Overview of PerpectiveArg2024: The First Shared Task on Perspective Argument Retrieval

Read original: arXiv:2407.19670 - Published 7/30/2024 by Neele Falk, Andreas Waldis, Iryna Gurevych

Overview

The paper presents an overview of the PerpectiveArg2024 shared task, which focused on perspective argument retrieval.
The task aimed to explore how argument retrieval systems can encode socio-cultural variables and retrieve arguments from diverse perspectives.
The paper discusses the dataset, evaluation metrics, and key findings from the shared task.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a research competition called PerpectiveArg2024, which challenged teams to build systems that could find arguments on a topic from different perspectives. The goal was to see if these systems could take into account social and cultural factors when retrieving relevant arguments.

The researchers created a dataset of arguments on various issues, with each argument labeled as representing a particular perspective. Teams then built systems to search this dataset and retrieve arguments that matched a given perspective. The performance of these systems was evaluated using metrics like how well they could identify the correct perspective for each argument.

The main findings from this shared task were that [link to key findings section]. These results suggest that [link to significance/implications section]. Overall, this research aims to explore how artificial intelligence systems can be designed to surface a diverse range of views on complex topics, rather than just the most popular or mainstream perspectives.

Technical Explanation

The PerpectiveArg2024 shared task focused on the challenge of [link to introduction section] perspective argument retrieval. Participants were tasked with building systems that could retrieve arguments from a dataset that represented a variety of socio-cultural viewpoints on different issues.

The dataset used in the task contained [dataset details]. Each argument was labeled with the perspective it represented, such as [examples of perspectives]. Participants' systems were evaluated on how well they could [link to evaluation metrics section]:

Identify the correct perspective for a given argument
Retrieve a set of arguments that collectively covered a range of perspectives on a topic

The key findings from the shared task include [link to key findings section]:

[Finding 1]
[Finding 2]
[Finding 3]

These results suggest that [link to significance/implications section]. However, the researchers also note several limitations and areas for future work, such as [link to caveats/limitations section].

Critical Analysis

The PerpectiveArg2024 shared task represents an important step in exploring how AI systems can be designed to surface diverse perspectives on complex topics. By focusing on the ability to retrieve arguments from different socio-cultural viewpoints, the research highlights the need to move beyond simple relevance-based retrieval and consider the social and cultural factors that shape people's beliefs and opinions.

That said, the researchers acknowledge several limitations in their work. [Link to caveats/limitations section] These caveats suggest the need for further research to more fully understand the challenges of building perspective-aware argument retrieval systems.

Additionally, one could argue that the task itself may be overly simplistic, as real-world debates often involve nuanced, intertwined perspectives that defy simple categorization. [Link to potential issues section] Further work may be needed to develop more sophisticated frameworks for modeling and retrieving arguments from diverse viewpoints.

Overall, the PerpectiveArg2024 shared task represents a valuable contribution to the field of argument retrieval and the broader challenge of building AI systems that can engage with the complexity of human discourse. While the current findings are promising, there is still much work to be done to fully realize the potential of this line of research.

Conclusion

The PerpectiveArg2024 shared task explored the challenge of building argument retrieval systems that can account for socio-cultural variables and surface a diverse range of perspectives on complex topics. The key findings suggest that [link to key findings section] and highlight the potential for such systems to enhance our ability to engage with the nuance and diversity of human debate and decision-making.

However, the researchers also identify important limitations and areas for future work, such as [link to caveats/limitations section]. Addressing these challenges will be crucial for translating the insights from this research into practical, inclusive, and ethically-aligned AI systems that can support more informed and constructive public discourse.

Overall, the PerpectiveArg2024 shared task represents an important step forward in the quest to develop AI technologies that can better reflect the richness and complexity of human perspectives. As this field of research continues to evolve, it will be essential to maintain a critical and nuanced understanding of both the promises and the potential pitfalls of these emerging technologies.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Overview of PerpectiveArg2024: The First Shared Task on Perspective Argument Retrieval

Neele Falk, Andreas Waldis, Iryna Gurevych

Argument retrieval is the task of finding relevant arguments for a given query. While existing approaches rely solely on the semantic alignment of queries and arguments, this first shared task on perspective argument retrieval incorporates perspectives during retrieval, accounting for latent influences in argumentation. We present a novel multilingual dataset covering demographic and socio-cultural (socio) variables, such as age, gender, and political attitude, representing minority and majority groups in society. We distinguish between three scenarios to explore how retrieval systems consider explicitly (in both query and corpus) and implicitly (only in query) formulated perspectives. This paper provides an overview of this shared task and summarizes the results of the six submitted systems. We find substantial challenges in incorporating perspectivism, especially when aiming for personalization based solely on the text of arguments without explicitly providing socio profiles. Moreover, retrieval systems tend to be biased towards the majority group but partially mitigate bias for the female gender. While we bootstrap perspective argument retrieval, further research is essential to optimize retrieval systems to facilitate personalization and reduce polarization.

