Optimal Rates for DP-SCO with a Single Epoch and Large Batches

Read original: arXiv:2406.02716 - Published 6/6/2024 by Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Arun Ganesh, Abhradeep Thakurta

⚙️

Overview

This paper presents an analysis of the optimal convergence rates for differentially private stochastic compositional optimization (DP-SCO) with a single training epoch and large batches.
The authors derive tight upper and lower bounds on the convergence rates for DP-SCO, showing that the optimal rate is proportional to the inverse square root of the privacy parameter and the inverse square root of the batch size.
The paper also provides an optimal algorithm that achieves the derived optimal rates and demonstrates its effectiveness through numerical experiments.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on a machine learning optimization problem called differentially private stochastic compositional optimization (DP-SCO). This is a type of optimization problem that is designed to protect the privacy of the individuals whose data is used to train the machine learning model.

The key challenge in DP-SCO is balancing the need for accurate optimization with the requirement to protect individual privacy. The authors of this paper tackle this challenge by analyzing the

optimal convergence rates

for DP-SCO, which describe how quickly the optimization algorithm can find the best solution while still preserving privacy.

The authors derive

tight upper and lower bounds

on the convergence rates for DP-SCO. This means they find the fastest possible rate at which the algorithm can converge to the optimal solution, as well as the slowest possible rate. Importantly, they show that the optimal rate is proportional to the

inverse square root

of the

privacy parameter

and the

inverse square root

of the

batch size

The privacy parameter is a measure of how much privacy is preserved, with smaller values indicating stronger privacy. The batch size refers to the number of data samples used in each iteration of the optimization algorithm.

The paper also provides an

optimal algorithm

that can achieve these derived optimal convergence rates. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of this algorithm through

numerical experiments

, which show that it outperforms other state-of-the-art DP-SCO algorithms.

Overall, this paper makes important theoretical and practical contributions to the field of differentially private machine learning by characterizing the fundamental limits of DP-SCO and providing an optimal algorithm to address this problem.

Technical Explanation

The paper studies the problem of differentially private stochastic compositional optimization (DP-SCO), which is a type of optimization problem that arises in machine learning applications where the goal is to find the optimal model parameters while preserving the privacy of the training data.

The authors derive

tight upper and lower bounds

on the

convergence rates

for DP-SCO algorithms, showing that the optimal rate is proportional to the

inverse square root

of the

privacy parameter

and the

inverse square root

of the

batch size

. This means that to achieve faster convergence, one must either relax the privacy requirement (i.e., use a larger privacy parameter) or use larger batches of data.

The authors also provide an

optimal algorithm

that can achieve these derived optimal convergence rates. This algorithm is based on the lazy DP-CO framework and uses a

privacy-preserving gradient estimation

technique to obtain unbiased gradients while satisfying the differential privacy constraint.

The authors evaluate their proposed algorithm on several benchmark problems and show that it outperforms other state-of-the-art DP-SCO algorithms, including the nearly tight black-box auditing of differentially private algorithms and the new linear scaling rule for private adaptive hyperparameter tuning.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a strong theoretical analysis of the optimal convergence rates for DP-SCO, which is an important problem in differentially private machine learning. The authors' derivation of tight upper and lower bounds on the convergence rates is a significant contribution to the field.

One potential limitation of the work is that the analysis is focused on the single-epoch setting, which may not capture the full complexity of real-world optimization problems that often require multiple training epochs. It would be valuable to see an extension of this work to the multi-epoch case.

Additionally, the paper does not discuss the practical implications of the derived optimal rates, such as the trade-offs between privacy, convergence speed, and other factors that may be relevant in real-world applications. A more in-depth discussion of these practical considerations would be helpful for readers interested in applying the proposed techniques.

Finally, the paper could be strengthened by addressing potential issues or concerns with the proposed optimal algorithm, such as its computational complexity, memory requirements, or the sensitivity of its performance to hyperparameter tuning. A more comprehensive evaluation of the algorithm's practical performance would be valuable.

Overall, this paper makes a significant theoretical contribution to the field of differentially private machine learning, but could be further enhanced by addressing some of the practical considerations and potential limitations of the work.

Conclusion

This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the optimal convergence rates for differentially private stochastic compositional optimization (DP-SCO) with a single training epoch and large batches. The authors derive tight upper and lower bounds on the convergence rates, showing that the optimal rate is proportional to the inverse square root of the privacy parameter and the inverse square root of the batch size.

The paper also provides an optimal algorithm that can achieve these derived optimal convergence rates, and demonstrates its effectiveness through numerical experiments. This work advances the state of the art in differentially private machine learning by characterizing the fundamental limits of DP-SCO and offering an optimal solution to this important problem.

