OptiGrad: A Fair and more Efficient Price Elasticity Optimization via a Gradient Based Learning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a new gradient-based algorithm called OptiGrad for optimizing price elasticity in a fair and efficient manner.
- The authors address issues with existing price optimization methods, such as unfairness and inefficiency.
- OptiGrad aims to provide a more balanced approach that considers both revenue maximization and fairness to consumers.
Plain English Explanation
When businesses set prices for their products or services, they often use optimization algorithms to try to maximize their revenue. However, these algorithms can sometimes lead to unfair or inefficient results, where certain customers end up paying much more than others for similar products.
The OptiGrad algorithm proposed in this paper aims to address these issues. It uses a gradient-based approach to optimize prices in a way that balances revenue maximization with fairness to consumers. The key idea is to consider not just the total revenue, but also how the pricing impacts different customer segments in a more equitable way.
The authors show that OptiGrad can achieve higher revenue than existing price optimization methods, while also ensuring that the price differences between customers are more reasonable and justifiable. This helps create a better overall experience for consumers, while still allowing businesses to maximize their profits.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents the OptiGrad algorithm, which is a gradient-based optimization method for setting prices in a way that considers both revenue maximization and fairness to consumers.
The authors first define the price optimization problem, where the goal is to find prices that maximize total revenue while also minimizing differences in prices paid by different customer segments. They show how this can be formulated as a constrained optimization problem.
To solve this problem, OptiGrad uses a gradient-based approach that iteratively updates the prices. The key innovation is in how the gradients are computed - instead of just considering the impact on total revenue, OptiGrad also factors in the fairness of the pricing across different customer groups.
The paper includes a theoretical analysis of OptiGrad, proving that it converges to an optimal solution under certain assumptions. The authors also demonstrate the algorithm's effectiveness through experiments on real-world datasets, showing that it outperforms existing price optimization methods in terms of both revenue and fairness.
Critical Analysis
The OptiGrad algorithm represents an important advance in price optimization by explicitly considering fairness alongside revenue maximization. This is a valuable contribution, as many existing price optimization methods can lead to significant disparities in prices paid by different customers, which is often seen as unfair and undesirable.
That said, the paper does acknowledge some limitations of the approach. For example, the theoretical analysis assumes certain simplifying conditions, such as linear demand functions, that may not always hold in practice. Additionally, the experiments are conducted on relatively small datasets, and it's unclear how well the algorithm would scale to larger, more complex real-world scenarios.
Further research could explore relaxing some of the assumptions, investigating the algorithm's performance on a wider range of datasets, and examining how it might interact with other factors like customer segmentation or personalization. It would also be interesting to see how OptiGrad compares to other fairness-aware optimization techniques, such as those discussed in the Universal Online Learning with Gradient Variations and Adaptive Doubly Optimal No-Regret Learning papers.
Overall, the OptiGrad algorithm represents a promising step towards more ethical and equitable price optimization, and the ideas presented in this paper could have important implications for businesses, consumers, and society as a whole.
Conclusion
The OptiGrad algorithm proposed in this paper offers a new approach to price optimization that aims to balance revenue maximization with fairness to consumers. By incorporating fairness considerations directly into the optimization process, OptiGrad can achieve higher revenues while also ensuring more reasonable and justifiable price differences between customer segments.
This is a valuable contribution, as many existing price optimization methods can lead to unfair and inefficient outcomes. The Differentially Private Non-Convex Optimization and Novel Decision Fusion Approach papers also explore related issues in this space.
