Rule Generation for Classification: Scalability, Interpretability, and Fairness
2104.10751
0
0
🛸
Abstract
We introduce a new rule-based optimization method for classification with constraints. The proposed method leverages column generation for linear programming, and hence, is scalable to large datasets. The resulting pricing subproblem is shown to be NP-Hard. We recourse to a decision tree-based heuristic and solve a proxy pricing subproblem for acceleration. The method returns a set of rules along with their optimal weights indicating the importance of each rule for learning. We address interpretability and fairness by assigning cost coefficients to the rules and introducing additional constraints. In particular, we focus on local interpretability and generalize separation criterion in fairness to multiple sensitive attributes and classes. We test the performance of the proposed methodology on a collection of datasets and present a case study to elaborate on its different aspects. The proposed rule-based learning method exhibits a good compromise between local interpretability and fairness on the one side, and accuracy on the other side.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper introduces a new rule-based optimization method for classification with constraints.
- The method uses column generation for linear programming, making it scalable to large datasets.
- The pricing subproblem is NP-Hard, so a decision tree-based heuristic is used to solve a proxy subproblem for acceleration.
- The method returns a set of rules with optimal weights, indicating the importance of each rule for learning.
- Interpretability and fairness are addressed by assigning cost coefficients to the rules and introducing additional constraints.
- The method focuses on local interpretability and generalizes fairness criteria to multiple sensitive attributes and classes.
- The proposed method exhibits a good compromise between local interpretability, fairness, and accuracy.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new way to train machine learning models that can explain their decisions and treat people fairly. The key idea is to use a set of rules, where each rule has a weight that shows how important it is. The method finds the best set of rules and their weights by solving an optimization problem.
To make this method work for large datasets, the authors use a technique called column generation from linear programming. This makes the method scalable and efficient.
The authors also address two important issues: interpretability and fairness. For interpretability, they assign a "cost" to each rule, which indicates how easy it is to understand. For fairness, they introduce additional constraints to ensure the model treats people from different groups (e.g., different genders or races) equally.
The method is tested on various datasets, and the authors show that it can achieve a good balance between accuracy, interpretability, and fairness.
Technical Explanation
The proposed method uses column generation for linear programming to solve the classification problem with constraints. This makes the method scalable to large datasets. The key challenge is that the resulting pricing subproblem is NP-Hard. To address this, the authors use a decision tree-based heuristic to solve a proxy pricing subproblem, which allows for faster computation.
The output of the method is a set of rules, where each rule has an associated weight. These weights indicate the importance of each rule for the classification task. The authors address interpretability by assigning cost coefficients to the rules, which reflect how easy they are to understand. For fairness, they introduce additional constraints to ensure the model treats different groups (e.g., different genders or races) equally, generalizing the separation criterion to multiple sensitive attributes and classes.
The authors test the proposed method on a variety of datasets and present a case study to illustrate its different aspects. The results show that the method can achieve a good balance between local interpretability, fairness, and accuracy, as evidenced by the trade-offs observed in prior work on these competing objectives.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a novel and scalable approach to building interpretable and fair machine learning models. The use of column generation for linear programming is a clever way to handle large datasets, and the decision tree-based heuristic for the pricing subproblem is a practical solution to the NP-Hard problem.
However, the paper does not discuss the potential limitations of the method. For example, it is unclear how the method would perform in cases where the rules have complex interactions or when the dataset has a high degree of feature correlation. Additionally, the authors do not address the potential for unintended biases to be introduced through the rule selection process.
Further research could explore the robustness of the method to different data distributions and the development of techniques to mitigate unintended biases in the rules. Additionally, it would be valuable to compare the proposed method to other interpretable and fair machine learning approaches to better understand its strengths and weaknesses.
Conclusion
The paper introduces a new rule-based optimization method for classification with constraints that addresses the important issues of interpretability and fairness. By using column generation for linear programming, the method is scalable to large datasets, and the decision tree-based heuristic provides a practical solution to the NP-Hard pricing subproblem.