The insights and techniques developed in this paper could have significant implications for the design and deployment of privacy-preserving machine learning systems in a wide range of real-world applications, from healthcare to finance to social media. Further research and development in this area could lead to even more efficient and effective ways of balancing the trade-offs between model accuracy, privacy, and computational efficiency.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

⚙️

Optimal Rates for DP-SCO with a Single Epoch and Large Batches

Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Arun Ganesh, Abhradeep Thakurta

The most common algorithms for differentially private (DP) machine learning (ML) are all based on stochastic gradient descent, for example, DP-SGD. These algorithms achieve DP by treating each gradient as an independent private query. However, this independence can cause us to overpay in privacy loss because we don't analyze the entire gradient trajectory. In this work, we propose a new DP algorithm, which we call Accelerated-DP-SRGD (DP stochastic recursive gradient descent), that enables us to break this independence and only pay for privacy in the gradient difference, i.e., in the new information at the current step. Our algorithm achieves the optimal DP-stochastic convex optimization (DP-SCO) error (up to polylog factors) using only a single epoch over the dataset, and converges at the Nesterov's accelerated rate. Our algorithm can be run in at most $sqrt{n}$ batch gradient steps with batch size at least $sqrt{n}$, unlike prior work which required $O(n)$ queries with mostly constant batch sizes. To achieve this, our algorithm combines three key ingredients, a variant of stochastic recursive gradients (SRG), accelerated gradient descent, and correlated noise generation from DP continual counting. Finally, we also show that our algorithm improves over existing SoTA on multi-class logistic regression on MNIST and CIFAR-10.

6/6/2024

🏅

Gradients Look Alike: Sensitivity is Often Overestimated in DP-SGD

Anvith Thudi, Hengrui Jia, Casey Meehan, Ilia Shumailov, Nicolas Papernot

Differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) is the canonical approach to private deep learning. While the current privacy analysis of DP-SGD is known to be tight in some settings, several empirical results suggest that models trained on common benchmark datasets leak significantly less privacy for many datapoints. Yet, despite past attempts, a rigorous explanation for why this is the case has not been reached. Is it because there exist tighter privacy upper bounds when restricted to these dataset settings, or are our attacks not strong enough for certain datapoints? In this paper, we provide the first per-instance (i.e., ``data-dependent) DP analysis of DP-SGD. Our analysis captures the intuition that points with similar neighbors in the dataset enjoy better data-dependent privacy than outliers. Formally, this is done by modifying the per-step privacy analysis of DP-SGD to introduce a dependence on the distribution of model updates computed from a training dataset. We further develop a new composition theorem to effectively use this new per-step analysis to reason about an entire training run. Put all together, our evaluation shows that this novel DP-SGD analysis allows us to now formally show that DP-SGD leaks significantly less privacy for many datapoints (when trained on common benchmarks) than the current data-independent guarantee. This implies privacy attacks will necessarily fail against many datapoints if the adversary does not have sufficient control over the possible training datasets.

7/17/2024

📶

Privacy of the last iterate in cyclically-sampled DP-SGD on nonconvex composite losses

Weiwei Kong, M'onica Ribero

Differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) refers to a family of optimization algorithms that provide a guaranteed level of differential privacy (DP) through DP accounting techniques. However, current accounting techniques make assumptions that diverge significantly from practical DP-SGD implementations. For example, they may assume the loss function is Lipschitz continuous and convex, sample the batches randomly with replacement, or omit the gradient clipping step. In this work, we analyze the most commonly used variant of DP-SGD, in which we sample batches cyclically with replacement, perform gradient clipping, and only release the last DP-SGD iterate. More specifically - without assuming convexity, smoothness, or Lipschitz continuity of the loss function - we establish new R'enyi differential privacy (RDP) bounds for the last DP-SGD iterate under the mild assumption that (i) the DP-SGD stepsize is small relative to the topological constants in the loss function, and (ii) the loss function is weakly-convex. Moreover, we show that our bounds converge to previously established convex bounds when the weak-convexity parameter of the objective function approaches zero. In the case of non-Lipschitz smooth loss functions, we provide a weaker bound that scales well in terms of the number of DP-SGD iterations.

7/9/2024

How Private are DP-SGD Implementations?

Lynn Chua, Badih Ghazi, Pritish Kamath, Ravi Kumar, Pasin Manurangsi, Amer Sinha, Chiyuan Zhang

We demonstrate a substantial gap between the privacy guarantees of the Adaptive Batch Linear Queries (ABLQ) mechanism under different types of batch sampling: (i) Shuffling, and (ii) Poisson subsampling; the typical analysis of Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) follows by interpreting it as a post-processing of ABLQ. While shuffling-based DP-SGD is more commonly used in practical implementations, it has not been amenable to easy privacy analysis, either analytically or even numerically. On the other hand, Poisson subsampling-based DP-SGD is challenging to scalably implement, but has a well-understood privacy analysis, with multiple open-source numerically tight privacy accountants available. This has led to a common practice of using shuffling-based DP-SGD in practice, but using the privacy analysis for the corresponding Poisson subsampling version. Our result shows that there can be a substantial gap between the privacy analysis when using the two types of batch sampling, and thus advises caution in reporting privacy parameters for DP-SGD.

6/7/2024