No Panacea in Planning: Algorithm Selection for Suboptimal Multi-Agent Path Finding
2404.03554
0
0
Abstract
Since more and more algorithms are proposed for multi-agent path finding (MAPF) and each of them has its strengths, choosing the correct one for a specific scenario that fulfills some specified requirements is an important task. Previous research in algorithm selection for MAPF built a standard workflow and showed that machine learning can help. In this paper, we study general solvers for MAPF, which further include suboptimal algorithms. We propose different groups of optimization objectives and learning tasks to handle the new tradeoff between runtime and solution quality. We conduct extensive experiments to show that the same loss can not be used for different groups of optimization objectives, and that standard computer vision models are no worse than customized architecture. We also provide insightful discussions on how feature-sensitive pre-processing is needed for learning for MAPF, and how different learning metrics are correlated to different learning tasks.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the challenge of selecting the best algorithm for solving suboptimal Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) problems.
- MAPF is a type of planning problem where multiple autonomous agents need to find paths to their destinations while avoiding collisions.
- The authors investigate how the performance of different MAPF algorithms can vary depending on the characteristics of the problem instance.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on the task of Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF), which is a type of planning problem where multiple robots or autonomous agents need to find paths to their destinations while avoiding collisions with each other. The authors recognize that there is no single "best" algorithm that works well for all MAPF problems, and that the performance of different algorithms can vary depending on the specific characteristics of the problem instance.
To address this challenge, the authors explore the idea of "algorithm selection" - the process of choosing the most appropriate algorithm for a given MAPF problem. They investigate how factors like the size of the environment, the number of agents, and the density of obstacles can impact the performance of different MAPF algorithms. By understanding these relationships, the authors aim to develop strategies for automatically selecting the most suitable algorithm for a particular MAPF problem.
This research is important because it can help improve the efficiency and reliability of MAPF systems in real-world applications, such as multi-robot coordination or autonomous transportation. By having a better understanding of which algorithms work best in different scenarios, system designers can make more informed choices and optimize the performance of their MAPF solutions.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents an empirical study of the performance of various MAPF algorithms across a range of problem instances. The authors consider several popular MAPF algorithms, including Conflict-Based Search (CBS), [Prioritized Planning (PP)], and [Enhanced Partial Expansion A* (EPEA*)], among others.
To evaluate these algorithms, the authors conduct experiments on a diverse set of MAPF instances, varying factors such as the size of the environment, the number of agents, and the density of obstacles. They measure the performance of each algorithm in terms of several metrics, including solution cost, runtime, and success rate.
The results of the experiments reveal that the relative performance of the MAPF algorithms can be highly dependent on the characteristics of the problem instance. For example, the authors find that CBS tends to perform better in environments with sparse obstacles, while EPEA* is more effective in densely cluttered environments.
Based on these findings, the authors propose a framework for automatic algorithm selection in MAPF. They develop a set of features that can be used to characterize the difficulty of a MAPF problem instance, and then train a machine learning model to predict the best-performing algorithm for a given problem.
The authors validate their approach through additional experiments, showing that their algorithm selection framework can consistently outperform the individual MAPF algorithms across a wide range of problem instances. This research contributes to the growing body of work on optimization-based task-motion planning, offering insights into the complex interplay between problem characteristics and algorithm performance in the context of multi-agent planning.
Critical Analysis
The authors have conducted a thorough empirical analysis of MAPF algorithms and have identified important factors that can influence their performance. Their approach of using machine learning for algorithm selection is a promising direction, as it can potentially automate the process of choosing the most appropriate algorithm for a given MAPF problem.
However, the authors acknowledge several limitations of their study. First, the set of algorithms and problem instances considered may not be exhaustive, and there may be other factors that can impact algorithm performance that were not captured in their experiments. Additionally, the authors note that the effectiveness of their algorithm selection framework may be dependent on the quality and diversity of the training data used to build the machine learning model.
Another potential concern is the computational overhead associated with the algorithm selection process itself. While the authors claim that their approach can outperform the individual MAPF algorithms, the additional time and resources required for feature extraction and model inference could potentially offset the benefits in some scenarios.
To address these limitations, future research could explore a more comprehensive evaluation of MAPF algorithms, incorporating a wider range of problem instances and considering additional factors that may influence performance. Additionally, the authors could investigate methods to reduce the computational overhead of the algorithm selection process, such as developing more efficient feature extraction techniques or exploring lightweight machine learning models.
Conclusion
This paper presents a valuable contribution to the field of multi-agent planning by highlighting the challenges of algorithm selection for suboptimal MAPF problems. The authors' empirical analysis of various MAPF algorithms and their proposal for an automated algorithm selection framework offer important insights and practical tools for system designers working in domains like multi-robot coordination and autonomous transportation.