While the OptiGrad algorithm still has some limitations, the ideas presented in this paper could have important implications for businesses, consumers, and society as a whole. By developing more ethical and equitable pricing strategies, companies can create better experiences for their customers while still maximizing their own profitability.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
OptiGrad: A Fair and more Efficient Price Elasticity Optimization via a Gradient Based Learning
Vincent Grari, Marcin Detyniecki
This paper presents a novel approach to optimizing profit margins in non-life insurance markets through a gradient descent-based method, targeting three key objectives: 1) maximizing profit margins, 2) ensuring conversion rates, and 3) enforcing fairness criteria such as demographic parity (DP). Traditional pricing optimization, which heavily lean on linear and semi definite programming, encounter challenges in balancing profitability and fairness. These challenges become especially pronounced in situations that necessitate continuous rate adjustments and the incorporation of fairness criteria. Specifically, indirect Ratebook optimization, a widely-used method for new business price setting, relies on predictor models such as XGBoost or GLMs/GAMs to estimate on downstream individually optimized prices. However, this strategy is prone to sequential errors and struggles to effectively manage optimizations for continuous rate scenarios. In practice, to save time actuaries frequently opt for optimization within discrete intervals (e.g., range of [-20%, +20%] with fix increments) leading to approximate estimations. Moreover, to circumvent infeasible solutions they often use relaxed constraints leading to suboptimal pricing strategies. The reverse-engineered nature of traditional models complicates the enforcement of fairness and can lead to biased outcomes. Our method addresses these challenges by employing a direct optimization strategy in the continuous space of rates and by embedding fairness through an adversarial predictor model. This innovation not only reduces sequential errors and simplifies the complexities found in traditional models but also directly integrates fairness measures into the commercial premium calculation. We demonstrate improved margin performance and stronger enforcement of fairness highlighting the critical need to evolve existing pricing strategies.
Read more4/17/2024
🛠️
0
$epsilon$-Policy Gradient for Online Pricing
Lukasz Szpruch, Tanut Treetanthiploet, Yufei Zhang
Combining model-based and model-free reinforcement learning approaches, this paper proposes and analyzes an $epsilon$-policy gradient algorithm for the online pricing learning task. The algorithm extends $epsilon$-greedy algorithm by replacing greedy exploitation with gradient descent step and facilitates learning via model inference. We optimize the regret of the proposed algorithm by quantifying the exploration cost in terms of the exploration probability $epsilon$ and the exploitation cost in terms of the gradient descent optimization and gradient estimation errors. The algorithm achieves an expected regret of order $mathcal{O}(sqrt{T})$ (up to a logarithmic factor) over $T$ trials.
Read more5/7/2024
🛠️
0
Faster Margin Maximization Rates for Generic and Adversarially Robust Optimization Methods
Guanghui Wang, Zihao Hu, Claudio Gentile, Vidya Muthukumar, Jacob Abernethy
First-order optimization methods tend to inherently favor certain solutions over others when minimizing an underdetermined training objective that has multiple global optima. This phenomenon, known as implicit bias, plays a critical role in understanding the generalization capabilities of optimization algorithms. Recent research has revealed that in separable binary classification tasks gradient-descent-based methods exhibit an implicit bias for the $ell_2$-maximal margin classifier. Similarly, generic optimization methods, such as mirror descent and steepest descent, have been shown to converge to maximal margin classifiers defined by alternative geometries. While gradient-descent-based algorithms provably achieve fast implicit bias rates, corresponding rates in the literature for generic optimization methods are relatively slow. To address this limitation, we present a series of state-of-the-art implicit bias rates for mirror descent and steepest descent algorithms. Our primary technique involves transforming a generic optimization algorithm into an online optimization dynamic that solves a regularized bilinear game, providing a unified framework for analyzing the implicit bias of various optimization methods. Our accelerated rates are derived by leveraging the regret bounds of online learning algorithms within this game framework. We then show the flexibility of this framework by analyzing the implicit bias in adversarial training, and again obtain significantly improved convergence rates.
Read more4/9/2024
🛸
0
Rule Generation for Classification: Scalability, Interpretability, and Fairness
Tabea E. Rober, Adia C. Lumadjeng, M. Hakan Akyuz, c{S}. .Ilker Birbil
We introduce a new rule-based optimization method for classification with constraints. The proposed method leverages column generation for linear programming, and hence, is scalable to large datasets. The resulting pricing subproblem is shown to be NP-Hard. We recourse to a decision tree-based heuristic and solve a proxy pricing subproblem for acceleration. The method returns a set of rules along with their optimal weights indicating the importance of each rule for learning. We address interpretability and fairness by assigning cost coefficients to the rules and introducing additional constraints. In particular, we focus on local interpretability and generalize separation criterion in fairness to multiple sensitive attributes and classes. We test the performance of the proposed methodology on a collection of datasets and present a case study to elaborate on its different aspects. The proposed rule-based learning method exhibits a good compromise between local interpretability and fairness on the one side, and accuracy on the other side.
Read more5/14/2024