7/30/2024

Beyond Relevance: Evaluate and Improve Retrievers on Perspective Awareness

Xinran Zhao, Tong Chen, Sihao Chen, Hongming Zhang, Tongshuang Wu

The task of Information Retrieval (IR) requires a system to identify relevant documents based on users' information needs. In real-world scenarios, retrievers are expected to not only rely on the semantic relevance between the documents and the queries but also recognize the nuanced intents or perspectives behind a user query. For example, when asked to verify a claim, a retrieval system is expected to identify evidence from both supporting vs. contradicting perspectives, for the downstream system to make a fair judgment call. In this work, we study whether retrievers can recognize and respond to different perspectives of the queries -- beyond finding relevant documents for a claim, can retrievers distinguish supporting vs. opposing documents? We reform and extend six existing tasks to create a benchmark for retrieval, where we have diverse perspectives described in free-form text, besides root, neutral queries. We show that current retrievers covered in our experiments have limited awareness of subtly different perspectives in queries and can also be biased toward certain perspectives. Motivated by the observation, we further explore the potential to leverage geometric features of retriever representation space to improve the perspective awareness of retrievers in a zero-shot manner. We demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of our projection-based methods on the same set of tasks. Further analysis also shows how perspective awareness improves performance on various downstream tasks, with 4.2% higher accuracy on AmbigQA and 29.9% more correlation with designated viewpoints on essay writing, compared to non-perspective-aware baselines.

5/7/2024

Which Side Are You On? A Multi-task Dataset for End-to-End Argument Summarisation and Evaluation

Hao Li, Yuping Wu, Viktor Schlegel, Riza Batista-Navarro, Tharindu Madusanka, Iqra Zahid, Jiayan Zeng, Xiaochi Wang, Xinran He, Yizhi Li, Goran Nenadic

With the recent advances of large language models (LLMs), it is no longer infeasible to build an automated debate system that helps people to synthesise persuasive arguments. Previous work attempted this task by integrating multiple components. In our work, we introduce an argument mining dataset that captures the end-to-end process of preparing an argumentative essay for a debate, which covers the tasks of claim and evidence identification (Task 1 ED), evidence convincingness ranking (Task 2 ECR), argumentative essay summarisation and human preference ranking (Task 3 ASR) and metric learning for automated evaluation of resulting essays, based on human feedback along argument quality dimensions (Task 4 SQE). Our dataset contains 14k examples of claims that are fully annotated with the various properties supporting the aforementioned tasks. We evaluate multiple generative baselines for each of these tasks, including representative LLMs. We find, that while they show promising results on individual tasks in our benchmark, their end-to-end performance on all four tasks in succession deteriorates significantly, both in automated measures as well as in human-centred evaluation. This challenge presented by our proposed dataset motivates future research on end-to-end argument mining and summarisation. The repository of this project is available at https://github.com/HaoBytes/ArgSum-Datatset

8/21/2024

Unlocking Varied Perspectives: A Persona-Based Multi-Agent Framework with Debate-Driven Text Planning for Argument Generation

Zhe Hu, Hou Pong Chan, Jing Li, Yu Yin

Writing persuasive arguments is a challenging task for both humans and machines. It entails incorporating high-level beliefs from various perspectives on the topic, along with deliberate reasoning and planning to construct a coherent narrative. Current language models often generate surface tokens autoregressively, lacking explicit integration of these underlying controls, resulting in limited output diversity and coherence. In this work, we propose a persona-based multi-agent framework for argument writing. Inspired by the human debate, we first assign each agent a persona representing its high-level beliefs from a unique perspective, and then design an agent interaction process so that the agents can collaboratively debate and discuss the idea to form an overall plan for argument writing. Such debate process enables fluid and nonlinear development of ideas. We evaluate our framework on argumentative essay writing. The results show that our framework can generate more diverse and persuasive arguments through both automatic and human evaluations.

7/1/2024