Optimizing Delegation in Collaborative Human-AI Hybrid Teams
0
👨🏫
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- In a hybrid team of human and autonomous agents, the team's performance can be improved by having an AI manager that learns to select the best control agent.
- The manager learns a model of agent behavior and the environment, and uses this to choose the most suitable control agent while minimizing the need for manager intervention.
- The manager's role is constrained by a set of rules that define acceptable team operation, to avoid unnecessary complexity or inefficiency.
- The approach is tested in a simulated driving scenario with a human driver and autonomous driving system, demonstrating performance improvements over the best solo agent.
Plain English Explanation
When humans and autonomous systems work together as a team, it's important to ensure the team operates effectively. The individual team members are referred to as "agents."
In this proposed framework, the team has a special "control agent" that is authorized to make decisions for the entire team at any given time. To determine the best control agent, the researchers introduce an AI manager that observes the team's performance and the environment they're operating in.
The manager learns a model of how the agents behave and the conditions they're working under. Based on this, the manager chooses the most suitable control agent. However, the manager's role is constrained by a set of rules that define acceptable team operation, to avoid adding too much complexity or inefficiency.
The goal is for the manager to select control agents in a way that boosts the team's overall performance, while minimizing the need for the manager to intervene and take over. The researchers test this approach in a simulated driving scenario with a human driver and autonomous driving system, and find it can improve performance by up to 187% compared to the best individual agent.
Technical Explanation
The core of this research is a framework for managing hybrid teams of human and autonomous agents, where only one agent is designated as the "control agent" authorized to act on behalf of the team at any given time.
To determine the best control agent, the researchers propose adding an AI "manager" that observes the team's performance and the environment they're operating in. The manager learns a behavioral model that links the agents' actions to the state of the environment. Based on this model, the manager can then select the most suitable control agent.
However, the manager's role is constrained by a set of rules or "constraints" that define acceptable team operation. This is to ensure the manager's intervention does not add unnecessary complexity or inefficiency to the team's functioning.
The key objective is for the manager to select control agents in a way that maximizes the team's overall performance, while minimizing the frequency of manager intervention required due to constraint violations.
The researchers evaluate this approach in a simulated driving scenario involving a human driver and an autonomous driving system. The scenario includes interfering vehicles, requiring collision avoidance and speed control. The results show the manager can improve team performance by up to 187% compared to the best individual agent operating alone.
Critical Analysis
The research presents a novel and promising approach to managing hybrid human-AI teams. The use of an AI manager to learn a model of team behavior and intelligently select the control agent is a clever way to optimize team performance.
However, the paper does not explore some important limitations and caveats. For example, it's not clear how the manager's constraints are defined, and whether they can be easily generalized to other domains beyond the driving scenario. There are also open questions around how the manager's learning process would scale to larger, more complex teams.
Additionally, the paper does not discuss potential issues around transparency and trust - it's important for human team members to understand and accept the manager's decision-making process. Further research is needed to address these human factors and ensure the approach is truly "human-compatible."
Overall, this research represents a solid step forward in the field of human-AI collaboration, but there are still many open challenges to explore before such systems could be deployed in real-world settings.
Conclusion
This research proposes a novel framework for managing hybrid teams of human and autonomous agents, by introducing an AI "manager" that learns to select the most suitable control agent based on observations of team performance and the environment.
The key innovation is the use of constrained optimization to guide the manager's decision-making, balancing the need to maximize team performance while minimizing the frequency of manager intervention.
Evaluated in a simulated driving scenario, the approach demonstrates significant performance improvements over the best individual agent acting alone. This suggests the potential for similar techniques to enhance the effectiveness of human-AI collaboration in a wide range of real-world applications.
