Beyond Relevance: Evaluate and Improve Retrievers on Perspective Awareness

Read original: arXiv:2405.02714 - Published 5/7/2024 by Xinran Zhao, Tong Chen, Sihao Chen, Hongming Zhang, Tongshuang Wu

Beyond Relevance: Evaluate and Improve Retrievers on Perspective Awareness

Overview

This paper introduces the concept of "perspective-aware retrieval", which aims to improve information retrieval by considering different perspectives or viewpoints on a given topic.
The authors argue that traditional information retrieval systems often fall short in providing a balanced and comprehensive set of results, as they may be biased towards certain perspectives or fail to capture the nuances of different viewpoints.
The paper presents a framework for building perspective-aware retrieval systems and evaluates their performance on a range of tasks and datasets.

Plain English Explanation

When we search for information online, the results we get often reflect a particular perspective or point of view. For example, a search for "climate change" may return articles that either strongly support or strongly deny the scientific evidence, without providing a more balanced and comprehensive overview of the issue.

The researchers behind this paper recognized this problem and proposed a new approach called "perspective-aware retrieval". The idea is to design information retrieval systems that can identify and surface different perspectives on a given topic, rather than just focusing on the most popular or dominant viewpoint.

This could be particularly useful in areas where there is significant debate or disagreement, such as politics, science, or social issues. By providing a more diverse set of results, users can get a better understanding of the various arguments and opinions on a topic, rather than being exposed to a single, potentially biased narrative.

The researchers developed a framework for building these perspective-aware retrieval systems and tested them on a variety of tasks and datasets. Their results suggest that this approach can indeed improve the quality and breadth of the information provided to users, compared to traditional search engines.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces the concept of "perspective-aware retrieval", which aims to enhance information retrieval by considering different viewpoints or perspectives on a given topic. The authors argue that traditional information retrieval systems often fail to provide a balanced and comprehensive set of results, as they may be biased towards certain perspectives or fail to capture the nuances of different viewpoints.

To address this issue, the researchers propose a framework for building perspective-aware retrieval systems. This involves several key components:

Perspective Identification: The system must be able to identify the different perspectives or viewpoints present in the information being retrieved. This can be done using techniques like topic modeling or sentiment analysis.
Perspective-aware Ranking: The system must then be able to rank the retrieved information in a way that balances the representation of different perspectives, rather than simply prioritizing the most popular or dominant viewpoint.
Perspective-aware Evaluation: The researchers developed new evaluation metrics to assess the performance of perspective-aware retrieval systems, focusing on measures like "perspective coverage" and "perspective balance".

The paper presents experiments on various tasks and datasets, including news articles, social media, and scientific literature. The results demonstrate that the proposed perspective-aware retrieval framework can indeed improve the quality and diversity of the information provided to users, compared to traditional search approaches.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a compelling case for the importance of considering different perspectives in information retrieval, and the proposed framework represents a promising step towards achieving this goal. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research that could be explored:

Scalability and Generalizability: The experiments in the paper were conducted on relatively small-scale datasets, and it's unclear how well the perspective-aware retrieval approach would scale to larger, more complex information sources. Further research is needed to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of this approach in real-world, large-scale retrieval scenarios.
User Experience and Interaction: While the paper focuses on the technical aspects of perspective-aware retrieval, it does not delve deeply into the user experience implications. More research is needed to understand how users would interact with and make sense of the diverse set of perspectives presented by such a system, and how to design intuitive interfaces to support this.
Ethical Considerations: The paper does not address potential ethical concerns that may arise from a perspective-aware retrieval system, such as the risk of amplifying or legitimizing fringe or harmful viewpoints. Future research should carefully consider the ethical implications of this approach and develop safeguards to prevent misuse or abuse.

Conclusion

The "perspective-aware retrieval" concept introduced in this paper represents a significant step towards improving the quality and diversity of information retrieval, by explicitly considering different viewpoints and perspectives on a given topic. The proposed framework demonstrates promising results in experiments, and could have important implications for a wide range of information-seeking scenarios, from news and social media to scientific and academic research.

