the optimal decision tree that best represents a given Boolean function.
The OPTDTALS algorithm uses a dynamic programming approach to efficiently search the space of possible decision trees and identify the one that minimizes a given cost function. This cost function takes into account both the accuracy of the decision tree model and its complexity, allowing the researchers to find a good balance between these two competing objectives.
The paper also includes an extensive experimental evaluation of the OPTDTALS approach on a variety of benchmark Boolean functions. The results show that OPTDTALS can produce compact and accurate decision tree models that outperform other state-of-the-art approximate logic synthesis techniques.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and well-designed approach for approximate logic synthesis using optimal decision trees. The use of an efficient dynamic programming algorithm to search the space of possible decision trees is a key strength, as it allows the method to scale to larger and more complex Boolean functions.
One potential limitation of the OPTDTALS approach is that it may be sensitive to the choice of cost function and the relative weights assigned to accuracy and complexity. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that further research could explore more sophisticated cost functions or ways to automatically tune the cost function parameters.
Additionally, while the experimental results are promising, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the hardware implementation of the decision tree models. Further work could investigate the practical challenges and trade-offs involved in deploying these models in real-world approximate computing systems.
Conclusion
The OPTDTALS approach presented in this paper represents an important step forward in the field of approximate logic synthesis. By leveraging optimal decision trees, the method can produce compact and accurate approximations of Boolean functions, which can be valuable for building energy-efficient hardware systems. The efficient algorithmic approach and promising experimental results suggest that OPTDTALS could have a significant impact on the design of future approximate computing technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
OPTDTALS: Approximate Logic Synthesis via Optimal Decision Trees Approach
Hao Hu, Shaowei Cai
The growing interest in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) motivates promising studies of computing optimal Interpretable Machine Learning models, especially decision trees. Such models generally provide optimality in compact size or empirical accuracy. Recent works focus on improving efficiency due to the natural scalability issue. The application of such models to practical problems is quite limited. As an emerging problem in circuit design, Approximate Logic Synthesis (ALS) aims to reduce circuit complexity by sacrificing correctness. Recently, multiple heuristic machine learning methods have been applied in ALS, which learns approximated circuits from samples of input-output pairs. In this paper, we propose a new ALS methodology realizing the approximation via learning optimal decision trees in empirical accuracy. Compared to previous heuristic ALS methods, the guarantee of optimality achieves a more controllable trade-off between circuit complexity and accuracy. Experimental results show clear improvements in our methodology in the quality of approximated designs (circuit complexity and accuracy) compared to the state-of-the-art approaches.
Read more8/23/2024
0
MTLSO: A Multi-Task Learning Approach for Logic Synthesis Optimization
Faezeh Faez, Raika Karimi, Yingxue Zhang, Xing Li, Lei Chen, Mingxuan Yuan, Mahdi Biparva
Electronic Design Automation (EDA) is essential for IC design and has recently benefited from AI-based techniques to improve efficiency. Logic synthesis, a key EDA stage, transforms high-level hardware descriptions into optimized netlists. Recent research has employed machine learning to predict Quality of Results (QoR) for pairs of And-Inverter Graphs (AIGs) and synthesis recipes. However, the severe scarcity of data due to a very limited number of available AIGs results in overfitting, significantly hindering performance. Additionally, the complexity and large number of nodes in AIGs make plain GNNs less effective for learning expressive graph-level representations. To tackle these challenges, we propose MTLSO - a Multi-Task Learning approach for Logic Synthesis Optimization. On one hand, it maximizes the use of limited data by training the model across different tasks. This includes introducing an auxiliary task of binary multi-label graph classification alongside the primary regression task, allowing the model to benefit from diverse supervision sources. On the other hand, we employ a hierarchical graph representation learning strategy to improve the model's capacity for learning expressive graph-level representations of large AIGs, surpassing traditional plain GNNs. Extensive experiments across multiple datasets and against state-of-the-art baselines demonstrate the superiority of our method, achieving an average performance gain of 8.22% for delay and 5.95% for area.
Read more9/11/2024
🎲
0
A Theory of Interpretable Approximations
Marco Bressan, Nicol`o Cesa-Bianchi, Emmanuel Esposito, Yishay Mansour, Shay Moran, Maximilian Thiessen
Can a deep neural network be approximated by a small decision tree based on simple features? This question and its variants are behind the growing demand for machine learning models that are *interpretable* by humans. In this work we study such questions by introducing *interpretable approximations*, a notion that captures the idea of approximating a target concept $c$ by a small aggregation of concepts from some base class $mathcal{H}$. In particular, we consider the approximation of a binary concept $c$ by decision trees based on a simple class $mathcal{H}$ (e.g., of bounded VC dimension), and use the tree depth as a measure of complexity. Our primary contribution is the following remarkable trichotomy. For any given pair of $mathcal{H}$ and $c$, exactly one of these cases holds: (i) $c$ cannot be approximated by $mathcal{H}$ with arbitrary accuracy; (ii) $c$ can be approximated by $mathcal{H}$ with arbitrary accuracy, but there exists no universal rate that bounds the complexity of the approximations as a function of the accuracy; or (iii) there exists a constant $kappa$ that depends only on $mathcal{H}$ and $c$ such that, for *any* data distribution and *any* desired accuracy level, $c$ can be approximated by $mathcal{H}$ with a complexity not exceeding $kappa$. This taxonomy stands in stark contrast to the landscape of supervised classification, which offers a complex array of distribution-free and universally learnable scenarios. We show that, in the case of interpretable approximations, even a slightly nontrivial a-priori guarantee on the complexity of approximations implies approximations with constant (distribution-free and accuracy-free) complexity. We extend our trichotomy to classes $mathcal{H}$ of unbounded VC dimension and give characterizations of interpretability based on the algebra generated by $mathcal{H}$.
Read more6/18/2024
0
A Uniform Language to Explain Decision Trees
Marcelo Arenas, Pablo Barcelo, Diego Bustamante, Jose Caraball, Bernardo Subercaseaux
The formal XAI community has studied a plethora of interpretability queries aiming to understand the classifications made by decision trees. However, a more uniform understanding of what questions we can hope to answer about these models, traditionally deemed to be easily interpretable, has remained elusive. In an initial attempt to understand uniform languages for interpretability, Arenas et al. (2021) proposed FOIL, a logic for explaining black-box ML models, and showed that it can express a variety of interpretability queries. However, we show that FOIL is limited in two important senses: (i) it is not expressive enough to capture some crucial queries, and (ii) its model agnostic nature results in a high computational complexity for decision trees. In this paper, we carefully craft two fragments of first-order logic that allow for efficiently interpreting decision trees: Q-DT-FOIL and its optimization variant OPT-DT-FOIL. We show that our proposed logics can express not only a variety of interpretability queries considered by previous literature, but also elegantly allows users to specify different objectives the sought explanations should optimize for. Using finite model-theoretic techniques, we show that the different ingredients of Q-DT-FOIL are necessary for its expressiveness, and yet that queries in Q-DT-FOIL can be evaluated with a polynomial number of queries to a SAT solver, as well as their optimization versions in OPT-DT-FOIL. Besides our theoretical results, we provide a SAT-based implementation of the evaluation for OPT-DT-FOIL that is performant on industry-size decision trees.
Read more5/22/2024