Optimal and Bounded Suboptimal Any-Angle Multi-agent Pathfinding

Overview

• This paper explores an approach to solving multi-agent pathfinding (MAPF) problems where each agent can move between any pair of locations, as long as the path between them does not collide with obstacles.
• This type of pathfinding is known as "any-angle" pathfinding, in contrast to the more common grid-based pathfinding where agents can only move along predefined grid edges.
• The authors present the first optimal any-angle MAPF algorithm, which combines two existing techniques: Continuous Conflict-based Search (CCBS) and an optimal any-angle variant of Safe Interval Path Planning (TO-AA-SIPP).
• However, the straightforward combination of these methods scales poorly due to the high branching factor of any-angle pathfinding.
• To address this, the authors adapt two techniques from classical grid-based MAPF - Disjoint Splitting and Multi-Constraints - to the any-angle setting.
• Experimental results show these adaptations enable solving over 30% more problems than the vanilla CCBS + TO-AA-SIPP approach.
• The authors also present a bounded-suboptimal variant of their algorithm, which allows trading runtime for solution cost in a controlled manner.

Plain English Explanation

In many real-world scenarios, such as robot navigation or video game pathfinding, we need to plan paths for multiple agents (e.g., robots or characters) to reach their destinations without colliding with each other or with obstacles in the environment. This is known as the multi-agent pathfinding (MAPF) problem.

Traditionally, MAPF algorithms have assumed that agents can only move along a predefined grid of locations, like a checkerboard. However, in many cases, agents should be able to move between any pair of locations, as long as the straight line between them doesn't intersect with an obstacle. This is called "any-angle" pathfinding.

The authors of this paper present a new algorithm for solving any-angle MAPF problems. Their approach combines two existing techniques: Continuous Conflict-based Search (CCBS) and an optimal any-angle variant of Safe Interval Path Planning (TO-AA-SIPP).

While this combination works in theory, the authors found that it scales poorly in practice because any-angle pathfinding leads to search trees with a very large branching factor. To address this, they adapted two techniques from classical grid-based MAPF - Disjoint Splitting and Multi-Constraints - to the any-angle setting.

These adaptations enabled the authors' algorithm to solve over 30% more problems than the vanilla CCBS + TO-AA-SIPP approach. The authors also developed a version of their algorithm that trades off solution quality (optimality) for faster runtime, allowing users to choose the right balance for their needs.

Technical Explanation

The core of the authors' approach is the combination of two existing techniques: Continuous Conflict-based Search (CCBS) and an optimal any-angle variant of Safe Interval Path Planning (TO-AA-SIPP).

CCBS is a search-based algorithm for solving MAPF problems, where agents' paths are planned sequentially, and conflicts between agents' paths are resolved as they are detected. TO-AA-SIPP is an any-angle pathfinding algorithm that can find optimal paths between any pair of locations, as long as the path does not intersect with obstacles.

By combining CCBS and TO-AA-SIPP, the authors obtain an optimal any-angle MAPF algorithm. However, this straightforward combination suffers from poor scalability due to the high branching factor of any-angle pathfinding.

To address this, the authors adapt two techniques from classical grid-based MAPF to the any-angle setting:

1. Disjoint Splitting: This technique partitions the set of agents into disjoint subsets, allowing the algorithm to plan paths for each subset independently, reducing the overall complexity.

2. Multi-Constraints: This approach identifies and resolves conflicts between agents' paths proactively, rather than reactively as in the original CCBS algorithm. This reduces the number of conflicts that need to be resolved during planning.

The authors' experimental results show that these adaptations enable their algorithm to solve over 30% more problems than the vanilla CCBS + TO-AA-SIPP approach.

Additionally, the authors present a bounded-suboptimal variant of their algorithm, which can trade off solution cost for reduced runtime. This allows users to choose the appropriate balance between solution quality and computational efficiency for their specific needs.

Critical Analysis

The authors' work represents an important step forward in solving MAPF problems with any-angle pathfinding, which is a more realistic and flexible setting than the traditional grid-based approach. By adapting techniques from classical MAPF to the any-angle domain, the authors have developed an algorithm that can scale to larger and more complex problem instances.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations and areas for further research:

1. Obstacle Representation: The authors assume that the environment is represented as a set of polygonal obstacles. In practice, the representation of obstacles can have a significant impact on the performance of any-angle pathfinding algorithms. Exploring alternative obstacle representations, such as signed distance fields, could be a fruitful area for future work.

2. Heterogeneous Agents: The current algorithm assumes that all agents have the same capabilities and constraints. Extending the approach to handle agents with different sizes, speeds, or other characteristics would broaden its applicability to real-world scenarios.

3. Dynamic Environments: The paper does not consider environments where obstacles or agent goals may change over time. Developing any-angle MAPF algorithms that can handle dynamic environments would be a valuable contribution.

4. Completeness and Optimality: While the authors' algorithm is optimal for the any-angle MAPF problem, it would be interesting to explore alternative approaches that may offer different trade-offs between solution quality, computation time, and completeness.

Despite these potential limitations, the authors' work represents a significant advancement in the field of multi-agent pathfinding, and their techniques could have important applications in robotics, video games, and other domains where flexible and efficient path planning is required.

Conclusion

This paper presents a new algorithm for solving multi-agent pathfinding (MAPF) problems in an "any-angle" setting, where agents can move between any pair of locations as long as the path between them does not intersect with obstacles. The authors combine two existing techniques, Continuous Conflict-based Search (CCBS) and an optimal any-angle variant of Safe Interval Path Planning (TO-AA-SIPP), and adapt two classical MAPF techniques, Disjoint Splitting and Multi-Constraints, to the any-angle domain.

The resulting algorithm is able to solve over 30% more problems than the vanilla CCBS + TO-AA-SIPP approach, demonstrating the value of these adaptations. The authors also introduce a bounded-suboptimal variant of their algorithm, which allows users to trade off solution quality for faster runtime as needed.

This work represents an important step forward in MAPF research, as it addresses the more realistic and flexible any-angle pathfinding scenario. The techniques developed in this paper could have significant implications for a wide range of applications, from robot navigation to video game pathfinding, where efficient and adaptive path planning is critical.