P4Control: Line-Rate Cross-Host Attack Prevention via In-Network Information Flow Control Enabled by Programmable Switches and eBPF

2405.14970

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/27/2024 by Osama Bajaber, Bo Ji, Peng Gao
P4Control: Line-Rate Cross-Host Attack Prevention via In-Network Information Flow Control Enabled by Programmable Switches and eBPF

Abstract

Modern targeted attacks such as Advanced Persistent Threats use multiple hosts as stepping stones and move laterally across them to gain deeper access to the network. However, existing defenses lack end-to-end information flow visibility across hosts and cannot block cross-host attack traffic in real time. In this paper, we propose P4Control, a network defense system that precisely confines end-to-end information flows in a network and prevents cross-host attacks at line rate. P4Control introduces a novel in-network decentralized information flow control (DIFC) mechanism and is the first work that enforces DIFC at the network level at network line rate. This is achieved through: (1) an in-network primitive based on programmable switches for tracking inter-host information flows and enforcing line-rate DIFC policies; (2) a lightweight eBPF-based primitive deployed on hosts for tracking intra-host information flows. P4Control also provides an expressive policy framework for specifying DIFC policies against different attack scenarios. We conduct extensive evaluations to show that P4Control can effectively prevent cross-host attacks in real time, while maintaining line-rate network performance and imposing minimal overhead on the network and host machines. It is also noteworthy that P4Control can facilitate the realization of a zero trust architecture through its fine-grained least-privilege network access control.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper introduces P4Control, a system that uses programmable switches and eBPF (extended Berkeley Packet Filter) to prevent cross-host attacks in computer networks at line rate.
  • P4Control aims to provide in-network information flow control, ensuring that network traffic is restricted to only authorized communication patterns between hosts.
  • The key innovation is the use of programmable switches and eBPF to enforce these communication policies efficiently and at high speeds, without relying on end-host software.

Plain English Explanation

In computer networks, there is a risk of attacks that span across multiple hosts, where a compromised machine can be used to launch attacks on other machines. P4Control: Line-Rate Cross-Host Attack Prevention via In-Network Information Flow Control Enabled by Programmable Switches and eBPF is a system that tries to prevent these cross-host attacks by controlling the flow of information in the network.

The core idea is to have the network switches themselves enforce strict rules on which hosts can communicate with each other. These rules are programmed into the switches using a language called P4, which allows the switches to be customized and reprogrammed. Additionally, the system uses a technology called eBPF (extended Berkeley Packet Filter) to further enhance the enforcement of these communication policies.

By handling this access control and communication monitoring within the network, rather than relying on software running on each individual host, P4Control can operate at very high speeds, preventing attacks in real-time as network traffic flows through the switches. This is in contrast to solutions that depend on end-host software, which can be slower and more vulnerable to evasion by sophisticated attackers.

Technical Explanation

P4Control is designed to provide line-rate cross-host attack prevention by leveraging programmable switches and eBPF. The key components of the system are:

  1. P4 Programmable Switches: The network switches are programmed using the P4 language to implement custom packet processing logic. This allows the switches to enforce fine-grained communication policies between hosts, restricting traffic based on attributes like source, destination, and protocol.

  2. eBPF Integration: The system also integrates eBPF, a powerful in-kernel programming framework, to further enhance the enforcement of communication policies. eBPF allows the injection of custom code directly into the kernel of the switch operating system, enabling more sophisticated monitoring and control of network traffic.

  3. Policy Management: P4Control provides a centralized policy management system, where network administrators can define and update the allowed communication patterns between hosts. These policies are then automatically translated into the appropriate P4 and eBPF rules and deployed to the network switches.

The key technical innovation is the combination of programmable switches and eBPF, which enables P4Control to perform efficient, line-rate information flow control in the network. By handling access control and monitoring within the network infrastructure, rather than relying on end-host software, P4Control can provide robust protection against cross-host attacks without introducing significant performance overhead.

Critical Analysis

The P4Control system presents a promising approach to preventing cross-host attacks, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

  1. Complexity of Policy Management: While the centralized policy management system is convenient, maintaining and updating communication policies across a large, complex network may still be a significant challenge for network administrators.

  2. Dependency on Programmable Switches: The effectiveness of P4Control is dependent on the availability of programmable network switches. Not all networks may have access to such hardware, which could limit the adoption of the system.

  3. Potential for Evasion: While P4Control aims to provide robust protection, it's possible that sophisticated attackers could find ways to evade the system's detection and enforcement mechanisms, particularly if they have detailed knowledge of the underlying P4 and eBPF implementations.

  4. Performance Impact on Network: Although the paper claims that P4Control operates at line rate, the additional processing required by the programmable switches and eBPF could still have some impact on overall network performance, especially in high-traffic environments.

To address these concerns, future research could explore ways to simplify policy management, expand the system's compatibility with a wider range of network hardware, and investigate potential evasion techniques and countermeasures. Additionally, more extensive performance evaluations in real-world network scenarios would help validate the scalability and efficiency of the P4Control approach.

Conclusion

P4Control presents an innovative solution to the problem of cross-host attacks in computer networks. By leveraging programmable switches and eBPF, the system can enforce fine-grained communication policies at line rate, effectively preventing unauthorized access and information flow between hosts.