The proposed method exhibits a good compromise between local interpretability, fairness, and accuracy, making it a promising approach for building machine learning models that are both effective and transparent. As the field of machine learning continues to grapple with the challenges of interpretability and fairness, this work represents a valuable contribution to the ongoing research in this area.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Enabling Regional Explainability by Automatic and Model-agnostic Rule Extraction
Yu Chen, Tianyu Cui, Alexander Capstick, Nan Fletcher-Loyd, Payam Barnaghi
0
0
In Explainable AI, rule extraction translates model knowledge into logical rules, such as IF-THEN statements, crucial for understanding patterns learned by black-box models. This could significantly aid in fields like disease diagnosis, disease progression estimation, or drug discovery. However, such application domains often contain imbalanced data, with the class of interest underrepresented. Existing methods inevitably compromise the performance of rules for the minor class to maximise the overall performance. As the first attempt in this field, we propose a model-agnostic approach for extracting rules from specific subgroups of data, featuring automatic rule generation for numerical features. This method enhances the regional explainability of machine learning models and offers wider applicability compared to existing methods. We additionally introduce a new method for selecting features to compose rules, reducing computational costs in high-dimensional spaces. Experiments across various datasets and models demonstrate the effectiveness of our methods.
6/27/2024
New!A Unified Approach to Extract Intepretable Rules from Tree Ensembles via Integer Programming
Lorenzo Bonasera, Emilio Carrizosa
0
0
Tree ensemble methods represent a popular machine learning model, known for their effectiveness in supervised classification and regression tasks. Their performance derives from aggregating predictions of multiple decision trees, which are renowned for their interpretability properties. However, tree ensemble methods do not reliably exhibit interpretable output. Our work aims to extract an optimized list of rules from a trained tree ensemble, providing the user with a condensed, interpretable model that retains most of the predictive power of the full model. Our approach consists of solving a clean and neat set partitioning problem formulated through Integer Programming. The proposed method works with either tabular or time series data, for both classification and regression tasks, and does not require parameter tuning under the most common setting. Through rigorous computational experiments, we offer statistically significant evidence that our method is competitive with other rule extraction methods and effectively handles time series.
7/2/2024
📈
An Incremental MaxSAT-based Model to Learn Interpretable and Balanced Classification Rules
Ant^onio Carlos Souza Ferreira J'unior, Thiago Alves Rocha
0
0
The increasing advancements in the field of machine learning have led to the development of numerous applications that effectively address a wide range of problems with accurate predictions. However, in certain cases, accuracy alone may not be sufficient. Many real-world problems also demand explanations and interpretability behind the predictions. One of the most popular interpretable models that are classification rules. This work aims to propose an incremental model for learning interpretable and balanced rules based on MaxSAT, called IMLIB. This new model was based on two other approaches, one based on SAT and the other on MaxSAT. The one based on SAT limits the size of each generated rule, making it possible to balance them. We suggest that such a set of rules seem more natural to be understood compared to a mixture of large and small rules. The approach based on MaxSAT, called IMLI, presents a technique to increase performance that involves learning a set of rules by incrementally applying the model in a dataset. Finally, IMLIB and IMLI are compared using diverse databases. IMLIB obtained results comparable to IMLI in terms of accuracy, generating more balanced rules with smaller sizes.
4/30/2024
Predicting Fairness of ML Software Configuration
Salvador Robles Herrera, Verya Monjezi, Vladik Kreinovich, Ashutosh Trivedi, Saeid Tizpaz-Niari
0
0
This paper investigates the relationships between hyperparameters of machine learning and fairness. Data-driven solutions are increasingly used in critical socio-technical applications where ensuring fairness is important. Rather than explicitly encoding decision logic via control and data structures, the ML developers provide input data, perform some pre-processing, choose ML algorithms, and tune hyperparameters (HPs) to infer a program that encodes the decision logic. Prior works report that the selection of HPs can significantly influence fairness. However, tuning HPs to find an ideal trade-off between accuracy, precision, and fairness has remained an expensive and tedious task. Can we predict fairness of HP configuration for a given dataset? Are the predictions robust to distribution shifts? We focus on group fairness notions and investigate the HP space of 5 training algorithms. We first find that tree regressors and XGBoots significantly outperformed deep neural networks and support vector machines in accurately predicting the fairness of HPs. When predicting the fairness of ML hyperparameters under temporal distribution shift, the tree regressors outperforms the other algorithms with reasonable accuracy. However, the precision depends on the ML training algorithm, dataset, and protected attributes. For example, the tree regressor model was robust for training data shift from 2014 to 2018 on logistic regression and discriminant analysis HPs with sex as the protected attribute; but not for race and other training algorithms. Our method provides a sound framework to efficiently perform fine-tuning of ML training algorithms and understand the relationships between HPs and fairness.
7/2/2024