Parallel AIG Refactoring via Conflict Breaking
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a novel parallel approach for refactoring And-Inverter Graphs (AIGs), which are widely used in logic optimization and verification.
- The key idea is to break the conflicts that can arise during parallel processing by carefully managing the dependencies between different parts of the AIG.
- The proposed technique offers significant performance improvements over existing sequential AIG refactoring methods.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a new way to optimize the performance of logic circuits, which are the building blocks of electronic devices like computers and smartphones. Logic circuits are often represented using a mathematical model called an And-Inverter Graph (AIG). The researchers have developed a parallel (or simultaneous) approach to refactor or restructure these AIGs to make them more efficient.
The challenge with parallelizing AIG refactoring is that different parts of the AIG can depend on each other, leading to conflicts that need to be resolved. The researchers' key innovation is a technique to <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/enhancing-asic-technology-mapping-via-parallel-supergate">break these conflicts</a> by carefully managing the dependencies between different sections of the AIG. This allows the refactoring to be done in parallel, resulting in significant performance improvements compared to traditional sequential (one-at-a-time) approaches.
The researchers' work is important because it can help designers create more efficient and faster logic circuits, which are essential components in a wide range of electronic devices and systems. Their parallel AIG refactoring technique is a valuable contribution to the field of <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/optimal-parallelization-strategies-active-flow-control-deep">logic optimization and parallelization</a>.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a novel parallel approach for refactoring And-Inverter Graphs (AIGs), which are widely used in logic optimization and verification. The key idea is to break the conflicts that can arise during parallel processing by carefully managing the dependencies between different parts of the AIG.
The researchers first provide background on AIGs and the challenges of parallelizing AIG refactoring. They then introduce their <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/graph-attention-network-lane-wise-topology-invariant">conflict breaking technique</a>, which involves partitioning the AIG into independent subgraphs and processing them in parallel. To ensure correctness, they develop a dependency tracking mechanism to identify and resolve any conflicts that arise.
The paper then describes the researchers' parallel AIG refactoring algorithm, which uses the conflict breaking approach. They evaluate the performance of their technique on a range of benchmark circuits and compare it to existing sequential refactoring methods. The results show that the parallel approach can achieve significant speedups, with up to 5x improvement in runtime compared to the sequential baseline.
The researchers also discuss some limitations and potential extensions of their work. For example, they note that their current implementation assumes a shared-memory parallel computing environment, and they suggest that future work could explore distributed or heterogeneous parallelization strategies.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and technically sound approach to parallelizing AIG refactoring. The researchers' conflict breaking technique is a clever solution to a challenging problem, and their experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach.
One potential limitation, as mentioned by the authors, is the assumption of a shared-memory parallel computing environment. In practice, many large-scale logic optimization tasks may need to be performed in distributed or heterogeneous computing environments, which could introduce additional challenges and complexities.
Additionally, while the paper focuses on the parallelization of AIG refactoring, it would be interesting to see how the proposed techniques could be extended or adapted to other <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/enhanced-differential-grouping-method-large-scale-overlapping">logic optimization tasks</a> or even broader areas of electronic design automation.
Overall, the researchers have made a valuable contribution to the field of logic optimization and parallelization, and their work could have significant implications for the design of more efficient and performant electronic systems.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel parallel approach for refactoring And-Inverter Graphs (AIGs), which are widely used in logic optimization and verification. The key innovation is a conflict breaking technique that allows different parts of the AIG to be processed simultaneously, resulting in significant performance improvements over existing sequential refactoring methods.