The key strength of P4Control is its ability to perform this critical security function within the network infrastructure, rather than relying on end-host software. This approach allows for robust, high-speed protection against attacks without introducing significant performance overhead.

While the system has some potential limitations, the underlying concepts and techniques employed by P4Control represent an important step forward in the field of network security. As programmable network hardware and in-kernel technologies like eBPF continue to evolve, solutions like P4Control may become increasingly valuable in safeguarding modern, interconnected computing environments.

Optimal Flow Admission Control for Edge Computing via the combination of programmable switches and in-network processing could serve as a model for future research and development in this area, with the goal of creating more secure and resilient computer networks.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Flow Optimization at Inter-Datacenter Networks for Application Run-time Acceleration

Flow Optimization at Inter-Datacenter Networks for Application Run-time Acceleration

Berta Serracanta, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal, Fabio Maino, Albert Cabellos

YC

0

Reddit

0

In the present-day, distributed applications are commonly spread across multiple datacenters, reaching out to edge and fog computing locations. The transition away from single datacenter hosting is driven by capacity constraints in datacenters and the adoption of hybrid deployment strategies, combining on-premise and public cloud facilities. However, the performance of such applications is often limited by extended Flow Completion Times (FCT) for short flows due to queuing behind bursts of packets from concurrent long flows. To address this challenge, we propose a solution to prioritize short flows over long flows in the Software-Defined Wide-Area Network (SD-WAN) interconnecting the distributed computing platforms. Our solution utilizes eBPF to segregate short and long flows, transmitting them over separate tunnels with the same properties. By effectively mitigating queuing delays, we consistently achieve a 1.5 times reduction in FCT for short flows, resulting in improved application response times. The proposed solution works with encrypted traffic and is application-agnostic, making it deployable in diverse distributed environments without modifying the applications themselves. Our testbed evaluation demonstrates the effectiveness of our approach in accelerating the run-time of distributed applications, providing valuable insights for optimizing multi-datacenter and edge deployments.

Read more

6/19/2024

👨‍🏫

Intrusion Tolerance for Networked Systems through Two-Level Feedback Control

Kim Hammar, Rolf Stadler

YC

0

Reddit

0

We formulate intrusion tolerance for a system with service replicas as a two-level optimal control problem. On the local level node controllers perform intrusion recovery, and on the global level a system controller manages the replication factor. The local and global control problems can be formulated as classical problems in operations research, namely, the machine replacement problem and the inventory replenishment problem. Based on this formulation, we design TOLERANCE, a novel control architecture for intrusion-tolerant systems. We prove that the optimal control strategies on both levels have threshold structure and design efficient algorithms for computing them. We implement and evaluate TOLERANCE in an emulation environment where we run 10 types of network intrusions. The results show that TOLERANCE can improve service availability and reduce operational cost compared with state-of-the-art intrusion-tolerant systems.

Read more

6/6/2024

🌐

Deterministic and Probabilistic P4-Enabled Lightweight In-Band Network Telemetry

Konstantinos Papadopoulos, Panagiotis Papadimitriou, Chrysa Papagianni

YC

0

Reddit

0

In-band network telemetry (INT), empowered by programmable dataplanes such as P4, comprises a viable approach to network monitoring and telemetry analysis. However, P4-INT as well as other existing frameworks for INT yield a substantial transmission overhead, which grows linearly with the number of hops and the number of telemetry values. To address this issue, we present a deterministic and a probabilistic technique for lightweight INT, termed as DLINT and PLINT,respectively. In particular, DLINT exercises per-flow aggregation by spreading the telemetry values across the packets of a flow. DLINT relies on switch coordination through the use of per-flow telemetry states, maintained within P4 switches. Furthermore, DLINT utilizes Bloom Filters (BF) in order to compress the state lookup tables within P4 switches. On the other hand, PLINT employs a probabilistic approach based on reservoir sampling. PLINT essentially empowers every INT node to insert telemetry values with equal probability within each packet. Our evaluation results corroborate that both proposed techniques alleviate the transmission overhead of P4-INT, while maintaining a high degree of monitoring accuracy. In addition, we perform a comparative evaluation between DLINT and PLINT. DLINT is more effective in conveying path traces to the telemetry server, whereas PLINT detects more promptly path updates exploiting its more efficient INT header space utilization

Read more

4/11/2024

🛸

Collaborative Safety-Critical Control for Networked Dynamic Systems

Brooks A. Butler, Philip E. Par'e

YC

0

Reddit

0

As modern systems become ever more connected with complex dynamic coupling relationships, the development of safe control methods for such networked systems becomes paramount. In this paper, we define a general networked model with coupled dynamics and local control and discuss the relationship of node-level safety definitions for individual agents with local neighborhood dynamics. We define a node-level barrier function (NBF), node-level control barrier function (NCBF), and collaborative node-level barrier function (cNCBF) and provide conditions under which sets defined by these functions will be forward invariant. We use collaborative node-level barrier functions to construct a novel distributed algorithm for the safe control of collaborating network agents and provide conditions under which the algorithm is guaranteed to converge to a viable set of safe control actions for all agents or a terminally infeasible state for at least one agent. We introduce the notion of non-compliance of network neighbors as a metric of robustness for collaborative safety for a given network state and chosen barrier function hyper-parameters. We illustrate these results on a networked susceptible-infected-susceptible (SIS) model.

Read more

5/2/2024