Outer Approximation and Super-modular Cuts for Constrained Assortment Optimization under Mixed-Logit Model
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper presents a novel approach to solving the constrained assortment optimization problem under a mixed-logit demand model.
- The authors develop an outer approximation method and super-modular cuts to efficiently solve this NP-hard problem.
- The proposed techniques are shown to outperform existing methods on benchmark instances.
Plain English Explanation
The paper addresses the challenge of assortment optimization - the problem of determining the best set of products to offer to customers in order to maximize revenue or profit. This is a complex optimization problem, especially when customer preferences are modeled using a mixed-logit demand model, which can capture more realistic customer behavior.
The authors propose two new techniques to solve this problem more efficiently. The first is an outer approximation method, which iteratively refines a model of the problem to find the optimal solution. The second is the use of super-modular cuts, which leverage the mathematical structure of the problem to quickly identify and eliminate non-optimal solutions.
By combining these techniques, the authors are able to solve the constrained assortment optimization problem under a mixed-logit demand model much faster than previous approaches. This could have important practical applications in industries like retail, where quickly determining the optimal product assortment is crucial for maximizing profits.
Technical Explanation
The authors address the problem of constrained assortment optimization under a mixed-logit demand model. This is an NP-hard problem that involves determining the optimal set of products to offer to customers in order to maximize revenue or profit, while accounting for customer preferences modeled using a mixed-logit choice model.
To solve this problem, the authors develop two key techniques:
-
Outer Approximation: The authors use an outer approximation method to iteratively refine a model of the problem and converge to the optimal solution. This involves constructing a series of simpler, tractable approximations of the original problem and solving these instead.
-
Super-modular Cuts: The authors leverage the super-modular structure of the mixed-logit demand function to generate cutting planes that can quickly identify and eliminate non-optimal solutions, further accelerating the optimization process.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through computational experiments on benchmark instances, showing that it outperforms existing methods in terms of solution quality and computational efficiency.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a strong technical contribution to the field of assortment optimization, particularly for the case of mixed-logit demand models. The authors' use of outer approximation and super-modular cuts is a novel and effective approach to tackling this challenging optimization problem.
One potential limitation is that the effectiveness of the proposed techniques may depend on the specific structure of the problem instance, such as the number of products, the complexity of the mixed-logit model, and the nature of the constraints. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that further research is needed to fully characterize the performance of their approach across a wider range of problem settings.
Additionally, while the authors demonstrate the computational advantages of their method, they do not provide a detailed analysis of its practical implications or potential real-world applications. It would be valuable to see a discussion of how this work could impact decision-making in industries like retail, where assortment optimization is a critical concern.
Overall, the paper presents a significant algorithmic advance in the field of assortment optimization and serves as a strong foundation for future research in this area.
Conclusion
The paper introduces a novel approach to solving the constrained assortment optimization problem under a mixed-logit demand model. By combining outer approximation and super-modular cuts, the authors develop an efficient optimization algorithm that outperforms existing methods on benchmark instances.
This work has important implications for industries where assortment optimization is a key challenge, such as retail. The authors' techniques could enable businesses to more quickly and accurately determine the optimal set of products to offer, leading to increased profitability and better alignment with customer preferences.
While the paper focuses on the technical details of the proposed approach, further research is needed to fully explore its practical applications and limitations. Nonetheless, this work represents a significant advancement in the field of assortment optimization and sets the stage for future developments in this area.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Outer Approximation and Super-modular Cuts for Constrained Assortment Optimization under Mixed-Logit Model
Hoang Giang Pham, Tien Mai
In this paper, we study the assortment optimization problem under the mixed-logit customer choice model. While assortment optimization has been a major topic in revenue management for decades, the mixed-logit model is considered one of the most general and flexible approaches for modeling and predicting customer purchasing behavior. Existing exact methods have primarily relied on mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) or second-order cone (CONIC) reformulations, which allow for exact problem solving using off-the-shelf solvers. However, these approaches often suffer from weak continuous relaxations and are slow when solving large instances. Our work addresses the problem by focusing on components of the objective function that can be proven to be monotonically super-modular and convex. This allows us to derive valid cuts to outer-approximate the nonlinear objective functions. We then demonstrate that these valid cuts can be incorporated into Cutting Plane or Branch-and-Cut methods to solve the problem exactly. Extensive experiments show that our approaches consistently outperform previous methods in terms of both solution quality and computation time.
Read more7/29/2024
📈
0
Automated Model Selection for Generalized Linear Models
Benjamin Schwendinger, Florian Schwendinger, Laura Vana-Gur
In this paper, we show how mixed-integer conic optimization can be used to combine feature subset selection with holistic generalized linear models to fully automate the model selection process. Concretely, we directly optimize for the Akaike and Bayesian information criteria while imposing constraints designed to deal with multicollinearity in the feature selection task. Specifically, we propose a novel pairwise correlation constraint that combines the sign coherence constraint with ideas from classical statistical models like Ridge regression and the OSCAR model.
Read more4/26/2024
0
Learning to Remove Cuts in Integer Linear Programming
Pol Puigdemont, Stratis Skoulakis, Grigorios Chrysos, Volkan Cevher
Cutting plane methods are a fundamental approach for solving integer linear programs (ILPs). In each iteration of such methods, additional linear constraints (cuts) are introduced to the constraint set with the aim of excluding the previous fractional optimal solution while not affecting the optimal integer solution. In this work, we explore a novel approach within cutting plane methods: instead of only adding new cuts, we also consider the removal of previous cuts introduced at any of the preceding iterations of the method under a learnable parametric criteria. We demonstrate that in fundamental combinatorial optimization settings such cut removal policies can lead to significant improvements over both human-based and machine learning-guided cut addition policies even when implemented with simple models.
Read more6/28/2024
🌿
0
Two-sided Assortment Optimization: Adaptivity Gaps and Approximation Algorithms
Omar El Housni, Alfredo Torrico, Ulysse Hennebelle
To address the challenge of choice congestion in matching markets, in this work, we introduce a two-sided assortment optimization framework under general choice preferences. The goal in this problem is to maximize the expected number of matches by deciding which assortments are displayed to the agents and the order in which they are shown. In this context, we identify several classes of policies that platforms can use in their design. Our goals are: (1) to measure the value that one class of policies has over another one, and (2) to approximately solve the optimization problem itself for a given class. For (1), we define the adaptivity gap as the worst-case ratio between the optimal values of two different policy classes. First, we show that the gap between the class of policies that statically show assortments to one-side first and the class of policies that adaptively show assortments to one-side first is exactly $1-1/e$. Second, we show that the gap between the latter class of policies and the fully adaptive class of policies that show assortments to agents one by one is exactly $1/2$. We also note that the worst policies are those who simultaneously show assortments to all the agents, in fact, we show that their adaptivity gap even with respect to one-sided static policies can be arbitrarily small. For (2), we first show that there exists a polynomial time policy that achieves a $1/4$ approximation factor within the class of policies that adaptively show assortments to agents one by one. Finally, when agents' preferences are governed by multinomial-logit models, we show that a 0.066 approximation factor can be obtained within the class of policies that show assortments to all agents at once.
Read more4/3/2024