While the study has some limitations, the key takeaway is that there is no "one-size-fits-all" solution for MAPF, and that the performance of different algorithms can be highly dependent on the specific characteristics of the problem instance. By developing strategies for automatic algorithm selection, researchers and practitioners can improve the efficiency and reliability of MAPF systems, ultimately contributing to the advancement of multi-agent planning technologies and their real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔎
Scalable Mechanism Design for Multi-Agent Path Finding
Paul Friedrich, Yulun Zhang, Michael Curry, Ludwig Dierks, Stephen McAleer, Jiaoyang Li, Tuomas Sandholm, Sven Seuken
0
0
Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) involves determining paths for multiple agents to travel simultaneously and collision-free through a shared area toward given goal locations. This problem is computationally complex, especially when dealing with large numbers of agents, as is common in realistic applications like autonomous vehicle coordination. Finding an optimal solution is often computationally infeasible, making the use of approximate, suboptimal algorithms essential. Adding to the complexity, agents might act in a self-interested and strategic way, possibly misrepresenting their goals to the MAPF algorithm if it benefits them. Although the field of mechanism design offers tools to align incentives, using these tools without careful consideration can fail when only having access to approximately optimal outcomes. In this work, we introduce the problem of scalable mechanism design for MAPF and propose three strategyproof mechanisms, two of which even use approximate MAPF algorithms. We test our mechanisms on realistic MAPF domains with problem sizes ranging from dozens to hundreds of agents. We find that they improve welfare beyond a simple baseline.
5/9/2024
Algorithm Selection for Optimal Multi-Agent Path Finding via Graph Embedding
Carmel Shabalin, Omri Kaduri, Roni Stern
0
0
Multi-agent path finding (MAPF) is the problem of finding paths for multiple agents such that they do not collide. This problem manifests in numerous real-world applications such as controlling transportation robots in automated warehouses, moving characters in video games, and coordinating self-driving cars in intersections. Finding optimal solutions to MAPF is NP-Hard, yet modern optimal solvers can scale to hundreds of agents and even thousands in some cases. Different solvers employ different approaches, and there is no single state-of-the-art approach for all problems. Furthermore, there are no clear, provable, guidelines for choosing when each optimal MAPF solver to use. Prior work employed Algorithm Selection (AS) techniques to learn such guidelines from past data. A major challenge when employing AS for choosing an optimal MAPF algorithm is how to encode the given MAPF problem. Prior work either used hand-crafted features or an image representation of the problem. We explore graph-based encodings of the MAPF problem and show how they can be used on-the-fly with a modern graph embedding algorithm called FEATHER. Then, we show how this encoding can be effectively joined with existing encodings, resulting in a novel AS method we call MAPF Algorithm selection via Graph embedding (MAG). An extensive experimental evaluation of MAG on several MAPF algorithm selection tasks reveals that it is either on-par or significantly better than existing methods.
6/18/2024
🤖
Scaling Lifelong Multi-Agent Path Finding to More Realistic Settings: Research Challenges and Opportunities
He Jiang, Yulun Zhang, Rishi Veerapaneni, Jiaoyang Li
0
0
Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) is the problem of moving multiple agents from starts to goals without collisions. Lifelong MAPF (LMAPF) extends MAPF by continuously assigning new goals to agents. We present our winning approach to the 2023 League of Robot Runners LMAPF competition, which leads us to several interesting research challenges and future directions. In this paper, we outline three main research challenges. The first challenge is to search for high-quality LMAPF solutions within a limited planning time (e.g., 1s per step) for a large number of agents (e.g., 10,000) or extremely high agent density (e.g., 97.7%). We present future directions such as developing more competitive rule-based and anytime MAPF algorithms and parallelizing state-of-the-art MAPF algorithms. The second challenge is to alleviate congestion and the effect of myopic behaviors in LMAPF algorithms. We present future directions, such as developing moving guidance and traffic rules to reduce congestion, incorporating future prediction and real-time search, and determining the optimal agent number. The third challenge is to bridge the gaps between the LMAPF models used in the literature and real-world applications. We present future directions, such as dealing with more realistic kinodynamic models, execution uncertainty, and evolving systems.
4/26/2024
❗
Optimal and Bounded Suboptimal Any-Angle Multi-agent Pathfinding
Konstantin Yakovlev, Anton Andreychuk, Roni Stern
0
0
Multi-agent pathfinding (MAPF) is the problem of finding a set of conflict-free paths for a set of agents. Typically, the agents' moves are limited to a pre-defined graph of possible locations and allowed transitions between them, e.g. a 4-neighborhood grid. We explore how to solve MAPF problems when each agent can move between any pair of possible locations as long as traversing the line segment connecting them does not lead to the collision with the obstacles. This is known as any-angle pathfinding. We present the first optimal any-angle multi-agent pathfinding algorithm. Our planner is based on the Continuous Conflict-based Search (CCBS) algorithm and an optimal any-angle variant of the Safe Interval Path Planning (TO-AA-SIPP). The straightforward combination of those, however, scales poorly since any-angle path finding induces search trees with a very large branching factor. To mitigate this, we adapt two techniques from classical MAPF to the any-angle setting, namely Disjoint Splitting and Multi-Constraints. Experimental results on different combinations of these techniques show they enable solving over 30% more problems than the vanilla combination of CCBS and TO-AA-SIPP. In addition, we present a bounded-suboptimal variant of our algorithm, that enables trading runtime for solution cost in a controlled manner.
4/26/2024