However, further research is needed to address important limitations around generalizability, transparency, and human factors. Nonetheless, this work represents an important step forward in the quest to build truly "human-compatible" autonomous systems that can seamlessly integrate with their human counterparts.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
👨🏫
0
Optimizing Delegation in Collaborative Human-AI Hybrid Teams
Andrew Fuchs, Andrea Passarella, Marco Conti
When humans and autonomous systems operate together as what we refer to as a hybrid team, we of course wish to ensure the team operates successfully and effectively. We refer to team members as agents. In our proposed framework, we address the case of hybrid teams in which, at any time, only one team member (the control agent) is authorized to act as control for the team. To determine the best selection of a control agent, we propose the addition of an AI manager (via Reinforcement Learning) which learns as an outside observer of the team. The manager learns a model of behavior linking observations of agent performance and the environment/world the team is operating in, and from these observations makes the most desirable selection of a control agent. We restrict the manager task by introducing a set of constraints. The manager constraints indicate acceptable team operation, so a violation occurs if the team enters a condition which is unacceptable and requires manager intervention. To ensure minimal added complexity or potential inefficiency for the team, the manager should attempt to minimize the number of times the team reaches a constraint violation and requires subsequent manager intervention. Therefore our manager is optimizing its selection of authorized agents to boost overall team performance while minimizing the frequency of manager intervention. We demonstrate our manager performance in a simulated driving scenario representing the case of a hybrid team of agents composed of a human driver and autonomous driving system. We perform experiments for our driving scenario with interfering vehicles, indicating the need for collision avoidance and proper speed control. Our results indicate a positive impact of our manager, with some cases resulting in increased team performance up to ~187% that of the best solo agent performance.
Read more8/27/2024
0
Cooperation and Control in Delegation Games
Oliver Sourbut, Lewis Hammond, Harriet Wood
Many settings of interest involving humans and machines -- from virtual personal assistants to autonomous vehicles -- can naturally be modelled as principals (humans) delegating to agents (machines), which then interact with each other on their principals' behalf. We refer to these multi-principal, multi-agent scenarios as delegation games. In such games, there are two important failure modes: problems of control (where an agent fails to act in line their principal's preferences) and problems of cooperation (where the agents fail to work well together). In this paper we formalise and analyse these problems, further breaking them down into issues of alignment (do the players have similar preferences?) and capabilities (how competent are the players at satisfying those preferences?). We show -- theoretically and empirically -- how these measures determine the principals' welfare, how they can be estimated using limited observations, and thus how they might be used to help us design more aligned and cooperative AI systems.
Read more8/7/2024
0
Deconstructing Human-AI Collaboration: Agency, Interaction, and Adaptation
Steffen Holter, Mennatallah El-Assady
As full AI-based automation remains out of reach in most real-world applications, the focus has instead shifted to leveraging the strengths of both human and AI agents, creating effective collaborative systems. The rapid advances in this area have yielded increasingly more complex systems and frameworks, while the nuance of their characterization has gotten more vague. Similarly, the existing conceptual models no longer capture the elaborate processes of these systems nor describe the entire scope of their collaboration paradigms. In this paper, we propose a new unified set of dimensions through which to analyze and describe human-AI systems. Our conceptual model is centered around three high-level aspects - agency, interaction, and adaptation - and is developed through a multi-step process. Firstly, an initial design space is proposed by surveying the literature and consolidating existing definitions and conceptual frameworks. Secondly, this model is iteratively refined and validated by conducting semi-structured interviews with nine researchers in this field. Lastly, to illustrate the applicability of our design space, we utilize it to provide a structured description of selected human-AI systems.
Read more4/19/2024
0
Designs for Enabling Collaboration in Human-Machine Teaming via Interactive and Explainable Systems
Rohan Paleja, Michael Munje, Kimberlee Chang, Reed Jensen, Matthew Gombolay
Collaborative robots and machine learning-based virtual agents are increasingly entering the human workspace with the aim of increasing productivity and enhancing safety. Despite this, we show in a ubiquitous experimental domain, Overcooked-AI, that state-of-the-art techniques for human-machine teaming (HMT), which rely on imitation or reinforcement learning, are brittle and result in a machine agent that aims to decouple the machine and human's actions to act independently rather than in a synergistic fashion. To remedy this deficiency, we develop HMT approaches that enable iterative, mixed-initiative team development allowing end-users to interactively reprogram interpretable AI teammates. Our 50-subject study provides several findings that we summarize into guidelines. While all approaches underperform a simple collaborative heuristic (a critical, negative result for learning-based methods), we find that white-box approaches supported by interactive modification can lead to significant team development, outperforming white-box approaches alone, and black-box approaches are easier to train and result in better HMT performance highlighting a tradeoff between explainability and interactivity versus ease-of-training. Together, these findings present three important directions: 1) Improving the ability to generate collaborative agents with white-box models, 2) Better learning methods to facilitate collaboration rather than individualized coordination, and 3) Mixed-initiative interfaces that enable users, who may vary in ability, to improve collaboration.
Read more6/10/2024