Output Perturbation for Differentially Private Convex Optimization: Faster and More General

Overview

• Developing efficient and implementable differentially private (DP) algorithms with strong excess risk bounds is an important problem in modern machine learning.
• Most prior work has focused on private empirical risk minimization (ERM) or private stochastic convex optimization (SCO), which optimize for average performance.
• However, there are often other objectives like fairness, adversarial robustness, or sensitivity to outliers that are not captured by ERM/SCO.
• Proving tight excess risk and runtime bounds for the stronger $(varepsilon, 0)$-DP guarantee remains a challenge.

Plain English Explanation

The key goal of this research is to find efficient and easy-to-implement differentially private (DP) algorithms that can provide strong guarantees on the excess risk, or the difference between the optimal and achieved performance. This is an important problem in modern machine learning.

Most previous work has focused on optimizing for average performance, using techniques like private empirical risk minimization (ERM) or private stochastic convex optimization (SCO). However, there are often other important objectives beyond just average performance, such as fairness, adversarial robustness, or sensitivity to outliers, that are not captured by the standard ERM/SCO setups.

Additionally, most recent work in private SCO has focused on the $(varepsilon, delta)$-DP guarantee, where $delta > 0$. Proving tight excess risk and runtime bounds for the stronger $(varepsilon, 0)$-DP guarantee, where $delta = 0$, remains a challenging open problem.

Technical Explanation

The key contributions of this research are:

1. $(varepsilon, 0)$-DP Guarantees for Smooth and Strongly Convex SCO: The authors provide the tightest known $(varepsilon, 0)$-DP excess risk bounds and fastest runtimes for smooth and strongly convex loss functions in the SCO setting. Their linear-time algorithm achieves optimal excess risk under these assumptions.

2. DP Optimization for Tilted Loss Functions: The authors study DP optimization for a broad class of tilted loss functions, which can be used to promote fairness or robustness and are not necessarily of the standard ERM form. They establish the first known DP excess risk and runtime bounds for optimizing this class, and show these bounds are near-optimal under smoothness and strong convexity assumptions.

3. DP Adversarial Training: The authors specialize their theory to the setting of DP adversarial training. Their results are achieved using a simple yet practical differentially private algorithm: output perturbation. The authors show that the power of this method to achieve strong privacy, utility, and runtime guarantees has not been fully appreciated in prior works.

Critical Analysis

The authors have made important contributions in addressing the challenge of developing efficient and practical DP algorithms with strong excess risk guarantees. By considering objectives beyond just average performance, and by targeting the stronger $(varepsilon, 0)$-DP guarantee, this work expands the frontiers of what is possible in differentially private machine learning.

However, the paper does not address several potential limitations and areas for further research:

• The strong assumptions of smoothness and strong convexity may limit the applicability of the proposed algorithms in more general settings.
• The paper does not provide a thorough empirical evaluation of the proposed algorithms, which would be helpful to understand their practical performance.
• The authors do not discuss the potential trade-offs between the different objectives (e.g., fairness vs. adversarial robustness) and how to navigate these trade-offs in a DP setting.

Addressing these limitations and further exploring the connections between DP, fairness, robustness, and other machine learning objectives would be valuable directions for future research in this area.

Conclusion

This research makes significant progress in developing efficient and easily implementable differentially private algorithms that can provide strong excess risk guarantees. By considering a broader class of objectives beyond just average performance, and by targeting the stronger $(varepsilon, 0)$-DP guarantee, the authors have expanded the frontiers of what is possible in differentially private machine learning.

While the paper has some limitations, such as its strong assumptions and lack of empirical evaluation, it represents an important step forward in this important and rapidly evolving field. The insights and techniques developed in this work could have far-reaching implications for building privacy-preserving machine learning systems that are both effective and fair.