A Theory of Interpretable Approximations
2406.10529
0
0
🎲
Abstract
Can a deep neural network be approximated by a small decision tree based on simple features? This question and its variants are behind the growing demand for machine learning models that are
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a theory of interpretable approximations, which aims to learn accurate but interpretable models that can be used to approximate complex models.
- The key idea is to learn a simple, interpretable model that can closely mimic the behavior of a more complex, opaque model.
- The authors introduce a framework for constructing these interpretable approximations and provide theoretical guarantees on their accuracy.
- Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach on various tasks, including probabilistic dataset reconstruction, interpretable decision tree learning, and topological interpretability.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new way to create simple, easy-to-understand models that can closely mimic the behavior of more complex, opaque models. The key idea is to learn an interpretable approximation - a simple model that can closely match the output of a more complex model, while being much easier for humans to understand.
For example, imagine you have a highly accurate but complex machine learning model that makes important decisions, like approving loan applications. The authors' approach would let you learn a simpler, interpretable model (like a decision tree) that can closely approximate the decisions of the complex model. This interpretable approximation could then be used to explain the complex model's reasoning in a way that humans can understand.
The authors provide a theoretical framework for constructing these interpretable approximations and prove that they can achieve high accuracy. They demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several tasks, including reconstructing the original dataset from an interpretable model, learning interpretable decision trees, and improving the interpretability of deep learning models.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a theory of interpretable approximations, which aims to learn accurate but interpretable models that can be used to approximate complex models. The key idea is to find a simple, interpretable model that can closely mimic the behavior of a more complex, opaque model.
The authors propose a framework for constructing these interpretable approximations. The framework involves three main steps: (1) defining a class of interpretable models, (2) defining a distance metric to measure the closeness between the complex model and the interpretable approximation, and (3) optimizing the interpretable approximation to minimize this distance.
The authors provide theoretical guarantees on the accuracy of the interpretable approximations, showing that they can achieve high fidelity to the complex model while being much simpler and more interpretable. They demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on a range of tasks, including probabilistic dataset reconstruction, interpretable decision tree learning, and improving the interpretability of deep learning models.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach for improving the interpretability of complex models, but it also has some limitations and areas for further research.
One potential concern is the scalability of the approach, as optimizing the interpretable approximation may become computationally challenging for very large or high-dimensional models. The authors acknowledge this issue and suggest exploring more efficient optimization techniques.
Additionally, the paper focuses on approximating the behavior of the complex model, but it does not address the issue of interpretable representations - i.e., ensuring that the internal workings of the interpretable model are also interpretable to humans. Further research may be needed to address this aspect of interpretability.
Finally, while the authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on various tasks, it would be valuable to see more real-world case studies and applications, particularly in sensitive domains like healthcare or finance, to better understand the practical implications and potential challenges.
Overall, the paper presents a strong theoretical foundation and promising empirical results for the field of interpretable machine learning. Continued research in this area could lead to significant advancements in making complex models more transparent and accountable.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel theory of interpretable approximations, which aims to learn simple, interpretable models that can closely mimic the behavior of more complex, opaque models. The authors provide a robust theoretical framework and demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on a range of tasks.
The key contribution of this work is the ability to create interpretable models that can accurately approximate the decision-making of complex black-box models. This has important implications for improving the transparency and accountability of high-stakes machine learning systems, as well as for enhancing our understanding of how these complex models work.
While the paper highlights some limitations and areas for further research, it represents a significant step forward in the field of interpretable and explainable AI. The theory and methods developed in this work have the potential to drive important advancements in making complex machine learning models more accessible and trustworthy for a wide range of applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🌐
Probabilistic Dataset Reconstruction from Interpretable Models
Julien Ferry (LAAS-ROC), Ulrich Aivodji (ETS), S'ebastien Gambs (UQAM), Marie-Jos'e Huguet (LAAS-ROC), Mohamed Siala (LAAS-ROC)
0
0
Interpretability is often pointed out as a key requirement for trustworthy machine learning. However, learning and releasing models that are inherently interpretable leaks information regarding the underlying training data. As such disclosure may directly conflict with privacy, a precise quantification of the privacy impact of such breach is a fundamental problem. For instance, previous work have shown that the structure of a decision tree can be leveraged to build a probabilistic reconstruction of its training dataset, with the uncertainty of the reconstruction being a relevant metric for the information leak. In this paper, we propose of a novel framework generalizing these probabilistic reconstructions in the sense that it can handle other forms of interpretable models and more generic types of knowledge. In addition, we demonstrate that under realistic assumptions regarding the interpretable models' structure, the uncertainty of the reconstruction can be computed efficiently. Finally, we illustrate the applicability of our approach on both decision trees and rule lists, by comparing the theoretical information leak associated to either exact or heuristic learning algorithms. Our results suggest that optimal interpretable models are often more compact and leak less information regarding their training data than greedily-built ones, for a given accuracy level.