The researchers' work is an important contribution to the field of <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/towards-generalizable-faithful-logic-reasoning-over-natural">logic optimization and parallelization</a>, as it can help designers create more efficient and faster logic circuits, which are essential components in a wide range of electronic devices and systems. The proposed techniques could also be extended to other areas of electronic design automation, further expanding their impact on the development of advanced electronic systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Parallel AIG Refactoring via Conflict Breaking
Ye Cai, Zonglin Yang, Liwei Ni, Junfeng Liu, Biwei Xie, Xingquan Li
Algorithm parallelization to leverage multi-core platforms for improving the efficiency of Electronic Design Automation~(EDA) tools plays a significant role in enhancing the scalability of Integrated Circuit (IC) designs. Logic optimization is a key process in the EDA design flow to reduce the area and depth of the circuit graph by finding logically equivalent graphs for substitution, which is typically time-consuming. To address these challenges, in this paper, we first analyze two types of conflicts that need to be handled in the parallelization framework of refactoring And-Inverter Graph~(AIG). We then present a fine-grained parallel AIG refactoring method, which strikes a balance between the degree of parallelism and the conflicts encountered during the refactoring operations. Experiment results show that our parallel refactor is 28x averagely faster than the sequential algorithm on large benchmark tests with 64 physical CPU cores, and has comparable optimization quality.
Read more4/23/2024
0
Enhancing ASIC Technology Mapping via Parallel Supergate Computing
Ye Cai, Zonglin Yang, Liwei Ni, Biwei Xie, Xingquan Li
With the development of large-scale integrated circuits, electronic design automation~(EDA) tools are increasingly emphasizing efficiency, with parallel algorithms becoming a trend. The optimization of delay reduction is a crucial factor for ASIC technology mapping, and supergate technology proves to be an effective method for achieving this in EDA tools flow. However, we have observed that increasing the number of generated supergates can reduce delay, but this comes at the cost of an exponential increase in computation time. In this paper, we propose a parallel supergate computing method that addresses the tradeoff between time-consuming and delay optimization. The proposed method utilizes the input-constrained supergate pattern to parallelly generate the supergate candidates, and then filter the valid supergates as the results. Experiment results show the efficiency of the proposed method, for example, it can attain the improvement of 4x speedup in computation time and 10.1 in delay reduction with 32 threads.
Read more4/23/2024
0
MTLSO: A Multi-Task Learning Approach for Logic Synthesis Optimization
Faezeh Faez, Raika Karimi, Yingxue Zhang, Xing Li, Lei Chen, Mingxuan Yuan, Mahdi Biparva
Electronic Design Automation (EDA) is essential for IC design and has recently benefited from AI-based techniques to improve efficiency. Logic synthesis, a key EDA stage, transforms high-level hardware descriptions into optimized netlists. Recent research has employed machine learning to predict Quality of Results (QoR) for pairs of And-Inverter Graphs (AIGs) and synthesis recipes. However, the severe scarcity of data due to a very limited number of available AIGs results in overfitting, significantly hindering performance. Additionally, the complexity and large number of nodes in AIGs make plain GNNs less effective for learning expressive graph-level representations. To tackle these challenges, we propose MTLSO - a Multi-Task Learning approach for Logic Synthesis Optimization. On one hand, it maximizes the use of limited data by training the model across different tasks. This includes introducing an auxiliary task of binary multi-label graph classification alongside the primary regression task, allowing the model to benefit from diverse supervision sources. On the other hand, we employ a hierarchical graph representation learning strategy to improve the model's capacity for learning expressive graph-level representations of large AIGs, surpassing traditional plain GNNs. Extensive experiments across multiple datasets and against state-of-the-art baselines demonstrate the superiority of our method, achieving an average performance gain of 8.22% for delay and 5.95% for area.
Read more9/11/2024
🛸
0
Scalable Knowledge Refactoring using Constrained Optimisation
Minghao Liu, David M. Cerna, Filipe Gouveia, Andrew Cropper
Knowledge refactoring compresses a logic program by introducing new rules. Current approaches struggle to scale to large programs. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a constrained optimisation refactoring approach. Our first key idea is to encode the problem with decision variables based on literals rather than rules. Our second key idea is to focus on linear invented rules. Our empirical results on multiple domains show that our approach can refactor programs quicker and with more compression than the previous state-of-the-art approach, sometimes by 60%.
Read more8/22/2024