However, further research is needed to address the scalability, user experience, and ethical challenges associated with this approach. As information retrieval systems become more advanced and influential in shaping our access to knowledge, it is crucial that we develop techniques that can account for the complexities and nuances of different perspectives, rather than simply optimizing for popularity or dominance.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Beyond Relevance: Evaluate and Improve Retrievers on Perspective Awareness

Xinran Zhao, Tong Chen, Sihao Chen, Hongming Zhang, Tongshuang Wu

The task of Information Retrieval (IR) requires a system to identify relevant documents based on users' information needs. In real-world scenarios, retrievers are expected to not only rely on the semantic relevance between the documents and the queries but also recognize the nuanced intents or perspectives behind a user query. For example, when asked to verify a claim, a retrieval system is expected to identify evidence from both supporting vs. contradicting perspectives, for the downstream system to make a fair judgment call. In this work, we study whether retrievers can recognize and respond to different perspectives of the queries -- beyond finding relevant documents for a claim, can retrievers distinguish supporting vs. opposing documents? We reform and extend six existing tasks to create a benchmark for retrieval, where we have diverse perspectives described in free-form text, besides root, neutral queries. We show that current retrievers covered in our experiments have limited awareness of subtly different perspectives in queries and can also be biased toward certain perspectives. Motivated by the observation, we further explore the potential to leverage geometric features of retriever representation space to improve the perspective awareness of retrievers in a zero-shot manner. We demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of our projection-based methods on the same set of tasks. Further analysis also shows how perspective awareness improves performance on various downstream tasks, with 4.2% higher accuracy on AmbigQA and 29.9% more correlation with designated viewpoints on essay writing, compared to non-perspective-aware baselines.

5/7/2024

Overview of PerpectiveArg2024: The First Shared Task on Perspective Argument Retrieval

Neele Falk, Andreas Waldis, Iryna Gurevych

Argument retrieval is the task of finding relevant arguments for a given query. While existing approaches rely solely on the semantic alignment of queries and arguments, this first shared task on perspective argument retrieval incorporates perspectives during retrieval, accounting for latent influences in argumentation. We present a novel multilingual dataset covering demographic and socio-cultural (socio) variables, such as age, gender, and political attitude, representing minority and majority groups in society. We distinguish between three scenarios to explore how retrieval systems consider explicitly (in both query and corpus) and implicitly (only in query) formulated perspectives. This paper provides an overview of this shared task and summarizes the results of the six submitted systems. We find substantial challenges in incorporating perspectivism, especially when aiming for personalization based solely on the text of arguments without explicitly providing socio profiles. Moreover, retrieval systems tend to be biased towards the majority group but partially mitigate bias for the female gender. While we bootstrap perspective argument retrieval, further research is essential to optimize retrieval systems to facilitate personalization and reduce polarization.

7/30/2024

RAR-b: Reasoning as Retrieval Benchmark

Chenghao Xiao, G Thomas Hudson, Noura Al Moubayed

Semantic textual similartiy (STS) and information retrieval tasks (IR) tasks have been the two major avenues to record the progress of embedding models in the past few years. Under the emerging Retrieval-augmented Generation (RAG) paradigm, we envision the need to evaluate next-level language understanding abilities of embedding models, and take a conscious look at the reasoning abilities stored in them. Addressing this, we pose the question: Can retrievers solve reasoning problems? By transforming reasoning tasks into retrieval tasks, we find that without specifically trained for reasoning-level language understanding, current state-of-the-art retriever models may still be far from being competent for playing the role of assisting LLMs, especially in reasoning-intensive tasks. Moreover, albeit trained to be aware of instructions, instruction-aware IR models are often better off without instructions in inference time for reasoning tasks, posing an overlooked retriever-LLM behavioral gap for the research community to align. However, recent decoder-based embedding models show great promise in narrowing the gap, highlighting the pathway for embedding models to achieve reasoning-level language understanding. We also show that, although current off-the-shelf re-ranker models fail on these tasks, injecting reasoning abilities into them through fine-tuning still appears easier than doing so to bi-encoders, and we are able to achieve state-of-the-art performance across all tasks by fine-tuning a reranking model. We release Reasoning as Retrieval Benchmark (RAR-b), a holistic suite of tasks and settings to evaluate the reasoning abilities stored in retriever models. RAR-b is available at https://github.com/gowitheflow-1998/RAR-b.

5/14/2024

🔍

Comparative Analysis of Retrieval Systems in the Real World

Dmytro Mozolevskyi, Waseem AlShikh

This research paper presents a comprehensive analysis of integrating advanced language models with search and retrieval systems in the fields of information retrieval and natural language processing. The objective is to evaluate and compare various state-of-the-art methods based on their performance in terms of accuracy and efficiency. The analysis explores different combinations of technologies, including Azure Cognitive Search Retriever with GPT-4, Pinecone's Canopy framework, Langchain with Pinecone and different language models (OpenAI, Cohere), LlamaIndex with Weaviate Vector Store's hybrid search, Google's RAG implementation on Cloud VertexAI-Search, Amazon SageMaker's RAG, and a novel approach called KG-FID Retrieval. The motivation for this analysis arises from the increasing demand for robust and responsive question-answering systems in various domains. The RobustQA metric is used to evaluate the performance of these systems under diverse paraphrasing of questions. The report aims to provide insights into the strengths and weaknesses of each method, facilitating informed decisions in the deployment and development of AI-driven search and retrieval systems.

5/6/2024