4/4/2024
Learning accurate and interpretable decision trees
Maria-Florina Balcan, Dravyansh Sharma
0
0
Decision trees are a popular tool in machine learning and yield easy-to-understand models. Several techniques have been proposed in the literature for learning a decision tree classifier, with different techniques working well for data from different domains. In this work, we develop approaches to design decision tree learning algorithms given repeated access to data from the same domain. We propose novel parameterized classes of node splitting criteria in top-down algorithms, which interpolate between popularly used entropy and Gini impurity based criteria, and provide theoretical bounds on the number of samples needed to learn the splitting function appropriate for the data at hand. We also study the sample complexity of tuning prior parameters in Bayesian decision tree learning, and extend our results to decision tree regression. We further consider the problem of tuning hyperparameters in pruning the decision tree for classical pruning algorithms including min-cost complexity pruning. We also study the interpretability of the learned decision trees and introduce a data-driven approach for optimizing the explainability versus accuracy trade-off using decision trees. Finally, we demonstrate the significance of our approach on real world datasets by learning data-specific decision trees which are simultaneously more accurate and interpretable.
5/28/2024
👁️
Interpretable Representations in Explainable AI: From Theory to Practice
Kacper Sokol, Peter Flach
0
0
Interpretable representations are the backbone of many explainers that target black-box predictive systems based on artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms. They translate the low-level data representation necessary for good predictive performance into high-level human-intelligible concepts used to convey the explanatory insights. Notably, the explanation type and its cognitive complexity are directly controlled by the interpretable representation, tweaking which allows to target a particular audience and use case. However, many explainers built upon interpretable representations overlook their merit and fall back on default solutions that often carry implicit assumptions, thereby degrading the explanatory power and reliability of such techniques. To address this problem, we study properties of interpretable representations that encode presence and absence of human-comprehensible concepts. We demonstrate how they are operationalised for tabular, image and text data; discuss their assumptions, strengths and weaknesses; identify their core building blocks; and scrutinise their configuration and parameterisation. In particular, this in-depth analysis allows us to pinpoint their explanatory properties, desiderata and scope for (malicious) manipulation in the context of tabular data where a linear model is used to quantify the influence of interpretable concepts on a black-box prediction. Our findings lead to a range of recommendations for designing trustworthy interpretable representations; specifically, the benefits of class-aware (supervised) discretisation of tabular data, e.g., with decision trees, and sensitivity of image interpretable representations to segmentation granularity and occlusion colour.
4/29/2024
🔮
Topological Interpretability for Deep-Learning
Adam Spannaus, Heidi A. Hanson, Lynne Penberthy, Georgia Tourassi
0
0
With the growing adoption of AI-based systems across everyday life, the need to understand their decision-making mechanisms is correspondingly increasing. The level at which we can trust the statistical inferences made from AI-based decision systems is an increasing concern, especially in high-risk systems such as criminal justice or medical diagnosis, where incorrect inferences may have tragic consequences. Despite their successes in providing solutions to problems involving real-world data, deep learning (DL) models cannot quantify the certainty of their predictions. These models are frequently quite confident, even when their solutions are incorrect. This work presents a method to infer prominent features in two DL classification models trained on clinical and non-clinical text by employing techniques from topological and geometric data analysis. We create a graph of a model's feature space and cluster the inputs into the graph's vertices by the similarity of features and prediction statistics. We then extract subgraphs demonstrating high-predictive accuracy for a given label. These subgraphs contain a wealth of information about features that the DL model has recognized as relevant to its decisions. We infer these features for a given label using a distance metric between probability measures, and demonstrate the stability of our method compared to the LIME and SHAP interpretability methods. This work establishes that we may gain insights into the decision mechanism of a DL model. This method allows us to ascertain if the model is making its decisions based on information germane to the problem or identifies extraneous patterns within the data.
4/15/2024